IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pja218.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Satish Kumar Jain

Personal Details

First Name:Satish
Middle Name:Kumar
Last Name:Jain
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pja218
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Centre for Economic Studies and Planning
Jawaharlal Nehru University

New Delhi, India
https://www.jnu.ac.in/sss/cesp
RePEc:edi:cejnuin (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters Books Editorship

Working papers

  1. Jain, Satish, 2023. "Successive Joint Torts: Conditions for Efficiency," MPRA Paper 118440, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  2. Jain, Satish, 2020. "The Strong Consistency of Neutral and Monotonic Binary Social Decision Rules," MPRA Paper 109657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  3. Jain, Satish, 2010. "Market, Democracy, and Diversity of Individual Preferences," Working Papers 7, JICA Research Institute.
  4. Satish K. Jain & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2004. "Economic Efficiency, Distributive Justice and Liability Rules," Working papers 130, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.

Articles

  1. Satish K. Jain, 2020. "On the Normative Elements of Marxism," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(1), pages 7-15, June.
  2. Jain Satish K., 2016. "Uncertainty Regarding Interpretation of the “Negligence Rule” and Its Implications for the Efficiency of Outcomes," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 147-168, August.
  3. Jain Satish K. & Kundu Rajendra P., 2015. "Decomposition of Accident Loss and Efficiency of Liability Rules," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 453-480, November.
  4. Jain Satish K., 2012. "Decoupled Liability and Efficiency: An Impossibility Theorem," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 697-718, December.
  5. Satish Jain, 2010. "On the efficiency of the negligence rule," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 343-359.
  6. Satish K. Jain, 2009. "Efficiency Of Liability Rules With Multiple Victims," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 119-134, February.
  7. Jain Satish K., 2009. "The Structure of Incremental Liability Rules," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 373-398, June.
  8. Manmohan Agarwal & Satish K Jain & Anjan Mukherji, 2009. "2007 Jnu Conference On Institutions," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 22-23, February.
  9. Jain, Satish K. & Kundu, Rajendra P., 2006. "Characterization of efficient simple liability rules with multiple tortfeasors," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 410-427, September.
  10. Satish Jain, 2006. "Efficiency of liability rules: A reconsideration," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 359-373.
  11. Manmohan Agarwal & Satish Jain & Anjan Mukherji, 2006. "Introduction: Conference on governance," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 255-256.
  12. Satish K. Jain & Ram Singh, 2002. "Efficient Liability Rules: Complete Characterization," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 105-124, March.
  13. Satish Jain, 1996. "Structure of neutral and monotonic binary social decision rules with quasi-transitive individual preferences," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 195-212, June.
  14. Jain, Satish K., 1988. "Characterization of monotonicity and neutrality for binary Paretian social decision rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 307-312, June.

Chapters

  1. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Elementary Logic," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 2, pages 9-33, Springer.
  2. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Implications of Weakening of Some of Arrow Conditions," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 7, pages 95-102, Springer.
  3. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Some Important Value-Judgments, Rules and Theorems," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 6, pages 77-94, Springer.
  4. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Sets, Relations, Functions," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 3, pages 35-46, Springer.
  5. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Introduction," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 1, pages 1-7, Springer.
  6. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Summary and Concluding Remarks," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 10, pages 151-154, Springer.
  7. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Strategic Aspects," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 9, pages 131-150, Springer.
  8. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Social Choice Theoretic Framework and Arrow Impossibility Theorem," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 5, pages 61-75, Springer.
  9. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "The Method of Majority Decision: Conditions for Transitivity and Quasi-Transitivity," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 8, pages 103-129, Springer.
  10. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Binary Relations," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Social Choice Theory, chapter 4, pages 47-60, Springer.

Books

  1. Satish Kumar Jain, 2022. "Social Choice Theory," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-981-16-9661-9, August.
  2. Satish Kumar Jain, 2015. "Economic Analysis of Liability Rules," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-81-322-2029-9, December.
  3. Jain, Satish (ed.), 2010. "Law and Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198067733.

Editorship

  1. Themes in Economics, Springer.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

    Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

  1. Jain Satish K. & Kundu Rajendra P., 2015. "Decomposition of Accident Loss and Efficiency of Liability Rules," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 453-480, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Kundu, Rajendra P. & Kaur, Harshil, 2022. "Efficient simple liability assignment rules: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 22-31.
    2. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2023. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligence rules," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 119-140, June.
    3. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kunda, 2021. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligencerules," Working Papers 2157, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.

  2. Jain Satish K., 2012. "Decoupled Liability and Efficiency: An Impossibility Theorem," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 697-718, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Feldman Allan & Singh Ram, 2021. "Equilibria Under Negligence Liability: How the Standard Claims Fall Apart," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Kundu, Rajendra P. & Kaur, Harshil, 2022. "Efficient simple liability assignment rules: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 22-31.
    3. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2023. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligence rules," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 119-140, June.
    4. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kunda, 2021. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligencerules," Working Papers 2157, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    5. Allan M Feldman & Ram Singh, 2021. "Equilibria under Liability Rules: How the standard claims fall apart," Working papers 315, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    6. Harshil Kaur & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2020. "Efficient Liability Assignment: Is Coupling a Necessity?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2388-2394.

  3. Jain Satish K., 2009. "The Structure of Incremental Liability Rules," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 373-398, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Dari-Mattiacci Giuseppe & Hendriks Eva S., 2013. "Relative Fault and Efficient Negligence: Comparative Negligence Explained," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-40, June.
    2. Kundu, Rajendra P. & Kaur, Harshil, 2022. "Efficient simple liability assignment rules: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 22-31.
    3. Jain, Satish, 2010. "Market, Democracy, and Diversity of Individual Preferences," Working Papers 7, JICA Research Institute.

  4. Jain, Satish K. & Kundu, Rajendra P., 2006. "Characterization of efficient simple liability rules with multiple tortfeasors," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 410-427, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Kundu, Rajendra P. & Kaur, Harshil, 2022. "Efficient simple liability assignment rules: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 22-31.
    2. Satish K. Jain, 2009. "Efficiency Of Liability Rules With Multiple Victims," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 119-134, February.
    3. Lando, Henrik & Schweizer, Urs, 2021. "Causation and the incentives of multiple injurers," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Jain Satish K. & Kundu Rajendra P., 2015. "Decomposition of Accident Loss and Efficiency of Liability Rules," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 453-480, November.
    5. Jain, Satish, 2023. "Successive Joint Torts: Conditions for Efficiency," MPRA Paper 118440, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  5. Satish Jain, 2006. "Efficiency of liability rules: A reconsideration," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 359-373.

    Cited by:

    1. Kundu, Rajendra P. & Kaur, Harshil, 2022. "Efficient simple liability assignment rules: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 22-31.
    2. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2023. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligence rules," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 119-140, June.
    3. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kunda, 2021. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligencerules," Working Papers 2157, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.

  6. Satish K. Jain & Ram Singh, 2002. "Efficient Liability Rules: Complete Characterization," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 105-124, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Ram Singh & Francesco Parisi, 2010. "The Efficiency Of Comparative Causation," Working Papers id:2681, eSocialSciences.
    2. Feldman Allan & Singh Ram, 2021. "Equilibria Under Negligence Liability: How the Standard Claims Fall Apart," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Schweizer, Urs, 2005. "Law and Economics of Obligations," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 209-228, June.
    4. Ram Singh, 2002. "Causation, Economic Efficiency and the Law of Torts," Working papers 102, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    5. Dari-Mattiacci Giuseppe & Hendriks Eva S., 2013. "Relative Fault and Efficient Negligence: Comparative Negligence Explained," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-40, June.
    6. Ram Singh, 2008. "Risk, Informational Asymmetry and Product Liability: An Enquiry into Conflicting Objectives," Working Papers id:1466, eSocialSciences.
    7. Kundu, Rajendra P. & Kaur, Harshil, 2022. "Efficient simple liability assignment rules: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 22-31.
    8. Ram Singh, 2008. "On The Existence and Efficiency of Equilibria Under Liability Rules," Working Papers id:1716, eSocialSciences.
    9. Satish K. Jain & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2004. "Economic Efficiency, Distributive Justice and Liability Rules," Working papers 130, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    10. Ram Singh, 2005. "Comparative Causation -- A Re-examination," Working papers 139, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    11. Ram Singh, 2003. "Efficiency of 'Simple' Liability Rules When Courts Make Erroneous Estimation of the Damage," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 39-58, July.
    12. Satish K. Jain, 2009. "Efficiency Of Liability Rules With Multiple Victims," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 119-134, February.
    13. Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci & Bruno Lovat & Francesco Parisi, 2014. "Loss-sharing between Nonnegligent Parties," Working Papers of BETA 2014-06, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    14. Jain, Satish K. & Kundu, Rajendra P., 2006. "Characterization of efficient simple liability rules with multiple tortfeasors," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 410-427, September.
    15. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2023. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligence rules," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 119-140, June.
    16. Ram Singh, 2016. "‘Full’ Compensation Criteria in the Law of Torts: An Enquiry into the Doctrine of Causation," Working Papers id:11237, eSocialSciences.
    17. Kim, Jeonghyun & Feldman, Allan M., 2006. "Victim or injurer, small car or SUV: Tort liability rules under role-type uncertainty," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 455-477, December.
    18. Jain Satish K., 2009. "The Structure of Incremental Liability Rules," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 373-398, June.
    19. Ram Singh, 2008. "Efficient Liability Rules When Courts Make Errors in Estimation of the Harm: Complet Characterization," Working Papers id:1612, eSocialSciences.
    20. FRANCESCO PARISI & Ram Singh, 2009. "Efficiency Of Equilibria Under Comparative Causation," Working papers 179, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    21. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kunda, 2021. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligencerules," Working Papers 2157, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    22. Ram Singh, 2002. "Characterization of Efficient Product Liability Rules: When Consumers are Imperfectly Informed," Working papers 110, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    23. Satish Jain, 2006. "Efficiency of liability rules: A reconsideration," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 359-373.
    24. Schweizer, Urs, 2004. "Law and Economics of Obligations," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 2/2004, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    25. Rajendra P. Kundu, 2009. "Efficiency Of Liability Rules With Interdependent Costs Of Care," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 71-88, February.
    26. Jain, Satish, 2010. "Market, Democracy, and Diversity of Individual Preferences," Working Papers 7, JICA Research Institute.
    27. Allan M Feldman & Ram Singh, 2021. "Equilibria under Liability Rules: How the standard claims fall apart," Working papers 315, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    28. Jain Satish K., 2012. "Decoupled Liability and Efficiency: An Impossibility Theorem," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 697-718, December.
    29. Jain Satish K. & Kundu Rajendra P., 2015. "Decomposition of Accident Loss and Efficiency of Liability Rules," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 453-480, November.
    30. Singh, Ram, 2007. "‘Causation-consistent’ liability, economic efficiency and the law of torts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 179-203.
    31. Ram Singh & Allan M. Feldman, 2010. "Comparative Vigilance," Working Papers id:2682, eSocialSciences.
    32. González, Patrick, 2003. "Optimal Assignment of Liabilities," Cahiers de recherche 0305, GREEN.
    33. Harshil Kaur & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2020. "Efficient Liability Assignment: Is Coupling a Necessity?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2388-2394.
    34. Jain, Satish, 2023. "Successive Joint Torts: Conditions for Efficiency," MPRA Paper 118440, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    35. Jeonghyun Kim, 2013. "Revisiting the Learned Hand Formula and Economic Analysis of Negligence," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 169(3), pages 407-432, September.
    36. Srivastava Astha & Srivastava Ankur, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Accident Law: A New Liability Rule that Induces Socially Optimal Behaviour in Case of Limited Information," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 119-131, March.

  7. Satish Jain, 1996. "Structure of neutral and monotonic binary social decision rules with quasi-transitive individual preferences," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 195-212, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Fasil Alemante & Donald E. Campbell & Jerry S. Kelly, 2016. "Characterizing the resolute part of monotonic social choice correspondences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(4), pages 765-783, October.

  8. Jain, Satish K., 1988. "Characterization of monotonicity and neutrality for binary Paretian social decision rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 307-312, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Campbell, Donald E. & Graver, Jack & Kelly, Jerry S., 2012. "There are more strategy-proof procedures than you think," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 263-265.
    2. Fasil Alemante & Donald E. Campbell & Jerry S. Kelly, 2016. "Characterizing the resolute part of monotonic social choice correspondences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(4), pages 765-783, October.
    3. Satish Jain, 1996. "Structure of neutral and monotonic binary social decision rules with quasi-transitive individual preferences," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 195-212, June.

Chapters

    Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

Books

  1. Satish Kumar Jain, 2015. "Economic Analysis of Liability Rules," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-81-322-2029-9, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Kundu, Rajendra P. & Kaur, Harshil, 2022. "Efficient simple liability assignment rules: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 22-31.
    2. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2023. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligence rules," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 119-140, June.
    3. Papiya Ghosh & Rajendra P. Kunda, 2021. "Decomposition of accident loss and decoupled liability assignment: A class of negligencerules," Working Papers 2157, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    4. Harshil Kaur & Rajendra P. Kundu, 2020. "Efficient Liability Assignment: Is Coupling a Necessity?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2388-2394.
    5. Jain, Satish, 2023. "Successive Joint Torts: Conditions for Efficiency," MPRA Paper 118440, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  2. Jain, Satish (ed.), 2010. "Law and Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198067733.

    Cited by:

    1. Ojo, Marianne, 2011. "Basel III – responses to consultative documents, vital aspects of the consultative processes and the journey culminating in the present framework (Part 1)," MPRA Paper 33082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Gerasimos T. SOLDATOS, 2015. "Law, Coercion And Socioeconomic Equilibrium," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 16, pages 39-50, December.
    3. Donatella Porrini & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2011. "Class action and financial markets: insights from law and economics," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(2), pages 140-160, May.
    4. Anna Menozzi & María Gutiérrez Urtiaga & Davide Vannoni, 2012. "Board composition, political connections, and performance in state-owned enterprises," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(3), pages 671-698, June.
    5. Ojo, Marianne, 2010. "BASEL III – Responses to consultative documents, vital aspects of the consultative processes and the journey culminating in the present framework," MPRA Paper 25975, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. A. Saichev & D. Sornette, 2011. "Time-Bridge Estimators of Integrated Variance," Papers 1108.2611, arXiv.org.
    7. Keith N. Hylton & Haizhen Lin, 2009. "Trial Selection Theory: A Unified Model," Working Papers 2009-06, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    8. Eric R. Claeys, 2011. "Bundle-of-Sticks Notions in Legal and Economic Scholarship," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 8(3), pages 205-214, September.
    9. Orley C. Ashenfelter & Daniel S. Hosken & Matthew C. Weinberg, 2013. "The Price Effects of a Large Merger of Manufacturers: A Case Study of Maytag-Whirlpool," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 239-261, February.
    10. Soldatos, Gerasimos T., 2015. "Law, Coercion, And Socioeconomic Equilibrium," MPRA Paper 68953, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Roger Blair & Christina DePasquale, 2011. "Considerations of Countervailing Power," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 39(1), pages 137-143, August.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 2 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-GER: German Papers (1) 2023-10-16
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2023-10-16
  3. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-20
  4. NEP-LAW: Law and Economics (1) 2023-10-16
  5. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2021-09-20

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Satish Kumar Jain should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.