IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/psu73.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Kai E. Suelzle

Personal Details

First Name:Kai
Middle Name:E.
Last Name:Suelzle
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:psu73
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
International Trade Centre - UNCTAD/WTO Palais des Nations CH - 1211 Geneva 10 Tel.: +41 22 730 0609 Fax: +41 22 730 0603

Affiliation

International Trade Centre
United Nations

Genève, Switzerland
http://www.intracen.org/
RePEc:edi:itcunch (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Kai Sülzle, 2006. "Innovation and Adoption of Electronic Business Technologies," ifo Working Paper Series 38, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
  2. Kai Suelzle, 2005. "Stable and Efficient Electronic Business Networks: Key Players and the Dilemma of Peripheral Firms," Working Papers 05-21, NET Institute, revised Oct 2005.
  3. Kai Suelzle, 2004. "Duopolistic Competition between Independent and Collaborative Business-to-Business Marketplaces," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 191, Econometric Society.
  4. Kai Sülzle & Achim Wambach, 2002. "Insurance in a Market for Credence Goods," CESifo Working Paper Series 677, CESifo.

Articles

  1. Sülzle, Kai, 2009. "Duopolistic competition between independent and collaborative business-to-business marketplaces," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 615-624, September.
  2. Hans Schedl & Kai Sülzle, 2007. "Sector-specific regulation: transitory or ad infinitum?An international look at regulation institutions," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 60(09), pages 31-34, May.
  3. Kai Sülzle & Achim Wambach, 2005. "Insurance in a Market for Credence Goods," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(1), pages 159-176, March.
  4. Hans Schedl & Kai Sülzle, 2004. "New developments in electronic business-to-business transactions," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 57(19), pages 10-18, October.

Books

  1. Kai Sülzle, 2007. "Strategic decisions on electronic business-to-business markets," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 27.
  2. Hans Schedl & Kai Sülzle & Andreas Kuhlmann, 2007. "Sector-specific regulation: transitory or ad infinitum? An international status report on regulatory institutions," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 40, October.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Kai Suelzle, 2004. "Duopolistic Competition between Independent and Collaborative Business-to-Business Marketplaces," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 191, Econometric Society.

    Cited by:

    1. Marco Henseler, 2006. "Horizontal versus Vertical Electronic Business-to-Business Marketplaces," Discussion paper series from the Institute of Economics and Law, University of Stuttgart 2006/1, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Economics and Law.

  2. Kai Sülzle & Achim Wambach, 2002. "Insurance in a Market for Credence Goods," CESifo Working Paper Series 677, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Balafoutas, Loukas & Kerschbamer, Rudolf, 2020. "Credence goods in the literature: What the past fifteen years have taught us about fraud, incentives, and the role of institutions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    2. Huck, Steffen & Lünser, Gabriele & Spitzer, Florian & Tyran, Jean-Robert, 2016. "Medical insurance and free choice of physician shape patient overtreatment: A laboratory experiment," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2014-307r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Fong, Yuk-fai & Liu, Ting & Wright, Donald J., 2014. "On the role of verifiability and commitment in credence goods markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 118-129.
    4. Loukas Balafoutas & Helena Fornwagner & Rudolf Kerschbamer & Matthias Sutter & Maryna Tverdostup, 2023. "Diagnostic Uncertainty and Insurance Coverage in Credence Goods Markets," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 257, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    5. Winand Emons, 2010. "Incentive Compatible Reimbursement Schemes for Physicians," Diskussionsschriften dp1001, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    6. Hyndman, Kyle & Ozerturk, Saltuk, 2011. "Consumer information in a market for expert services," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 628-640.
    7. Mimra, Wanda & Rasch, Alexander & Waibel, Christian, 2016. "Second opinions in markets for expert services: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PB), pages 106-125.
    8. Helmut Bester & Matthias Dahm, 2018. "Credence Goods, Costly Diagnosis and Subjective Evaluation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(611), pages 1367-1394, June.
    9. Bonroy, Olivier & Lemarié, Stéphane & Tropéano, Jean-Philippe, 2013. "Credence goods, experts and risk aversion," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 464-467.
    10. Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Jürges, Hendrik & Wiesen, Daniel, 2018. "Dishonesty in healthcare practice: A behavioral experiment on upcoding in neonatology," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2018:3, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme.
    11. Jennifer Brown & Dylan B. Minor, 2012. "Misconduct in Credence Good Markets," NBER Working Papers 18608, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Alexander Rasch & Christian Waibel, 2018. "What Drives Fraud in a Credence Goods Market? – Evidence from a Field Study," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 80(3), pages 605-624, June.
    13. Jennifer Brown & Dylan Minor, 2015. "Misconduct in Financial Services: Differences across Organizations," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-022, Harvard Business School.
    14. Balafoutas, Loukas & Kerschbamer, Rudolf & Sutter, Matthias, 2013. "Second-Degree Moral Hazard in a Real-World Credence Goods Market," IZA Discussion Papers 7714, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Vincze, János, 2010. "Miért és mitől védjük a fogyasztókat?. Aszimmetrikus információ és/vagy korlátozott racionalitás [Asymmetric information and/or bounded rationality: why are consumers protected and from what?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 725-752.
    16. Hunsoo Kim & W. Jean Kwon, 2006. "A Multi‐Line Insurance Fraud Recognition System: A Government‐Led Approach in Korea," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 9(2), pages 131-147, September.
    17. Bester, Helmut & Ouyang, Yaofu, 2018. "Optimal procurement of a credence good under limited liability," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 96-129.
    18. Parampreet Christopher Bindra & Rudolf Kerschbamer & Daniel Neururer & Matthias Sutter, 2020. "Reveal it or conceal it: On the value of second opinions in a low-entry-barriers credence goods market," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2020_11, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    19. Nell, Martin & Schiller, Jörg, 2002. "Erklärungsansätze für vertragswidriges Verhalten von Versicherungsnehmern aus Sicht der ökonomischen Theorie," Working Papers on Risk and Insurance 7, University of Hamburg, Institute for Risk and Insurance.
    20. Uwe Dulleck & Rudolf Kerschbamer, 2005. "Experts vs. discounters: consumer free riding and experts withholding advice in markets for credence goods," Economics working papers 2005-09, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    21. Kerschbamer, Rudolf & Dulleck, Uwe, 2005. "Experts vs Discounters: Competition and Market Unravelling When Consumers Do Not Know What they Need," CEPR Discussion Papers 5242, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    22. Manela Karunadasa & Katri K. Sieberg & Toni Tapani Kristian Jantunen, 2023. "Payment Systems, Supplier-Induced Demand, and Service Quality in Credence Goods: Results from a Laboratory Experiment," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-31, May.
    23. Georges Dionne, 2012. "The Empirical Measure of Information Problems with Emphasis on Insurance Fraud and Dynamic Data," Cahiers de recherche 1233, CIRPEE.
    24. Katharina Momsen & Markus Ohndorf, 2022. "Seller Opportunism in Credence Good Markets – The Role of Market Conditions," Working Papers 2022-10, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    25. Ouyang, Yaofu, 2016. "Credence Goods, Risk Averse, and Optimal Insurance," MPRA Paper 70392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    26. Perodaud, Maxime & Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Yamada, Takashi, 2022. "An experimental analysis of gender discrimination in a credence goods market," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    27. Joachim Heinzel, 2019. "Credence Goods Markets with Heterogeneous Experts," Working Papers CIE 118, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    28. Fengrong Liu & Jiayu Chen & Chaozhu Li & Fenghui Xu, 2023. "Cost Sharing and Cost Shifting Mechanisms under a per Diem Payment System in a County of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    29. Dominik Erharter, 2012. "Credence goods markets, distributional preferences and the role of institutions," Working Papers 2012-11, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    30. Gerlach, Heiko & Li, Junqian, 2022. "Experts, trust and competition," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 552-578.
    31. Joachim Heinzel, 2019. "Credence Goods Markets with Fair and Opportunistic Experts," Working Papers CIE 119, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    32. Bindra, Parampreet Christopher & Kerschbamer, Rudolf & Neururer, Daniel & Sutter, Matthias, 2021. "On the value of second opinions: A credence goods field experiment," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

Articles

  1. Sülzle, Kai, 2009. "Duopolistic competition between independent and collaborative business-to-business marketplaces," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 615-624, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Kai Sülzle & Achim Wambach, 2005. "Insurance in a Market for Credence Goods," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(1), pages 159-176, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Hans Schedl & Kai Sülzle, 2004. "New developments in electronic business-to-business transactions," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 57(19), pages 10-18, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Michael Reinhard & Hans Schedl, 2005. "The implications of e-business for industry and trade," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 58(21), pages 26-38, November.

Books

  1. Hans Schedl & Kai Sülzle & Andreas Kuhlmann, 2007. "Sector-specific regulation: transitory or ad infinitum? An international status report on regulatory institutions," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 40, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Hans Schedl & Günther Knieps & Ingo Vogelsang & Stephan Korehnke & Nejc M. Jakopin & Klaus von den Hoff & Iris Henseler-Unger & Rebecca Harms, 2007. "Sector-Particular Regulation: Prepaid or ad infinitum?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 60(21), pages 03-28, November.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 2 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2006-11-12
  2. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (1) 2004-08-16
  3. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2006-11-12
  4. NEP-NET: Network Economics (1) 2006-11-12
  5. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (1) 2006-11-12

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Kai E. Suelzle should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.