A Sequential Game Model Of Sports Championship Series: Theory And Estimation
AbstractUsing data from professional baseball, basketball, and hockey, we estimate the parameters of a sequential game model of best-of-n championship series controlling for measured and unmeasured differences in team strength and bootstrapping the maximum-likelihood estimates to improve their small sample properties. We find negligible strategic effects in all three sports: teams play as well as possible in each game regardless of the game's importance in the series. We also estimate negligible unobserved heterogeneity after controlling for regular season records and past appearance in the championship series: Teams are estimated to be exactly as strong as they appear on paper. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by MIT Press in its journal The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Volume (Year): 81 (1999)
Issue (Month): 4 (November)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/
Other versions of this item:
- Christopher Ferrall & Anthony A. Smith, Jr., . "A Sequential Game Model of Sports Championship Series: Theory and Estimation," GSIA Working Papers, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business 1997-38, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Dmitry Ryvkin, 2011.
"Fatigue in Dynamic Tournaments,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 1011-1041, December.
- Dmitry Ryvkin, 2009. "Fatigue in dynamic tournaments," Working Papers, Department of Economics, Florida State University wp2009_06_03, Department of Economics, Florida State University.
- Koop G., 2002.
"Comparing the Performance of Baseball Players: A Multiple-Output Approach,"
Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association,
American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 710-720, September.
- Gary Koop, 2004. "Comparing the Performance of Baseball Players: A Multiple Output Approach," ESE Discussion Papers, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh 72, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
- Mago, Shakun D. & Sheremeta, Roman M. & Yates, Andrew, 2013.
"Best-of-three contest experiments: Strategic versus psychological momentum,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier,
Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 287-296.
- Shakun D. Mago & Roman M. Sheremeta & Andrew Yates, 2012. "Best-of-Three Contest Experiments: Strategic versus Psychological Momentum," Working Papers, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute 12-30, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Mago, Shakun & Sheremeta, Roman & Yates, Andrew, 2012. "Best-of-Three Contest Experiments: Strategic versus Psychological Momentum," MPRA Paper 43031, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Vukina, Tomislav & Zheng, Xiaoyong, 2008. "Homogenous and Heterogenous Contestants in Piece Rate Tournaments: Theory and Empirical Analysis," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association) 6540, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Erez, Eyal & Sela, Aner, 2010. "Round-Robin Tournaments with Effort Constraints," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 8021, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Moschini, GianCarlo, 2008.
"Incentives and Outcomes in a Strategic Setting: The 3-Points-For-A-Win System in Soccer,"
Staff General Research Papers, Iowa State University, Department of Economics
12942, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
- Giancarlo Moschini, 2010. "Incentives And Outcomes In A Strategic Setting: The 3-Points-For-A-Win System In Soccer," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, Western Economic Association International, vol. 48(1), pages 65-79, 01.
- Andrew J. Leach, 2003. "SubGame, set and match. Identifying Incentive Response in a Tournament," Cahiers de recherche 04-02, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
- Chen, Jiawei & Shum, Matthew, 2010. "Estimating a tournament model of intra-firm wage differentials," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 39-55, March.
- Konrad, Kai A., 2007. "Strategy in contests: an introduction," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Processes and Governance, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) SP II 2007-01, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
- Mueller-Langer, Frank & Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick, 2013. "Leading-effect vs. Risk-taking in Dynamic Tournaments: Evidence from a Real-life Randomized Experiment," Discussion Papers in Economics, University of Munich, Department of Economics 15452, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Karie Kirkpatrick).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.