Do immigrant outflows lead to native inflows? An empirical analysis of the migratory responses to US state immigration legislation
AbstractI estimate the impact on internal migration for 52 different demographic groups of the recent influx of state omnibus immigration laws targeting undocumented immigrants in the United States. I find evidence that while the demographic groups pinpointed as having higher percentages of undocumented immigrants certainly experience population and employment 'outflows' from states implementing these immigration laws, there is a lack of associated 'inflows' for those demographic groups identified by economic theory as being probable substitutes for undocumented immigrants. Several segments designated as probable substitutes actually experience an adverse effect on population and employment. This finding provides rigorous empirical backing to existing anecdotal evidence of the same cross-state migratory phenomenon, resulting in clear policy implications in relation to the ongoing debate over immigration.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Economics.
Volume (Year): 45 (2013)
Issue (Month): 30 (October)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20
Other versions of this item:
- Michael Good, 2012. "Do immigrant outflows lead to native inflows? An empirical analysis of the migratory responses to US state immigration legislation," Working Papers 1202, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Orrenius, Pia M. & Zavodny, Madeline, 2014.
"How do e-verify mandates affect unauthorized immigrant workers?,"
1403, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
- Orrenius, Pia M. & Zavodny, Madeline, 2014. "How Do E-Verify Mandates Affect Unauthorized Immigrant Workers?," IZA Discussion Papers 7992, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes & Cynthia Bansak & Allan A. Zebedee, 2014.
"On the Effectiveness of SB1070 in Arizona,"
CReAM Discussion Paper Series
1424, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), Department of Economics, University College London.
- Michael Good, 2012. "How Localized is the Pro-trade Effect of Immigration? Evidence from Mexico and the United States," Working Papers 1203, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.