IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/decfin/v31y2008i2p95-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Axiomatic approach to approximate solutions in multiobjective optimization

Author

Listed:
  • E. Miglierina
  • E. Molho
  • F. Patrone
  • S. Tijs

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Miglierina & E. Molho & F. Patrone & S. Tijs, 2008. "Axiomatic approach to approximate solutions in multiobjective optimization," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 31(2), pages 95-115, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:decfin:v:31:y:2008:i:2:p:95-115
    DOI: 10.1007/s10203-008-0080-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10203-008-0080-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10203-008-0080-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1157-1160, December.
    2. Graziano Pieri & Fioravante Patrone & Anna Torre & Stef Tijs, 1998. "On consistent solutions for strategic games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 27(2), pages 191-200.
    3. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 1025-1031, October.
    4. Norde, Henk & Patrone, Fioravante & Tijs, Stef, 2000. "Characterizing properties of approximate solutions for optimization problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 297-311, November.
    5. Peleg, Bezalel & Tijs, Stef, 1996. "The Consistency Principle for Games in Strategic Forms," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 25(1), pages 13-34.
    6. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    7. Machina, Mark J, 1982. ""Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 277-323, March.
    8. Patrone, F. & Pieri, G. & Tijs, S.H. & Torre, A., 1998. "On consistent solutions for strategic games," Other publications TiSEM cc482511-a079-4067-88b2-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. J. Benoist, 1998. "Connectedness of the Efficient Set for Strictly Quasiconcave Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 627-654, March.
    10. E. Miglierina & E. Molho & M. Rocca, 2005. "Well-Posedness and Scalarization in Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 391-409, August.
    11. E. Miglierina & E. Molho, 2003. "Well-posedness and convexity in vector optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 58(3), pages 375-385, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Chicco & F. Mignanego & L. Pusillo & S. Tijs, 2011. "Vector Optimization Problems via Improvement Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 516-529, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miglierina Enrico & Molho Elena & Patrone Fioravante & Steff H. Tijs, 2005. "An axiomatic approach to approximate solutions in vector optimization," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0507, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    2. Wulf Gaertner & Richard Bradley & Yongsheng Xu & Lars Schwettmann, 2019. "Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
    4. Safra, Zvi & Samet, Dov, 2004. "An ordinal solution to bargaining problems with many players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 129-142, January.
    5. O. Tejada & M. Álvarez-Mozos, 2016. "Vertical syndication-proof competitive prices in multilateral assignment markets," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 20(4), pages 289-327, December.
    6. B. Dietzenbacher & A. Estévez-Fernández & P. Borm & R. Hendrickx, 2021. "Proportionality, equality, and duality in bankruptcy problems with nontransferable utility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 65-80, June.
    7. Calvo, Emilio & Peters, Hans, 2005. "Bargaining with ordinal and cardinal players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 20-33, July.
    8. Thomson, William, 2003. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-297, July.
    9. Paula González, 2020. "On the design of equity-oriented pharmaceutical copayments," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 179-202, June.
    10. Miglierina Enrico & Molho Elena & Rocca Matteo, 2004. "Well-posedness and scalarization in vector optimization," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0403, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    11. Marco Mariotti, 2003. "Even Allocations For Generalised Rationing Problems," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-10, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    12. Thomson, William, 2015. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-59.
    13. Dolf Talman & Zaifu Yang, 2012. "On a Parameterized System of Nonlinear Equations with Economic Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 644-671, August.
    14. Subramanian, S.V. & Subramanyam, Malavika A. & Selvaraj, Sakthivel & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2009. "Are self-reports of health and morbidities in developing countries misleading? Evidence from India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 260-265, January.
    15. World Bank, 2002. "Costa Rica : Social Spending and the Poor, Volume 1. Summary of Issues and Recommendations with Executive Summary," World Bank Publications - Reports 15330, The World Bank Group.
    16. Emin Karagözoğlu, 2014. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 299-318, June.
    17. Hernández-Hernández, M.E. & Kolokoltsov, V.N. & Toniazzi, L., 2017. "Generalised fractional evolution equations of Caputo type," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 184-196.
    18. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    19. Juan Moreno-Ternero & Antonio Villar, 2006. "The TAL-Family of Rules for Bankruptcy Problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27(2), pages 231-249, October.
    20. Lee, Hiro & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2005. "The impact of the US safeguard measures on Northeast Asian producers: General equilibrium assessments," MPRA Paper 82288, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multiobjective optimization; Approximate solution; Axiomatization; Utility theory; Multicriteria decision theory; C61; D70; 90C29; 91B06;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:decfin:v:31:y:2008:i:2:p:95-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.