IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/toueco/v23y2017i1p150-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The propensity to bargain while on a vacation

Author

Listed:
  • Metin Kozak

    (Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey)

  • Antónia Correia

    (CEFAGE, University of Algarve and Universidade Europeia, Portugal)

  • Giacomo Del Chiappa

    (University of Sassari & CRENoS, Italy; Senior Research Fellow, School of Tourism & Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

This article assesses how tourists’ bargaining motivations and attitudes moderate their willingness to return to Italy, where bargaining is perceived as one of the best ways to deal with sellers. A non-probability quota sampling technique was used to survey domestic tourists in Italy through an online questionnaire which encompassed 26 bargaining values and one item to measure the likelihood that the tourists would bargain at the same destination in the future. The data comprised a total of 812 observations. An order probit model and marginal effects were estimated to measure the tourists’ propensity to return to Italy for bargaining purposes. The study findings indicate that tourists’ propensity to return for bargaining purposes is taken with the awareness that they will not obtain what they expected; as a matter of fact, they are unlikely to care about the final result but instead engage in this behaviour to have fun.

Suggested Citation

  • Metin Kozak & Antónia Correia & Giacomo Del Chiappa, 2017. "The propensity to bargain while on a vacation," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 150-167, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:23:y:2017:i:1:p:150-167
    DOI: 10.5367/te.2015.0504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5367/te.2015.0504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5367/te.2015.0504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michaela Draganska & Daniel Klapper & Sofia B. Villas-Boas, 2010. "A Larger Slice or a Larger Pie? An Empirical Investigation of Bargaining Power in the Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 57-74, 01-02.
    2. Kim, Samuel Seongseop & Timothy, Dallen J. & Hwang, Jinsoo, 2011. "Understanding Japanese tourists’ shopping preferences using the Decision Tree Analysis method," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 544-554.
    3. Lo, Ada & Qu, Hailin, 2015. "A theoretical model of the impact of a bundle of determinants on tourists’ visiting and shopping intentions: A case of mainland Chinese tourists," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 231-243.
    4. Brucks, Merrie & Schurr, Paul H, 1990. "The Effects of Bargainable Attributes and Attribute Range Knowledge on Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(4), pages 409-419, March.
    5. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:8:p:771-781 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Fischer, Sven & Guth, Werner & Pull, Kerstin, 2007. "Is there as-if bargaining?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 546-560, August.
    8. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    9. Richard H. Thaler, 2008. "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 15-25, 01-02.
    10. Bearden, William O & Etzel, Michael J, 1982. "Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 183-194, September.
    11. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    12. Park, C Whan & Lessig, V Parker, 1977. "Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(2), pages 102-110, Se.
    13. Xiaohua Zeng & Srabana Dasgupta & Charles Weinberg, 2012. "How Good Are You at Getting a Lower Price? A Field Study of the US Automobile Market," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 255-274, June.
    14. Cox, Anthony D. & Cox, Dena & Anderson, Ronald D., 2005. "Reassessing the pleasures of store shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 250-259, March.
    15. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurélie & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2022. "“All you need is love” from product design value perception to luxury brand love: An integrated framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1463-1475.
    2. Davis, Lizhu & Hodges, Nancy, 2012. "Consumer shopping value: An investigation of shopping trip value, in-store shopping value and retail format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 229-239.
    3. Tarnanidis, Theodore & Owusu-Frimpong, Nana & Nwankwo, Sonny & Omar, Maktoba, 2015. "Why we buy? Modeling consumer selection of referents," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 24-36.
    4. Williams, Janine & Ashill, Nicholas & Thirkell, Peter, 2016. "How is value perceived by children?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5875-5885.
    5. Barbopoulos, Isak & Johansson, Lars-Olof, 2017. "The Consumer Motivation Scale: Development of a multi-dimensional and context-sensitive measure of consumption goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 118-126.
    6. Sammon, Rachel & Kwon, Kyoung-Nan, 2015. "Host׳s interpersonal influence on guests in a home sales party," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 32-38.
    7. Gong Sun & Wangshuai Wang & Zhiming Cheng & Jie Li & Junhua Chen, 2017. "The Intermediate Linkage Between Materialism and Luxury Consumption: Evidence from the Emerging Market of China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 475-487, May.
    8. Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Pierre Valette-Florence, 2022. "“All you need is love”. From product design value perception to luxury brand love: An integrated framework," Post-Print hal-03562015, HAL.
    9. Liao, Tze-Hsien, 2017. "Online shopping post-payment dissonance: Dissonance reduction strategy using online consumer social experiences," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 520-538.
    10. Amélia Maria Pinto Cunha Brandão & Hugo Eduardo Magalhães Barbedo, 2023. "Going (in)conspicuous: antecedents and moderators of luxury consumption," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 202-218, June.
    11. Amatulli, Cesare & Guido, Gianluigi & Nataraajan, Rajan, 2015. "Luxury purchasing among older consumers: exploring inferences about cognitive Age, status, and style motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1945-1952.
    12. Hiroyasu Furukawa & Koki Matsumura & Susumu Harada, 2019. "Effect of Consumption Values on Consumer Satisfaction and Brand Commitment: Investigating Functional, Emotional, Social, and Epistemic Values in the Running Shoes Market," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 158-168.
    13. Antonia Correia & Metin Kozak & Seongseop (Sam) Kim, 2018. "Luxury shopping orientations of mainland Chinese tourists in Hong Kong," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(1), pages 92-108, February.
    14. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    15. Simon G�chter & Arno Riedl, "undated". "Moral Property Rights in Bargaining," IEW - Working Papers 113, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    16. Mengyuan Zhou, 2019. "The Effect of the Source of Inheritance on Bequest Attitudes: Evidence from Japan," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2019-018, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    17. Park, JungKun & Ahn, Jiseon & Thavisay, Toulany & Ren, Tianbao, 2019. "Examining the role of anxiety and social influence in multi-benefits of mobile payment service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-149.
    18. Andreas Leibbrandt, 2016. "Behavioral Constraints on Pricing: Experimental Evidence on Price Discrimination and Customer Antagonism," CESifo Working Paper Series 6214, CESifo.
    19. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.
    20. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:23:y:2017:i:1:p:150-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.