IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/toueco/v16y2010i4p807-832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Properties and Survey Design of Visitor Spending Using Segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Ya-Yen Sun
  • Kam-Fai Wong
  • Hsien-Chung Lai

Abstract

Estimating visitor spending through the segmentation approach has several advantages in terms of policy evaluation, user management and sampling design. This approach generally relies on visitor surveys to estimate two parameters, average spending per segment and segment share, so that total visitation can be apportioned to each subgroup. Equivalently, this approach is to estimate the weighted average spending by taking into consideration the relative shares of each user segment. This paper first provides a statistical formula to compute the variance of weighted average spending by taking into account the stochastic nature of spending and segment shares. Second, simulation analysis is adopted to compare the accuracy and precision of the spending estimator based on different study designs. The results show that conducting additional short surveys to obtain information on user segments provides two advantages. First, it helps to reduce non-response bias since certain visitor groups have higher ratios of unreturned questionnaires, incomplete data or non-participation. Second, it helps to decrease the variance of the estimator so that the upper and lower bound of the confidence interval can be narrowed. The level of variance reduction will depend on the relative segment shares, the average spending, cases that are obtained, spending variation and the probability of giving full spending information across segments. The implications for survey design are offered in light of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Ya-Yen Sun & Kam-Fai Wong & Hsien-Chung Lai, 2010. "Statistical Properties and Survey Design of Visitor Spending Using Segmentation," Tourism Economics, , vol. 16(4), pages 807-832, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:16:y:2010:i:4:p:807-832
    DOI: 10.5367/te.2010.0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5367/te.2010.0013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5367/te.2010.0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pannell, David J., 1997. "Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: theoretical framework and practical strategies," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 139-152, May.
    2. John Loomis, 2007. "Correcting for On-Site Visitor Sampling Bias When Estimating the Regional Economic Effects of Tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 13(1), pages 41-47, March.
    3. Weiler, Stephan & Loomis, John & Richardson, Robby & Shwiff, Stephanie, 2002. "Driving Regional Economic Models with a Statistical Model: Hypothesis Testing for Economic Impact Analysis," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 32(1), pages 97-111, Winter/Sp.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincenzo Asero & Venera Tomaselli, 2015. "Research Note: Analysing Tourism Demand in Tourist Districts — The Case of Sicily," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(5), pages 1111-1119, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kopke, Emma & Kingwell, Ross S. & Young, John, 2005. "A farm-level economic assessment of the Australian Merino, Dohne Merino, and South African Meat Merino sheep breeds in southern Australia," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137934, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Karin Fierke & Antje Wiener, 1999. "Constructing Institutional Interests: EU and NATO Enlargement," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 14, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    3. Jackson, T.M. & Hanjra, Munir A. & Khan, S. & Hafeez, M.M., 2011. "Building a climate resilient farm: A risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 729-745.
    4. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    5. Bennett, Anne L. & Pannell, David J., 1998. "Economic evaluation of a weed-activated sprayer for herbicide application to patchy weed populations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-20.
    6. Stephen P. Chambal & Jeffery D. Weir & Yucel R. Kahraman & Alex J. Gutman, 2011. "A Practical Procedure for Customizable One-Way Sensitivity Analysis in Additive Value Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 303-321, December.
    7. Weiler, Stephan, 2006. "A park by any other name: National Park designation as a natural experiment in signaling," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 96-106, July.
    8. Chudleigh, Fred & Cox, Howard W. & Chapman, Veronica J., 2002. "Modelling profitable and sustainable farming systems in Central Queensland," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125070, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Sloane, Peter J, 2010. "Symposium 7: The Fair Work Australia Minimum Wage Decision Viewed From Afar," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 346-350.
    10. Smith, M, 2009. "Gender Pay Equity Reform in Australia: What is the Way Forward?," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 35(4), pages 652-670.
    11. Abdmouleh, Zeineb & Gastli, Adel & Ben-Brahim, Lazhar & Haouari, Mohamed & Al-Emadi, Nasser Ahmed, 2017. "Review of optimization techniques applied for the integration of distributed generation from renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 266-280.
    12. Eckard Rehbinder, 1997. "Environmental Agreements. A New Instrument of Environmental Policy," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 45, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    13. Amy Verdun, 1998. "The Role of the Delors Committee in the Creation of EMU: An Epistemic Community?," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 44, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    14. Abdul Latif & Arup Pramanik & Dulal Chandra Das & Israfil Hussain & Sudhanshu Ranjan, 2018. "Plug in hybrid vehicle-wind-diesel autonomous hybrid power system: frequency control using FA and CSA optimized controller," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 1147-1158, October.
    15. Roberts, Anna M. & Pannell, David J. & Doole, Graeme & Vigiak, Olga, 2012. "Agricultural land management strategies to reduce phosphorus loads in the Gippsland Lakes, Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 11-22.
    16. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R. & Fleming, Euan M. & Zhao, Xueyan, 2008. "Potential returns to the Australian sheep and wool industries from effective R&D and promotion investments and their sensitivities to assumed elasticity values," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 16.
    17. Liesio, Juuso & Mild, Pekka & Salo, Ahti, 2007. "Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1488-1505, September.
    18. Morteza Chalak & David J. Pannell, 2015. "Optimal Integrated Strategies to Control an Invasive Weed," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(3), pages 381-407, September.
    19. Rob Southwick & John Bergstrom & Clint Wall, 2009. "The Economic Contributions of Human-Powered Outdoor Recreation to the US Economy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 15(4), pages 709-733, December.
    20. Renaud Dehousse, 1998. "European Institutional Architecture after Amsterdam: Parliamentary System or Regulatory Structure?," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 11, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:toueco:v:16:y:2010:i:4:p:807-832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.