IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v91y2021i4d10.1007_s11238-021-09810-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘NEXT’ events: a cooperative game theoretic view to festivals

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Champarnaud

    (LEM (CNRS - UMR 9221), Université de Lille)

  • Amandine Ghintran

    (LEM (CNRS - UMR 9221), Université de Lille)

  • Frédéric Jouneau-Sion

    (Université de Lyon
    CNRS, GATE Lyon Saint-Etienne)

Abstract

During a cultural festival, artists and theaters act as a cartel by agreeing on pricing decisions that maximize the groups’ profit as a whole. We model the problem of sharing the profit created by a festival among organizing theaters as a cooperative game. In such a game, the worth of a coalition is defined as the theaters’ profit from the optimal fixation of prices. We show that this class of games is convex and we axiomatically characterize the Shapley value (Shapley 1953) for this class of games. We also provide an axiomatic basis for the downstream incremental solution. Finally, we apply this model to the NEXT festival, for which we have collected data. We propose an approach to derive the games’ vector from the data and we compute the different solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Champarnaud & Amandine Ghintran & Frédéric Jouneau-Sion, 2021. "‘NEXT’ events: a cooperative game theoretic view to festivals," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 517-548, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:91:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-021-09810-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-021-09810-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-021-09810-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-021-09810-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Haag & Roger Lagunoff, 2006. "Social Norms, Local Interaction, And Neighborhood Planning ," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 47(1), pages 265-296, February.
    2. Ginsburgh, Victor & Zang, Israel, 2003. "The museum pass game and its value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 322-325, May.
    3. R. Hiller, 2014. "Exclusive Dealing and Its Effects: The Impact of Large Music Festivals on Local Music Venues," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 45(2), pages 153-175, September.
    4. Joseph J. Spengler, 1950. "Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58, pages 347-347.
    5. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
    6. Louis Lévy-Garboua & Claude Montmarquette, 1996. "A microeconometric study of theatre demand," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 20(1), pages 25-50, March.
    7. Rene van den Brink & Arantza Estevez-Fernandez & Gerard van der Laan & Nigel Moes, 2011. "Independence Axioms for Water Allocation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-128/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Kaneko, Mamoru & Kimura, Toshiyuki, 1992. "Conventions, social prejudices and discrimination: A festival game with merrymakers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 511-527, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:26:y:2007:i:1:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Elisabetta Lazzaro & Carlofilippo Frateschi, 2017. "Couples’ arts participation: assessing individual and joint time use," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 47-69, February.
    3. Caterina Adelaide Mauri & Alexander Wolf, 2016. "Household Decisions on Arts Consumption: How Men Can Avoid the Ballet," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2016-36, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Pablo De la Vega & Sara Suarez-Fernández & David Boto-García & Juan Prieto-Rodríguez, 2020. "Playing a play: online and live performing arts consumers profiles and the role of supply constraints," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(3), pages 425-450, September.
    5. Karol Borowiecki & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez, 2015. "Video games playing: A substitute for cultural consumptions?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(3), pages 239-258, August.
    6. Masaki Katsuura, 2012. "Lead–lag relationship between household cultural expenditures and business cycles," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(1), pages 49-65, February.
    7. Caterina Adelaide Mauri & Alexander Friedrich Wolf, 2021. "Battle of the ballet household decisions on arts consumption," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 359-383, September.
    8. Marco Alderighi & Eleonora Lorenzini, 2012. "Cultural goods, cultivation of taste, satisfaction and increasing marginal utility during vacations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(1), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Lars Thiel, 2015. "Leave the Drama on the Stage: The Effect of Cultural Participation on Health," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 767, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    10. Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2020. "Choices on museum attendance: An agent‐based approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 882-897, November.
    11. Borowiecki, Karol J. & Bakhshi, Hasan, 2018. "Did you really take a hit? Understanding how video games playing affects individuals," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 313-326.
    12. Jose Ignacio Azuela Flores & Victor Fernandez-Blanco & Maria Jose Sanzo-Perez, 2012. "Movie reviews: Who are the readers?," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-03-2012, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised May 2012.
    13. Jose A Bermudez Trivino & Lina M Medina Hurtado & Luis Fernando Aguado Quintero, 2015. "Analyzing the decision to listen to recorded music. A microeconometric approach," Working Papers 3, Faculty of Economics and Management, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali.
    14. Bermúdez Triviño, José A. & Medina Hurtado, Lina M. & Aguado Quintero, Luis F., 2016. "La decisión de escuchar música grabada en Colombia. Un enfoque microeconométrico || The decision of listening to recorded music in Colombia. A microeconometric approach," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 21(1), pages 21-38, June.
    15. Elisabetta Lazzaro & Carlofilippo Frateschi, 2015. "Couples' arts participation: assessing individual and joint time use," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/185658, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Luis F. Aguado & Elisabetta Lazzaro & Luis A. Palma Martos & Ana M. Osorio Mejia, 2018. "Newspaper Reading as a Form of Cultural Participation: The Case of Colombia," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 11, pages 40-54, February.
    17. Camarero, Carmen & Garrido, María José & Vicente, Eva, 2010. "Components of art exhibition brand equity for internal and external visitors," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 495-504.
    18. Geng Chen & Pei Tang, 2021. "Similar but special: an econometric analysis of live performing arts attendance in mainland China," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 459-490, September.
    19. Concetta Castiglione, 2011. "The Demand for Theatre. A Microeconomic Approach to the Italian Case," Trinity Economics Papers tep0911, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    20. Victoria Ateca - Amestoy, 2007. "Cultural capital and demand," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 26(1), pages 1-9.
    21. Nadia Campaniello & Matteo Richiardi, 2011. "Beggar-thy-neighbor in Art Consumption: Evidence from the “Bel Paese”," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 116, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:91:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-021-09810-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.