Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Movie reviews: Who are the readers?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Jose Ignacio Azuela Flores

    ()
    (Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas (Mexico))

  • Victor Fernandez-Blanco

    ()
    (Departamento de Economia, Facultad de Economia y Empresa, Universidad de Oviedo)

  • Maria Jose Sanzo-Perez

    ()
    (Departamento de Administracion de Empresas, Facultad de Economia y Empresa, Universidad de Oviedo)

Abstract

The analysis of the relationship between movie reviews and consumer's decision process has focused mainly on the side of critics, who have been defined as "influencers" or as "predictors" (Eliashberg & Shugan, 1997). Also, new ways to measure the impact of the critic have been introduced (Gemser, van Oostrum & Leenders, 2007) and the consistency of their opinions over time has been proved (Ginsburgh & Weyers, 1999). However, there is scarce evidence about the readers of movie reviews: who are they and what is their profile. The objective of this paper is to fill this gap. Using information of Spanish consumers, we estimate a nested logit model that identifies movie review readers. The preliminary results suggest that movie review readers are mainly employed young women without family responsibilities

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.culturaleconomics.org/awp/AWP-03-2012.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by the Association for Cultural Economics International in its series ACEI Working Paper Series with number AWP-03-2012.

as in new window
Length: 23 pages
Date of creation: May 2012
Date of revision: May 2012
Handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-03-2012

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.culturaleconomics.org/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: critics; movie reviews; critic readers; influenced; predicted;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Victor Ginsburgh & Sheila Weyers, 1999. "On the Perceived Quality of Movies," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 269-283, November.
  2. Peter Boatwright & Suman Basuroy & Wagner Kamakura, 2007. "Reviewing the reviewers: The impact of individual film critics on box office performance," Quantitative Marketing and Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 401-425, December.
  3. Gary S. Becker, 1975. "Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, 2nd ed," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number beck75-1, October.
  4. Louis Lévy-Garboua & Claude Montmarquette, 1996. "A microeconometric study of theatre demand," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 25-50, March.
  5. David A. Reinstein & Christopher M. Snyder, 2005. "THE INFLUENCE OF EXPERT REVIEWS ON CONSUMER DEMAND FOR EXPERIENCE GOODS: A CASE STUDY OF MOVIE CRITICS -super-* ," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 27-51, 03.
  6. S. Ravid & John Wald & Suman Basuroy, 2006. "Distributors and film critics: does it take two to Tango?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 201-218, December.
  7. Ravid, S Abraham, 1999. "Information, Blockbusters, and Stars: A Study of the Film Industry," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(4), pages 463-92, October.
  8. Ana Suárez-Vázquez, 2011. "Critic power or star power? The influence of hallmarks of quality of motion pictures: an experimental approach," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 119-135, May.
  9. Gerda Gemser & Martine Oostrum & Mark Leenders, 2007. "The impact of film reviews on the box office performance of art house versus mainstream motion pictures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 43-63, March.
  10. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
  11. David Throsby, 1999. "Cultural Capital," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-12, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-03-2012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Juan Prieto-Rodriguez).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.