Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The museum pass game and its value

Contents:

Author Info

  • Ginsburgh, Victor
  • Zang, Israel

Abstract

We discuss a subscription game in which service providers (e.g., museums)team up in offering a limited time subscription or access pass allowing unlimited usage of their services. In this game, a natural way to allocate the subscription income among the service providers is by using the Shapley value. We show that, for the particular game considered,the Shapley value takes a very intuitive and computationally simple form.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WFW-488VX30-1/2/1bf73c482309cfafb17c1a88b35b4846
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Games and Economic Behavior.

Volume (Year): 43 (2003)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Pages: 322-325

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:43:y:2003:i:2:p:322-325

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622836

Related research

Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Béal, Sylvain & Solal, Philippe, 2009. "Allocation rules for museum pass programs," MPRA Paper 20103, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  2. Estevez Fernandez, M.A. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2004. ""The Museum Pass Game and its Value" Revisited," Discussion Paper 2004-7, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  3. Frey, Bruno S. & Meier, Stephan, 2006. "The Economics of Museums," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Elsevier.
  4. Victor Ginsburgh & ISRAEL Zang, 2007. "Bundling by competitors and the sharing of profits," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/7280, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  5. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2013. "The axiomatic approach to the problem of sharing the revenue from bundled pricing," Working Papers 13.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  6. Arantza Estevez-Fernandez & Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers, 2010. "A Note on Passepartout Problems," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-031/1, Tinbergen Institute.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:43:y:2003:i:2:p:322-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.