IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p1967-d116832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Peer Firms Affect Firm Corporate Social Responsibility?

Author

Listed:
  • Shenggang Yang

    (The College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University, Changsha 410006, China)

  • Heng Ye

    (The College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University, Changsha 410006, China)

  • Qi Zhu

    (Guotai Junan Securities Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China
    The School of Economics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Peer-firm strategies are a critical factor for corporate finance, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the main trend for evaluating the behavior of firms. On the basis of the connection between peer strategy and CSR, this paper explores the CSR strategies employed by a sample of Chinese firms during the 2008–2015 period. Our two main empirical findings are as follows. First, the CSR strategies of firms have a positive effect on their CSR behavior. Second, when there is the CSR gap between firms and peer firms, firms will feel the pressure from stakeholders and the public and improve the level of CSR performance. Our paper enriches empirical research on the CSR behavior of Chinese firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenggang Yang & Heng Ye & Qi Zhu, 2017. "Do Peer Firms Affect Firm Corporate Social Responsibility?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1967-:d:116832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1967/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1967/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matjaž Črnigoj & Dušan Mramor, 2015. "Alternative corporate governance paradigm and corporate financing: Capital structure decisions in employee-governed firms," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 65(2), pages 271-297, June.
    2. Charles F. Manski, 1993. "Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 531-542.
    3. William A. Brock, 1993. "Pathways to randomness in the economy: Emergent nonlinearity and chaos in economics and finance," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 8(1), pages 3-55.
    4. Scharfstein, David S & Stein, Jeremy C, 1990. "Herd Behavior and Investment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(3), pages 465-479, June.
    5. Mark T. Leary & Michael R. Roberts, 2014. "Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 139-178, February.
    6. Pan, Lee-Hsien & Lin, Chien-Ting & Lee, Shih-Cheng & Ho, Kung-Cheng, 2015. "Information ratings and capital structure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-32.
    7. Morten Huse & Sabina Nielsen & Inger Hagen, 2009. "Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 581-597, November.
    8. Conlisk, John, 1980. "Costly optimizers versus cheap imitators," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 275-293, September.
    9. Ding, Weili & Lehrer, Steven F., 2014. "Understanding the role of time-varying unobserved ability heterogeneity in education production," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 55-75.
    10. Sushil Bikhchandani & David Hirshleifer & Ivo Welch, 1998. "Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 151-170, Summer.
    11. Stephen Bear & Noushi Rahman & Corinne Post, 2010. "The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 207-221, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kun Su, 2019. "Does religion benefit corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1206-1221, November.
    2. Qiang Liu & Guoqing Ge & Chong Ning & Xiaobo Tao & Yongbo Sun, 2018. "Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Feng Wei & Binyan Ding & Yu Kong, 2017. "Female Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Environmental Investment of Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. José Manuel Santos‐Jaén & Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro & Domingo García‐Pérez‐de‐Lema, 2021. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The mediating role of debt terms and human capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1200-1215, July.
    5. Yongjun Tang & Jun Zhu & Wenchao Ma & Mengxue Zhao, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Institutional Pressure on Carbon Information Disclosure: The Mediating Effect of Enterprise Peer Influence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Wenli Zhao & Guangyu Ye & Guangyi Xu & Chong Liu & Dandan Deng & Ming Huang, 2022. "CSR and Long-Term Corporate Performance: The Moderating Effects of Government Subsidies and Peer Firm’s CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Rilla Gantino, 2020. "Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility on Performance, a Comparison Model of Listed Companies in Indonesia," GATR Journals afr192, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Yongzhi Qi & Yuchen Chai & Yifan Jiang, 2021. "Threshold effect of government subsidy, corporate social responsibility and brand value using the data of China’s top 500 most valuable brands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Feng, Yumei & Pan, Yuying & Wang, Lu & Sensoy, Ahmet, 2021. "The voice of minority shareholders: Online voting and corporate social responsibility," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    10. Ana León-Gómez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 831-866, September.
    11. Xiangyu Chen & Peng Wan, 2020. "Social trust and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 485-500, March.
    12. Bansal, Sangeeta & Khanna, Madhu & Sydlowski, Joseph, 2021. "Incentives for corporate social responsibility in India: Mandate, peer pressure and crowding-out effects," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Su-In Kim & Hyejeong Shin & Heejeong Shin & Sorah Park, 2019. "Organizational Slack, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Yi Zhang & Qianqian Shang & Chun Liu, 2018. "FDI Spillovers on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Channel of Labor Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Fernando Gimeno-Arias & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano & Héctor Horacio Garza-Sánchez, 2021. "Using PLS-SEM to Analyze the Effect of CSR on Corporate Performance: The Mediating Role of Human Resources Management and Customer Satisfaction. An Empirical Study in the Spanish Food and Beverage Man," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Jesús Ángel Del Brío & Edmundo Lizarzaburu Bolaños, 2018. "CSR Actions in Companies and Perception of Their Reputation by Managers: Analysis in the Rural Area of an Emerging Country in the Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Yoshida, Kenichi & Iino, Yoshiaki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2022. "Do Japanese keiretsu promote better CSR activities?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 452-475.
    18. Josefina Fernández-Guadaño & Jesús H. Sarria-Pedroza, 2018. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Value Creation from a Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Kwangho & Yang, Insun & Yang, Taeyong, 2017. "The peer-firm effect on firm’s investment decisions," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 178-199.
    2. Wei He & Qian Wang, 2020. "The peer effect of corporate financial decisions around split share structure reform in China," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 474-493, July.
    3. Jiali Liu & Xinran Xie & Yu Duan & Liang Tang, 2023. "Peer effects and the mechanisms in corporate capital structure: evidence from Chinese listed firms," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 295-326, March.
    4. Hsu, Yuan-Teng & Huang, Chia-Wei & Koedijk, Kees G., 2023. "Unintended consequences of compensation peer groups on corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Margaretic, Paula & Cifuentes, Rodrigo & Carreño, José Gabriel, 2021. "Banks’ interconnections and peer effects: Evidence from Chile," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Liu, Yongda & Padgett, Carol & Yin, Chao, 2022. "Internal information quality and financial policy peer effects," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Ali-Rind, Asad & Boubaker, Sabri & Jarjir, Souad Lajili, 2023. "Peer effects in financial economics: A literature survey," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Ye, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Shunming & Zheng, Jiefei, 2023. "The peer effects of PIPEs," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 156-172.
    9. Francis, Bill & Hasan, Iftekhar & Mani, Sureshbabu & Ye, Pengfei, 2016. "Relative peer quality and firm performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 196-219.
    10. Adhikari, Binay K. & Agrawal, Anup, 2018. "Peer influence on payout policies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 615-637.
    11. Xiaoxu Zhang & Xinyu Du, 2023. "Industry and Regional Peer Effects in Corporate Digital Transformation: The Moderating Effects of TMT Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Chen, Mingqin & Xie, Jing & Li, Yue, 2022. "Heterogeneity of dividend smoothing: A strategic response to peer competition in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. M. Cecilia Bustamante & Laurent Frésard, 2021. "Does Firm Investment Respond to Peers’ Investment?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4703-4724, August.
    14. Dimant, Eugen, 2015. "On Peer Effects: Behavioral Contagion of (Un)Ethical Behavior and the Role of Social Identity," MPRA Paper 68732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Paul Décaire & Erik P. Gilje & Jérôme P. Taillard, 2019. "Real Option Exercise: Empirical Evidence," NBER Working Papers 25624, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Lee, Chi-Chuan & Zeng, Jhih-Hong & Hsu, Yu-Ling, 2017. "Peer bank behavior, economic policy uncertainty, and leverage decision of financial institutions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 79-91.
    17. Zhuang, Yuan & Nie, Jing & Wu, Weixing, 2022. "Peer influence and the value of cash holdings," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 265-284.
    18. Zhen Peng & Yujun Lian & Joseph A. Forson, 2021. "Peer effects in R&D investment policy: Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4516-4533, July.
    19. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2008. "Thought and Behavior Contagion in Capital Markets," MPRA Paper 9164, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Peng, Zhen & Lian, Yujun & Forson, Joseph Ato, 2017. "Peer Effects in R&D Investment Policy: Evidence from China," MPRA Paper 102394, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Jun 2019.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1967-:d:116832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.