IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3301-d1064949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kerbside Parking Assessment Using a Simulation Modelling Approach for Infrastructure Planning—A Metropolitan City Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Premaratne Samaranayake

    (School of Business, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Upul Gunawardana

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Michael Stokoe

    (Freight and Servicing, Sydney Coordination Office, Transport for NSW, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of kerbside parking demand and provision on short-term parking (STP) and freight activity space (FAS) as a benchmark for infrastructure planning, considering the impacts of expected future growth and capacity changes. In this study, we adopted a mixed-methods approach of quantitative analysis including a spatial view of parking using manual and video-captured camera data from the majority of STP and FAS parking bays covering a diverse range of loads/tasks with different levels of elasticity and substitutes, as well as simulation of current demand influenced by various factors, as a basis for the development of strategies and prioritisation of the allocation of limited kerbside spaces in Parramatta, a rapidly transforming/growing CBD city centre environment. Parking demand consisted of a diverse range of FAS and STP categories. Spatial analysis showed a non-homogeneous distribution of parking demand and loads across several sections of the city. A large proportion of short-term parking spaces is attributed to two peak periods during the day and increased traffic volumes at peak times. Comparatively lower average parking times in the northern and western regions compared to those in the city centre indicate the potential to reduce peak parking periods and therefore traffic congestion in the city centre by changing parking limits. The presented simulation model can be used as a reliable benchmarking model for the simulation of future impact scenarios and to make recommendations with respect to infrastructure planning and to develop travel demand management strategies. This research is based on a case study and is therefore subject to limitations in its applications in other contexts. Extension of the baseline simulation with future impact scenarios is planned for the next stage of this research. A simulation model is presented and illustrated as a reliable benchmarking tool for the simulation of future impact scenarios through a case study of a rapidly changing city environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Premaratne Samaranayake & Upul Gunawardana & Michael Stokoe, 2023. "Kerbside Parking Assessment Using a Simulation Modelling Approach for Infrastructure Planning—A Metropolitan City Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3301-:d:1064949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinyuan Chen & Zhiyuan Liu & Graham Currie, 2016. "Optimizing location and capacity of rail-based Park-and-Ride sites to increase public transport usage," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 507-526, July.
    2. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren & Rowse, John, 2015. "Downtown curbside parking capacity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-97.
    3. van Ommeren, Jos & Wentink, Derk & Dekkers, Jasper, 2011. "The real price of parking policy," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 25-31, July.
    4. van Ommeren, Jos & Russo, Giovanni, 2014. "Time-varying parking prices," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 166-174.
    5. Jean Paul Rodrigue & Laetitia Dablanc & Genevieve Giuliano, 2017. "The Freight Landscape: Convergence and Divergence in Urban Freight Distribution," Post-Print hal-01519779, HAL.
    6. Joana Cavadas & António Pais Antunes, 2019. "Optimization-based study of the location of park-and-ride facilities," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 201-226, April.
    7. Shoup, Donald C., 2006. "Cruising for Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt55s7079f, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Zou, Bo & Kafle, Nabin & Wolfson, Ouri & Lin, Jie (Jane), 2015. "A mechanism design based approach to solving parking slot assignment in the information era," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 631-653.
    9. Premaratne Samaranayake & Upul Gunawardana, 2022. "Parking Assessment in the Context of Growing Construction Activity and Infrastructure Changes: Simulation of Impact Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Rodier, Caroline J & Shaheen, Susan A & Eaken, Amanda M, 2005. "Transit-Based Smart Parking in the San Francisco Bay Area, California: Assessment of User Demand and Behavioral Effects," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3kw2x3x8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Shoup, Donald C., 1999. "The trouble with minimum parking requirements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 549-574.
    12. Levy, Nadav & Render, Marc & Benenson, Itzhak, 2015. "Spatially explicit modeling of parking search as a tool for urban parking facilities and policy assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 9-20.
    13. Lehner, Stephan & Peer, Stefanie, 2019. "The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 177-191.
    14. Gragera, Albert & Albalate, Daniel, 2016. "The impact of curbside parking regulation on garage demand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 160-168.
    15. Piccioni, Cristiana & Valtorta, Marco & Musso, Antonio, 2019. "Investigating effectiveness of on-street parking pricing schemes in urban areas: An empirical study in Rome," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 136-147.
    16. Arnott, Richard & Rowse, John, 2013. "Curbside parking time limits," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 89-110.
    17. Fanyu Meng & Yuchuan Du & Yuen Chong Li & S. C. Wong, 2018. "Modeling heterogeneous parking choice behavior on university campuses," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 154-169, February.
    18. Mikhail Chester & Andrew Fraser & Juan Matute & Carolyn Flower & Ram Pendyala, 2015. "Parking Infrastructure: A Constraint on or Opportunity for Urban Redevelopment? A Study of Los Angeles County Parking Supply and Growth," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(4), pages 268-286, October.
    19. Wang, Rui & Yuan, Quan, 2013. "Parking practices and policies under rapid motorization: The case of China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 109-116.
    20. Su, Wencong & Chow, Mo-Yuen, 2012. "Computational intelligence-based energy management for a large-scale PHEV/PEV enabled municipal parking deck," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 171-182.
    21. Ottosson, Dadi Baldur & Chen, Cynthia & Wang, Tingting & Lin, Haiyun, 2013. "The sensitivity of on-street parking demand in response to price changes: A case study in Seattle, WA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 222-232.
    22. Wang, James J. & Liu, Qian, 2014. "Understanding the parking supply mechanism in China: a case study of Shenzhen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 77-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    2. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas & Hologa, Rafael & Riach, Nils & Freytag, Tim, 2022. "Parking violations as an economic gamble for public space," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 248-257.
    3. Francis Ostermeijer & Hans RA Koster & Leonardo Nunes & Jos van Ommeren, 2021. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-015/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Premaratne Samaranayake & Upul Gunawardana, 2022. "Parking Assessment in the Context of Growing Construction Activity and Infrastructure Changes: Simulation of Impact Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Krishnamurthy, Chandra Kiran B. & Ngo, Nicole S., 2020. "The effects of smart-parking on transit and traffic: Evidence from SFpark," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Kevin Hasker & Eren Inci, 2014. "Free Parking For All In Shopping Malls," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1281-1304, November.
    7. de Groote, Jesper & van Ommeren, Jos & Koster, Hans R.A., 2019. "The effect of paid parking and bicycle subsidies on employees’ parking demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 46-58.
    8. Ostermeijer, Francis & Koster, Hans & Nunes, Leonardo & van Ommeren, Jos, 2022. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Groote, Jesper De & Ommeren, Jos Van & Koster, Hans R.A., 2016. "Car ownership and residential parking subsidies: Evidence from Amsterdam," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 25-37.
    10. Lehner, Stephan & Peer, Stefanie, 2019. "The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 177-191.
    11. Inci, Eren & Lindsey, Robin, 2015. "Garage and curbside parking competition with search congestion," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 49-59.
    12. Ardeshiri, Ali & Safarighouzhdi, Farshid & Hossein Rashidi, Taha, 2021. "Measuring willingness to pay for shared parking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 186-202.
    13. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren & Rowse, John, 2015. "Downtown curbside parking capacity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-97.
    14. Eren Inci & Jos van Ommeren & Martijn Kobus, 2017. "The external cruising costs of parking," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1301-1323.
    15. Arnott, Richard, 2014. "On the optimal target curbside parking occupancy rate," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 133-144.
    16. Taylor, Elizabeth Jean, 2020. "Parking policy: The politics and uneven use of residential parking space in Melbourne," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Albalate, Daniel & Gragera, Albert, 2017. "The determinants of garage prices and their interaction with curbside regulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 86-97.
    18. Andrés Rodríguez & Luigi dell’Olio & José Luis Moura & Borja Alonso & Rubén Cordera, 2023. "Modelling Parking Choice Behaviour Considering Alternative Availability and Systematic and Random Variations in User Tastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Jun Li & Sifan Wu & Xiaoman Feng, 2021. "Optimization of On-Street Parking Charges Based on Price Elasticity of the Expected Perceived Parking Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Geva, Sharon & Fulman, Nir & Ben-Elia, Eran, 2022. "Getting the prices right: Drivers' cruising choices in a serious parking game," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 54-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3301-:d:1064949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.