IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p586-d1018911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy on Fitness Use Innovativeness and Usage Pattern

Author

Listed:
  • Theeralak Satjawathee

    (International College for Interdisciplinary Studies, Payap University, Super-Highway Chiang Mai-Lumpang Road, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand)

  • Shang-Chun Ma

    (Institute of Physical Education, Health & Leisure Studies, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan)

  • Shih-Tung Shu

    (International College for Interdisciplinary Studies, Payap University, Super-Highway Chiang Mai-Lumpang Road, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand)

  • Ching-Hung Chang

    (Department of Kinesiology, Health, and Leisure Studies, National University of Kaohsiung, 700, Kaohsiung University Rd., Nanzih District, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan)

Abstract

Marketing researchers agree that use innovativeness leads to variety-seeking behavior in service usage in service contexts. As fitness consumers are high-frequency users, user behavior can be enriched by exploring the moderating effect of self-efficacy. This study explores the moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between fitness use innovativeness and usage patterns (usage variety and usage frequency), and investigates their mediation effects on satisfaction and revisit intention. A sample of 234 participants from one of the largest public fitness centers was employed to test the conceptual framework. The findings show that fitness use innovativeness has a positive relationship with usage variety but has no effect on usage frequency. However, self-efficacy demonstrated its moderation effects on the relationships between fitness use innovativeness and usage variety and usage frequency. The evidence of the moderation effect of self-efficacy conforms to the theory of the use-diffusion model. We finally developed a matrix of fitness innovators to illustrate related managerial implications for each segment.

Suggested Citation

  • Theeralak Satjawathee & Shang-Chun Ma & Shih-Tung Shu & Ching-Hung Chang, 2022. "The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy on Fitness Use Innovativeness and Usage Pattern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:586-:d:1018911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    2. Hightower, Roscoe Jr & Brady, Michael K. & Baker, Thomas L., 2002. "Investigating the role of the physical environment in hedonic service consumption: an exploratory study of sporting events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 697-707, September.
    3. García-Fernández, Jerónimo & Gálvez-Ruíz, Pablo & Fernández-Gavira, Jesús & Vélez-Colón, Luisa & Pitts, Brenda & Bernal-García, Ainara, 2018. "The effects of service convenience and perceived quality on perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty in low-cost fitness centers," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 250-262.
    4. A. Ferrand & L. Robinson & Pierre Valette-Florence, 2010. "The Intention-to-repurchase Paradox: A case of the Health and Fitness Industry," Post-Print halshs-00325142, HAL.
    5. Maxham, James III, 2001. "Service recovery's influence on consumer satisfaction, positive word-of-mouth, and purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 11-24, October.
    6. Son, Minhee & Han, Kyesook, 2011. "Beyond the technology adoption: Technology readiness effects on post-adoption behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1178-1182.
    7. Jerónimo García-Fernández & Pablo Gálvez-Ruíz & Jesús Fernández-Gavira & Luisa Vélez-Colón & Brenda Pitts & Ainara Bernal-García, 2018. "The effects of service convenience and perceived quality on perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty in low-cost fitness centers," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 250-262, July.
    8. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    9. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ersin Eskiler & Remzi Altunışık, 2021. "The Moderating Effect of Involvement in the Relationship Between Customer Behavioral Intentions and Its Antecedents," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    2. Domina, Tanya & Lee, Seung-Eun & MacGillivray, Maureen, 2012. "Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 613-620.
    3. Manuel Jesús Baena-Arroyo & Jerónimo García-Fernández & Pablo Gálvez-Ruiz & Moisés Grimaldi-Puyana, 2020. "Analyzing Consumer Loyalty through Service Experience and Service Convenience: Differences between Instructor Fitness Classes and Virtual Fitness Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Jerónimo García-Fernández & Jesús Fernández-Gavira & Antonio Jesús Sánchez-Oliver & Pablo Gálvez-Ruíz & Moisés Grimaldi-Puyana & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrión, 2020. "Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) to Evaluate Servicescape Fitness Consumer by Gender and Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Markus Blut & Cheng Wang, 2020. "Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 649-669, July.
    6. Josep Crespo Hervás & Vicente Prado-Gascó & María Huertas González-Serrano, 2020. "Perceived Value in Sporting Events (PVSP): A Further Step for the Strategic Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Perez-Aranda, Javier & González Robles, Eva M. & Alarcón Urbistondo, Pilar, 2023. "Understanding antecedents of continuance and revisit intentions: The case of sport apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.
    9. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Vo, Nguyen S. & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Vinh Hoang & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2021. "What makes passengers continue using and talking positively about ride-hailing services? The role of the booking app and post-booking service quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 367-384.
    10. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Kerr Lorenzo Picazo & Kim Aaron Salvador & Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja & Yoshiki B. Kurata & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Reny Nadlifatin & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira , 2021. "Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J., 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 587-605, December.
    12. Ozgur Yayla & Arif Aytekin & Fatih Uslu & Gozde Seval Ergun & Huseyin Keles & Yigit Guven, 2023. "How Does the Experience Quality of Recreational Activities Organized within the Scope of Public Health Affect Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions of Individuals?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Lam, Shun Yin & Chiang, Jeongwen & Parasuraman, A., 2008. "The effects of the dimensions of technology readiness on technology acceptance: An empirical analysis," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 19-39.
    14. Jairo León-Quismondo & Jorge García-Unanue & Pablo Burillo, 2020. "Best Practices for Fitness Center Business Sustainability: A Qualitative Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Lin, Zhibin & Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "Airline passengers’ continuance intention towards online check-in services: The role of personal innovativeness and subjective knowledge," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 158-168.
    16. Jiang, Yi & Lai, Po-Lin & Yang, Ching-Chiao & Wang, Xinchen, 2023. "Exploring the factors that drive consumers to use contactless delivery services in the context of the continued COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Muhammad Ilyas & Arif ud din & Muhammad Haleem & Irshad Ahmad, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurial acceptance: an examination of technology acceptance model and do-it-yourself behavior," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Kathrin Dudenhöffer, 2013. "Why electric vehicles failed," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 95-124, July.
    19. Paloma Escamilla-Fajardo & Mario Alguacil & Ana M. Gómez-Tafalla, 2021. "Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Passion for Work on Performance Variables in Sports Clubs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Zhong, Yongping & Oh, Segu & Moon, Hee Cheol, 2021. "Service transformation under industry 4.0: Investigating acceptance of facial recognition payment through an extended technology acceptance model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:586-:d:1018911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.