IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3641-d775363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Anassaya Chawviang

    (Information Technology Management, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Supaporn Kiattisin

    (Information Technology Management, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand)

Abstract

A smart co-operative refers to a co-operative that aims to apply ICT to provide better services and increase management efficiency to meet organizations’ goals through the combinations of ICT technology and business. In this paper, we propose the sustainable development smart co-operative framework, which specifically applies to all types of co-operatives which use information technology in their organization, enabling transformation to improve their services, management, and governance. In addition, we discuss ICT channel creation for improving knowledge, awareness, democracy, and the participation of members, a process in which IT contributes to the accessibility of members and communication between the co-operative, members, and stakeholders. The element design of this proposed framework has considered three key principles, which are (1) smart members, (2) the smart economy, and (3) smart governance. A smart co-operative is a term used to extend the concept of a smart city into co-operative organization to promote a sustainable development approach in the co-operative sector. Therefore, the smart co-operative combines ICT, smart concepts, co-operative business aspects, business models, and innovation. The findings suggest that the smart and sustainable development co-operative framework is suitable for co-operatives, providing a comprehensive framework for value creation through the smart co-operative concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Anassaya Chawviang & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3641-:d:775363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Payne & Pennie Frow & Andreas Eggert, 2017. "The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 467-489, July.
    2. Qiao Liang & George Hendrikse & Zuhui Huang & Xuchu Xu, 2015. "Governance Structure of Chinese Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence From Zhejiang Province," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 198-214, April.
    3. Ciuchita, Robert & Mahr, Dominik & Odekerken-Schröder, Gaby, 2019. "“Deal with it”: How coping with e-service innovation affects the customer experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 130-141.
    4. Montree Thirasakthana & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2021. "Sustainable Government Enterprise Architecture Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Nair, Rajiv & Muttakin, Mohammad & Khan, Arifur & Subramaniam, Nava & Somanath, V.S., 2019. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial transparency: Evidence from India," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-351.
    6. Stephen P Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Kirsty Strokosch, 2016. "Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 639-653, May.
    7. Arnold, Vicky & Benford, Tanya & Canada, Joseph & Sutton, Steve G., 2015. "Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Roberto Garcia Alonso & Sebastian Lippez-De Castro, 2016. "Technology Helps, People Make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded in Deliberative Democracy," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: J. Ramon Gil-Garcia & Theresa A. Pardo & Taewoo Nam (ed.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, edition 1, pages 333-347, Springer.
    9. Abraham, Rene & Schneider, Johannes & vom Brocke, Jan, 2019. "Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 424-438.
    10. Teresa Nelson & Dylan Nelson & Benjamin Huybrechts & Frédéric Dufays & Noreen O’Shea & Giorgia Trasciani, 2016. "Emergent identity formation and the co-operative: theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3-4), pages 286-309, March.
    11. David Le Blanc, 2020. "E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends," Working Papers 163, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    12. Felippe Cronemberger & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2019. "Big Data and Analytics as Strategies to Generate Public Value in Smart Cities: Proposing an Integrative Framework," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Manuel Pedro Rodriguez Bolivar (ed.), Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities, chapter 0, pages 247-267, Springer.
    13. Gabriela Viale Pereira & Maria Alexandra Cunha & Thomas J. Lampoltshammer & Peter Parycek & Maurício Gregianin Testa, 2017. "Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 526-553, July.
    14. Luo, Jianli & Guo, Hongdong & Jia, Fu, 2017. "Technological innovation in agricultural co-operatives in China: Implications for agro-food innovation policies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 19-33.
    15. Steven De Haes & Wim Van Grembergen & Anant Joshi & Tim Huygh, 2020. "Enterprise Governance of Information Technology," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 3, number 978-3-030-25918-1, December.
    16. Zsuzsanna Tomor & Albert Meijer & Ank Michels & Stan Geertman, 2019. "Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 3-27, October.
    17. Riggins, Frederick J. & Klamm, Bonnie K., 2017. "Data governance case at KrauseMcMahon LLP in an era of self-service BI and Big Data," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 23-36.
    18. Becchetti, Leonardo & Ciciretti, Rocco & Paolantonio, Adriana, 2016. "The cooperative bank difference before and after the global financial crisis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 224-246.
    19. Lin, Yanliu, 2018. "A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 800-809.
    20. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2020. "Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1343-1360, October.
    21. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    22. Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos & María de la O. Barroso, 0. "Analysing the links between cooperative principles, entrepreneurial orientation and performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    23. C. L. Yobe & S. R. D. Ferrer & M. Mudhara, 2020. "Measuring the financial efficiency of agricultural cooperatives in South Africa: an application of the Simar–Wilson methodology," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(3), pages 269-286, July.
    24. Stratu-Strelet, Doina & Gil-Gómez, Hermenegildo & Oltra-Badenes, Raúl & Oltra-Gutierrez, Juan Vicente, 2021. "Critical factors in the institutionalization of e-participation in e-government in Europe: Technology or leadership?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    25. van den Broek, Tijs & van Veenstra, Anne Fleur, 2018. "Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 330-338.
    26. Sheng, Jie & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "A multidisciplinary perspective of big data in management research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 97-112.
    27. Steven Haes & Wim Grembergen, 2015. "Enterprise Governance of IT," Management for Professionals, in: Enterprise Governance of Information Technology, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 11-43, Springer.
    28. Thays A. Oliveira & Miquel Oliver & Helena Ramalhinho, 2020. "Challenges for Connecting Citizens and Smart Cities: ICT, E-Governance and Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    29. Wilmer Rivas-Asanza & Jennifer Celleri-Pacheco & Javier Andrade-Garda & Rafael García-Vázquez & Virginia Mato-Abad & Santiago Rodríguez-Yáñez & Sonia Suárez-Garaboa, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability in Information Technologies Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    30. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    31. Manita, Riadh & Elommal, Najoua & Baudier, Patricia & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2020. "The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    32. Steven Haes & Wim Grembergen, 2015. "COBIT as a Framework for Enterprise Governance of IT," Management for Professionals, in: Enterprise Governance of Information Technology, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 103-128, Springer.
    33. McKillop, Donal & French, Declan & Quinn, Barry & Sobiech, Anna L. & Wilson, John O.S., 2020. "Cooperative financial institutions: A review of the literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    34. Teresa Nelson & Dylan Nelson & Benjamin Huybrechts & Frédéric Dufays & Noreen O'Shea & Giorgia Trasciani, 2016. "Emergent identity formation and the co-operative : theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms," Post-Print hal-02312324, HAL.
    35. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    36. Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos & María de la O. Barroso, 2020. "Analysing the links between cooperative principles, entrepreneurial orientation and performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1075-1089, December.
    37. Hafizah Hammad Ahmad Khan & Mahazril 'Aini Yaacob & Hussin Abdullah & Siti Hajar Abu Bakar Ah, 2016. "Factors affecting performance of co-operatives in Malaysia," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(5), pages 641-671, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Ivo Silva-da-Nóbrega & Adriana Fumi Chim-Miki & Marysol Castillo-Palacio, 2022. "A Smart Campus Framework: Challenges and Opportunities for Education Based on the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anassaya Chawviang & Supaporn Kiattisin & Montree Thirasakthana & Theeraya Mayakul, 2023. "A Smart Co-Operative Management Framework Based on an EA Concept for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Faridzah Jamaluddin & Norman Mohd Saleh & Azizah Abdullah & Mohamat Sabri Hassan & Noradiva Hamzah & Romlah Jaffar & Sarah Aziz Abdul Ghani Aziz & Zaini Embong, 2023. "Cooperative Governance and Cooperative Performance: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    3. Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah & Nurmala, N. & Rouli, Juliana & Herdiansyah, Herdis, 2022. "Analyzing the factors that influence the seeking and sharing of information on the smart city digital platform: Empirical evidence from Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Monika Wawer & Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow, 2022. "Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Karimikia, Hadi & Bradshaw, Robert & Singh, Harminder & Ojo, Adegboyega & Donnellan, Brian & Guerin, Michael, 2022. "An emergent taxonomy of boundary spanning in the smart city context – The case of smart Dublin," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Paula Bajdor & Marta Starostka-Patyk, 2021. "Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Seunghwan Myeong & Syed Asad Abbas Bokhari, 2023. "Building Participative E-Governance in Smart Cities: Moderating Role of Institutional and Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Modina, Michele & Pietrovito, Filomena & Gallucci, Carmen & Formisano, Vincenzo, 2023. "Predicting SMEs’ default risk: Evidence from bank-firm relationship data," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 254-268.
    9. Shamim, Saqib & Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & Zia, Najam Ul, 2020. "Big data analytics capability and decision making performance in emerging market firms: The role of contractual and relational governance mechanisms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Anna Jasińska-Biliczak, 2022. "Smart-City Citizen Engagement: The Answer to Energy Savings in an Economic Crisis?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Rocco Palumbo & Stefania Vezzosi & Paola Picciolli & Alessandro Landini & Carmela Annarumma & Rosalba Manna, 2018. "Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 371-391, September.
    16. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    17. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Julia Kurek & Justyna Martyniuk-Pęczek, 2021. "Exploring DAD and ADD Methods for Dealing with Urban Heat Island Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Timothy Waring & Taylor Lange & Sujan Chakraborty, 2022. "Institutional adaptation in the evolution of the ‘co-operative principles’," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 333-365, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3641-:d:775363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.