IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1606-d492272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Confusion and Green Consumption Intentions from the Perspective of Food-Related Lifestyles on Organic Infant Milk Formulas

Author

Listed:
  • Shao-Ping Yang

    (Graduate Institute of Bio-industry Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Chun Chang

    (Graduate Institute of Bio-industry Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Ta-Ching Liang

    (Department of Leisure & Recreation, National Formosa University, Huwei Township 632, Taiwan)

  • Rospita Odorlina P. Situmorang

    (Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

  • Minhas Hussain

    (Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

Abstract

A sustainable lifestyle and green consumption are becoming popular nowadays due to increased awareness of environmental issues and many incidents regarding food safety. This has triggered the rapid development of the marketing of green products and the promotion of many green brands which causes confusion among consumers. This paper’s purpose is to evaluate the relationship between this consumer confusion and different Food-Related Lifestyles (FRLs) tending towards green consumption, taking as a case study organic infant milk formula. This study was based on an online survey which was conducted with 381 Taiwanese parents and carried out from January to February 2019. Through cluster analysis, this study categorized the different FRLs into three groups, i.e., consumers unfamiliar with food product quality, consumers who value food quality, and consumers who value food practicality. This study found that there is no significant correlation between different levels of consumer confusion and different FRLs. Furthermore, different consumers’ FRLs have significant correlations with green consumption intention. This study also found a positive relationship between consumer confusion and green consumption intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Shao-Ping Yang & Shu-Chun Chang & Ta-Ching Liang & Rospita Odorlina P. Situmorang & Minhas Hussain, 2021. "Consumer Confusion and Green Consumption Intentions from the Perspective of Food-Related Lifestyles on Organic Infant Milk Formulas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1606-:d:492272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena Kowalska, 2020. "SME Managers’ Perceptions of Sustainable Marketing Mix in Different Socioeconomic Conditions—A Comparative Analysis of Sri Lanka and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Tim Cooper, 2005. "Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society”," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(1‐2), pages 51-67, January.
    3. Rospita Odorlina P. Situmorang & Ta-Ching Liang & Shu-Chun Chang, 2020. "The Difference of Knowledge and Behavior of College Students on Plastic Waste Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Simin, Mirela Tomaš & Trbić, Danica Glavaš & Petrović, Marcia & Komaromi, Bojana, 2019. "Prices Of Organic Products In The Republic Of Serbia," Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 1(2).
    5. Brunso, Karen & Scholderer, Joachim & Grunert, Klaus G., 2004. "Closing the gap between values and behavior--a means-end theory of lifestyle," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 665-670, June.
    6. Brunso, Karen & Grunert, Klaus G., 1998. "Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in Shopping for Food," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 145-150, June.
    7. Kurt Matzler & Daniel Stieger & Johann Füller, 2011. "Consumer Confusion in Internet-Based Mass Customization: Testing a Network of Antecedents and Consequences," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 231-247, June.
    8. Nitika Sharma & Raiswa Saha & V. Raja Sreedharan & Justin Paul, 2020. "Relating the role of green self‐concepts and identity on green purchasing behaviour: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3203-3219, December.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4687 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Joya A. Kemper & C. Michael Hall & Paul W. Ballantine, 2019. "Marketing and Sustainability: Business as Usual or Changing Worldviews?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Le Van Huy & Mai Thi Thao Chi & Antonio Lobo & Ninh Nguyen & Phan Hoang Long, 2019. "Effective Segmentation of Organic Food Consumers in Vietnam Using Food-Related Lifestyles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Jelena Vapa-Tankosić & Svetlana Ignjatijević & Jelena Kiurski & Jovana Milenković & Irena Milojević, 2020. "Analysis of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Organic and Local Honey in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Ta-Ching Liang & Rospita Odorlina P. Situmorang & Mei-Chi Liao & Shu-Chun Chang, 2020. "The Relationship of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness, Subjective Knowledge, and Purchase Intention on Carbon Label Products—A Case Study of Carbon-Labeled Packaged Tea Products in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Umar Nawaz Kayani & Anamul Haque & Umme Kulsum & Nishat Taslin Mohona & Fakhrul Hasan, 2023. "Modeling the Antecedents of Green Consumption Values to Promote the Green Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Lijun & House, Lisa A., 2020. "The moderator effect of food lifestyle on the relationship between aging and health," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304453, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Vojislava Bursić & Gorica Vuković & Magdalena Cara & Marija Kostić & Tijana Stojanović & Aleksandra Petrović & Nikola Puvača & Dušan Marinković & Bojan Konstantinović, 2021. "Plant Protection Products Residues Assessment in the Organic and Conventional Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Vuk Radojević & Mirela Tomaš Simin & Danica Glavaš Trbić & Dragan Milić, 2020. "A Profile of Organic Food Consumers—Serbia Case-Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Ramus, Kim Bjarne & Grunert, Klaus G., 2004. "Consumers’ Willingness To Buy Food Via The Internet: A Review Of The Litterature And A Model For Future Research," MAPP Working Papers 84, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    5. Thøgersen, John, 2017. "Housing-related lifestyle and energy saving: A multi-level approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 73-87.
    6. Jelena Vapa-Tankosić & Vera Miler-Jerković & Dejan Jeremić & Slobodan Stanojević & Gordana Radović, 2020. "Investment in Research and Development and New Technological Adoption for the Sustainable Beekeeping Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Lee, Eun Mi & Park, Seong-Yeon & Rapert, Molly I. & Newman, Christopher L., 2012. "Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1558-1564.
    8. MULLICK Naushadul Haque, 2013. "Enhancing The Image & Brand Equity Of A Shopping Mall," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 72-81, Decembre.
    9. Saddam A. Hazaea & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Khaled Zedan & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Jinyu Zhu & Hamzeh Al Amosh, 2022. "Green Purchasing: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    11. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Oliva Maria Dourado Martins & Dragan Ilic & Mădălina Belous & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Cezar Braicu & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2020. "Green and Sustainable Public Procurement—An Instrument for Nudging Consumer Behavior. A Case Study on Romanian Green Public Agriculture across Different Sectors of Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Nikola Puvača & Vincenzo Tufarelli, 2022. "Sustainable Organic Agriculture for Developing Agribusiness Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-3, August.
    13. Thi Tuyet Mai Nguyen & Thanh Hung Phan & Hoang Linh Nguyen & Thi Kim Thoa Dang & Ngoc Diep Nguyen, 2019. "Antecedents of Purchase Intention toward Organic Food in an Asian Emerging Market: A Study of Urban Vietnamese Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica & Heikkurinen, Pasi, 2022. "Sufficiency: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Minzhe Yi & Zihao Huang & Yuxiang Yu, 2022. "Creating a Sustainable E-Commerce Environment: The Impact of Product Configurator Interaction Design on Consumer Personalized Customization Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Tandon, Anushree & Dhir, Amandeep & Kaur, Puneet & Kushwah, Shiksha & Salo, Jari, 2020. "Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concerns and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    17. Magdalena Kowalska, 2022. "Conceptualization of Sustainable Marketing Tools among SME Managers in Selected Countries in Poland and Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Sezgin Çağlar Aksezer, 2023. "Sustainability via Extended Warranty Contracts: Design for a Consumer Electronics Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2021. "Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Michel Laroche, 2017. "When Materialists Intend to Resist Consumption: The Moderating Role of Self-Control and Long-Term Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 467-483, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1606-:d:492272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.