IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p11128-d652054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Opinion Leaders in the Sustainable Development of Corporate-Led Consumer Advice Networks: Evidence from a Chinese Travel Content Community

Author

Listed:
  • Lianren Wu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 200336, China
    Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Change Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 200336, China)

  • Jinjie Li

    (School of Tourism Management, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 201418, China)

  • Jiayin Qi

    (Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Change Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 200336, China
    Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Distributed Computing and Service, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100086, China)

  • Deli Kong

    (School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Xu Li

    (YunlianZhigao (Beijing) Information Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100086, China)

Abstract

Online community marketing and social media influencer marketing have aroused the interest of many researchers and practitioners around the world. Companies building online content communities to implement community marketing and influencer marketing has become a new corporate strategy, especially in the tourism and hotel industries in which experiential products are sold. However, based on the content community, maintaining the sustainable development of a consumer advice network composed of opinion leaders and consumers is a major challenge. This paper selects the travel content community of Qunar.com as the research object to study the role of opinion leaders in the sustainable development of corporate-led consumer advice networks (CANs). Empirical evidence based on network evolution data from 1356 “Hotel Sleep Testers” across 11 years shows that: (1) the creation and provision of information can obviously increase the probability of the relationship construction and increase the number of relationships, thus facilitating the formation of opinion leadership (OL); (2) active participation in interactions and withhigh-quality information brings greater effects; (3) the network structure variables, such as preferential attachment, structural equivalence, and similarity, can also better predict the probability of a potential relationship; and (4) reciprocity in consumer advice networks has no significant impact on the establishment of network relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Lianren Wu & Jinjie Li & Jiayin Qi & Deli Kong & Xu Li, 2021. "The Role of Opinion Leaders in the Sustainable Development of Corporate-Led Consumer Advice Networks: Evidence from a Chinese Travel Content Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11128-:d:652054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raghuram Iyengar & Christophe Van den Bulte & Thomas W. Valente, 2011. "Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 195-212, 03-04.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/14otokka698nb83lk2n7bhqbo2 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Stephen Leider & Markus M. Möbius & Tanya Rosenblat & Quoc-Anh Do, 2009. "Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(4), pages 1815-1851.
    4. Audrezet, Alice & de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Guidry Moulard, Julie, 2020. "Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 557-569.
    5. Francois Collet & Déborah Philippe, 2014. "From Hot Cakes to Cold Feet: A Contingent Perspective on the Relationship between Market Uncertainty and Status Homophily in the Formation of Alliances," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 406-432, May.
    6. Goeree, Jacob K. & Riedl, Arno & Ule, Aljaz, 2009. "In search of stars: Network formation among heterogeneous agents," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 445-466, November.
    7. Goyal, Sanjeev & Vega-Redondo, Fernando, 2005. "Network formation and social coordination," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 178-207, February.
    8. Yan, Qiang & Wu, Lianren & Zheng, Lan, 2013. "Social network based microblog user behavior analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(7), pages 1712-1723.
    9. Venkatesh Bala & Sanjeev Goyal, 2000. "A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(5), pages 1181-1230, September.
    10. Scott K. Shriver & Harikesh S. Nair & Reto Hofstetter, 2013. "Social Ties and User-Generated Content: Evidence from an Online Social Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1425-1443, June.
    11. Mahmoud Yasin & Lucia Porcu & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2019. "The Effect of Brand Experience on Customers’ Engagement Behavior within the Context of Online Brand Communities: The Impact on Intention to Forward Online Company-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Yingda Lu & Kinshuk Jerath & Param Vir Singh, 2013. "The Emergence of Opinion Leaders in a Networked Online Community: A Dyadic Model with Time Dynamics and a Heuristic for Fast Estimation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(8), pages 1783-1799, August.
    13. Umair Akram & Peng Hui & Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Chen Yan & Zubair Akram, 2018. "Factors Affecting Online Impulse Buying: Evidence from Chinese Social Commerce Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, January.
    14. Sokolova, Karina & Perez, Charles, 2021. "You follow fitness influencers on YouTube. But do you actually exercise? How parasocial relationships, and watching fitness influencers, relate to intentions to exercise," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    15. Ching-Wei Ho & Yu-Bing Wang, 2020. "Does Social Media Marketing and Brand Community Play the Role in Building a Sustainable Digital Business Strategy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Shareef, Mahmud Akhter & Mukerji, Bhasker & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Islam, Rubina, 2019. "Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 58-69.
    17. Gokhan Ertug & Martin Gargiulo & Charles Galunic & Tengjian Zou, 2018. "Homophily and Individual Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 912-930, October.
    18. Paulo B. Goes & Mingfeng Lin & Ching-man Au Yeung, 2014. "“Popularity Effect” in User-Generated Content: Evidence from Online Product Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 222-238, June.
    19. Carmen Berne-Manero & Mercedes Marzo-Navarro, 2020. "Exploring How Influencer and Relationship Marketing Serve Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Kim, Do Yuon & Kim, Hye-Young, 2021. "Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 223-232.
    21. Seetharaman, P B & Chintagunta, Pradeep K, 2003. "The Proportional Hazard Model for Purchase Timing: A Comparison of Alternative Specifications," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 21(3), pages 368-382, July.
    22. Jiemei Zhang & Qingbo Zhu & Yupei Wang, 2019. "Social Capital on Consumer Knowledge-Sharing in Virtual Brand Communities: The Mediating Effect of Pan-Family Consciousness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    23. Lin, Hsin-Chen & Bruning, Patrick F. & Swarna, Hepsi, 2018. "Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 431-442.
    24. Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen, 2021. "“Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 146-157.
    25. Tsang, Alex S.L. & Zhou, Nan, 2005. "Newsgroup participants as opinion leaders and seekers in online and offline communication environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1186-1193, September.
    26. Beatriz Feijoo & Charo Sádaba, 2021. "The Relationship of Chilean Minors with Brands and Influencers on Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    27. Blazevic, Vera & Wiertz, Caroline & Cotte, June & de Ruyter, Ko & Keeling, Debbie Isobel, 2014. "GOSIP in Cyberspace: Conceptualization and Scale Development for General Online Social Interaction Propensity," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 87-100.
    28. Ann E. Schlosser, 2005. "Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 260-265, September.
    29. Liang Xiao & Feipeng Guo & Fumao Yu & Shengnan Liu, 2019. "The Effects of Online Shopping Context Cues on Consumers’ Purchase Intention for Cross-Border E-Commerce Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    30. Jiaqi Liu & Zhenping Zhang & Jiayin Qi & Hong Wu & Manyi Chen, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Opinion Leaders’ Characteristics on Online Group Knowledge-Sharing Engagement from In-Group and Out-Group Perspectives: Evidence from a Chinese Online Knowledge-Sharing Com," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-28, August.
    31. Xicheng Yin & Hongwei Wang & Qiangwei Xia & Qican Gu, 2019. "How Social Interaction Affects Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: A Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    32. Leal, Gabriela Pasinato Alves & Hor-Meyll, Luis Fernando & de Paula Pessôa, Luís Alexandre Grubits, 2014. "Influence of virtual communities in purchasing decisions: The participants' perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 882-890.
    33. Liye Ma & Ramayya Krishnan & Alan L. Montgomery, 2015. "Latent Homophily or Social Influence? An Empirical Analysis of Purchase Within a Social Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 454-473, February.
    34. Wang, Xia & Yu, Chunling & Wei, Yujie, 2012. "Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 198-208.
    35. Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe) & Cuevas, Leslie M. & Chong, Sze Man & Lim, Heejin, 2020. "Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guiqiong Xu & Chen Dong & Lei Meng, 2022. "Research on the Collaborative Innovation Relationship of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Yangtze River Delta of China: A Complex Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Lichy, Jessica & Ng, Wilson, 2022. "Digital disruption in a state-controlled ecosystem: A sociomaterial perspective of public use of the internet under China's Social Credit System," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira & Maria José Sousa, 2022. "Sustainable Marketing and Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-3, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Carlos & Ibáñez-Sánchez, Sergio, 2020. "Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 510-519.
    2. Barta, Sergio & Belanche, Daniel & Fernández, Ana & Flavián, Marta, 2023. "Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Jinjie Li & Jiayin Qi & Lianren Wu & Nan Shi & Xu Li & Yuxin Zhang & Yinyin Zheng, 2021. "The Continued Use of Social Commerce Platforms and Psychological Anxiety—The Roles of Influencers, Informational Incentives and FoMO," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Jackson, Matthew O. & Zenou, Yves, 2015. "Games on Networks," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    5. Xiao Liu & Xiaoyong Zheng, 2024. "The persuasive power of social media influencers in brand credibility and purchase intention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Farivar, Samira & Wang, Fang, 2022. "Effective influencer marketing: A social identity perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Tianshu Sun & Sean J. Taylor, 2020. "Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 237-271, September.
    8. Rong, Rong & Houser, Daniel, 2015. "Growing stars: A laboratory analysis of network formation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 380-394.
    9. Farivar, Samira & Wang, Fang & Yuan, Yufei, 2021. "Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    11. Sheng, Jie, 2019. "Being Active in Online Communications: Firm Responsiveness and Customer Engagement Behaviour," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 40-51.
    12. Warinrampai Rungruangjit & Kitti Charoenpornpanichkul, 2022. "Building Stronger Brand Evangelism for Sustainable Marketing through Micro-Influencer-Generated Content on Instagram in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Sergio Barta & Raquel Gurrea & Carlos Flavián, 2023. "Telepresence in live-stream shopping: An experimental study comparing Instagram and the metaverse," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Cheung, Man Lai & Leung, Wilson K.S. & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Koay, Kian Yeik, 2022. "“I follow what you post!†: The role of social media influencers’ content characteristics in consumers' online brand-related activities (COBRAs)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    15. Ooi, Keng-Boon & Lee, Voon-Hsien & Hew, Jun-Jie & Leong, Lai-Ying & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Lim, Ai-Fen, 2023. "Social media influencers: An effective marketing approach?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. AlRabiah, Sara & Marder, Ben & Marshall, David & Angell, Rob, 2022. "Too much information: An examination of the effects of social self-disclosure embedded within influencer eWOM campaigns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 93-105.
    17. (Chloe) Ki, Chung-Wha & Park, Sangsoo & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2022. "Investigating the mechanism through which consumers are “inspired by” social media influencers and “inspired to” adopt influencers’ exemplars as social defaults," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 264-277.
    18. Robert Zniva & Wolfgang J. Weitzl & Christina Lindmoser, 2023. "Be constantly different! How to manage influencer authenticity," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1485-1514, September.
    19. Chen, Zhen-Yu & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Sun, Minghe, 2019. "Individual-level social influence identification in social media: A learning-simulation coordinated method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1005-1015.
    20. Sheng, Jie & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "A multidisciplinary perspective of big data in management research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 97-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11128-:d:652054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.