IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9757-d625744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supreme Audit Institutions and Sustainability of Public Finance. Links and Evidence along the Economic Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Ionel Bostan

    (Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Ștefan cel Mare University, Universitatii 13, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Mihaela Brindusa Tudose

    (Engineering and Management Department, Faculty of Industrial Design and Business Management, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University, Profesor Dimitrie Mangeron 29, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Raluca Irina Clipa

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Carol I 20A, 700505 Iasi, Romania)

  • Ionela Corina Chersan

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Carol I 20A, 700505 Iasi, Romania)

  • Flavian Clipa

    (Independent Researcher, 700505 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of concerns for diminishing the vulnerabilities of the economies of the Member States, the EU has adopted measures to strengthen budgetary discipline and control of the public deficit. In this context, the responsibility of government institutions has increased, not only in ensuring the sustainability of public finances but also in direct or indirect cooperation for good economic governance. From this perspective, this study aims to assess the impact of macroeconomic variables and those associated with supreme audit institutions on the sustainability of public finances measured by the size and dynamics of government deficit and gross public debt. Additionally, the impact of the same variables on governmental effectiveness and control of corruption has also been assessed. The data collected from secondary sources and panel data models were used to conduct an empirical study of the EU Member States which covered the 2002–2019 period and the sub-periods, divided as follows: pre-crisis, crisis, and post-crisis. The results of the study show that supreme audit institutions, through their organizational structure, the nature of their activities, and professionalism, may contribute to the reduction of public deficit and gross public debt and, implicitly, to higher efficiency and control of corruption. The results of analyses for the sub-periods show that ISAs played a more important role in reducing government deficit during crisis and post-crisis periods. By confirming or rejecting the results of the few studies that have been conducted so far, this study provides additional evidence that fills the gaps in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionel Bostan & Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Raluca Irina Clipa & Ionela Corina Chersan & Flavian Clipa, 2021. "Supreme Audit Institutions and Sustainability of Public Finance. Links and Evidence along the Economic Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9757-:d:625744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9757/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9757/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Marie Baland & François Bourguignon & Jean-Phlippe Platteau & Thierry Verdier, 2020. "The Handbook of Economic Development and Institutions," Post-Print halshs-02489840, HAL.
    2. Blume, Lorenz & Voigt, Stefan, 2011. "Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-229, June.
    3. Gyula Pulay & József Simon, 2020. "Measuring the Macroeconomic Performance of Public Finance Management," Public Finance Quarterly, State Audit Office of Hungary, vol. 65(5), pages 23-43.
    4. Isaksson, Ann-Sofie & Bigsten, Arne, 2012. "Institution Building with Limited Resources: Establishing a Supreme Audit Institution in Rwanda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1870-1881.
    5. Lorenz Blume & Stefan Voigt, 2007. "Supreme Audit Institutions: Supremely Superfluous? A Cross Country Assessment," ICER Working Papers 03-2007, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    6. András Bethlendi & Csaba Lentner, 2018. "Subnational Fiscal Consolidation: The Hungarian Path from Crisis to Fiscal Sustainability in Light of International Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Isabel Novo-Corti & Xose Picatoste, 2019. "Sustainable Public Finance and Debt Management," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, in: Magdalena Ziolo & Bruno S. Sergi (ed.), Financing Sustainable Development, chapter 0, pages 227-247, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Valentin-Marian Antohi & Monica Laura Zlati & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Mihaela Neculita & Raluca Rusu & Aurelian Constantin, 2020. "Attracting European Funds in the Romanian Economy and Leverage Points for Securing their Sustainable Management: A Critical Auditing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    9. David Hay & Carolyn J. Cordery, 2021. "Evidence about the value of financial statement audit in the public sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 304-314, May.
    10. Andreea-Oana Iacobuță & Mihaela Ifrim, 2020. "Welfare Mentality as a Challenge to European Sustainable Development. What Role for Youth Inclusion and Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.
    11. Nagy, Sándor, 2012. "The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fight against the consequences of financial and economic crisis: A theoretical approach," MPRA Paper 40356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Louise Bringselius, 2018. "Efficiency, economy and effectiveness—but what about ethics? Supreme audit institutions at a critical juncture," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 105-110, February.
    13. Nicolas Pinsard & Yamina Tadjeddine, 2021. "The marketization of the French public finance before capitalism : The Paulette edict of 1604," Post-Print hal-03233516, HAL.
    14. Schelker, Mark & Eichenberger, Reiner, 2010. "Auditors and fiscal policy: Empirical evidence on a little big institution," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 357-380, December.
    15. Ivana Vukčević & Radislav Jovović, 2020. "The Quality of Public Finance in the Countries of South-East Europe," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 9(1), pages 169-184.
    16. Rick Stapenhurst & Jack Titsworth, 2001. "Features and Functions of Supreme Audit Institutions," World Bank Publications - Reports 11363, The World Bank Group.
    17. Marta Rodriguez-Vives, 2019. "The quality of public finances: where do we stand?," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 97-105.
    18. Benjamin A. Olken, 2007. "Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(2), pages 200-249.
    19. Elisa Bonollo, 2019. "Measuring supreme audit institutions’ outcomes: current literature and future insights," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 468-477, October.
    20. Mihaela Onofrei & Anca Gavriluţă (Vatamanu) & Ionel Bostan & Florin Oprea & Gigel Paraschiv & Cristina Mihaela Lazăr, 2020. "The Implication of Fiscal Principles and Rules on Promoting Sustainable Public Finances in the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    21. Reiner Eichenberger & Mark Schelker, 2007. "Independent and competing agencies: An effective way to control government," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 79-98, January.
    22. Guter-Sandu, Andrei & Murau, Steffen, 2022. "The Eurozone’s evolving fiscal ecosystem: mitigating fiscal discipline by governing through off-balance-sheet fiscal agencies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109790, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    23. Benno Torgler, 2005. "A Knight without a Sword?. The Effects of Audit Courts on Tax Morale," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 161(4), pages 735-760, December.
    24. Hickey, Rónán & Lozej, Matija & Smyth, Diarmaid, 2020. "Financing government investment and its implications for public capital: A small open economy perspective," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 620-641.
    25. Bergman, U. Michael & Hutchison, Michael M. & Jensen, Svend E. Hougaard, 2016. "Promoting sustainable public finances in the European Union: The role of fiscal rules and government efficiency," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-19.
    26. Dana Simona Gherai & Ioan Gheorghe Tara & Diana Elisabeta Matica, 2016. "The Supreme Audit Institution Can Control The Corruption Or Not?," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 465-476, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ionel Bostan, 2021. "Special Issue “Audit and Financial Control Tools Aimed at Ensuring the Sustainable Performance of Organizations”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-4, September.
    2. Nicoleta Asalos & Ionel Bostan, 2023. "Orientation of Public Audit Missions to the IT Activity Carried Out within the State Authorities/Entities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 876-885, August.
    3. Mir Sadaat Baloch & Nadir Khan, 2022. "Improving the Public Sector Development Programme Allocations in the Clientelistic Environment of Balochistan: A Political Economy Analysis (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 213-230.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huseyin Cicek & Suleyman Dikmen, 2021. "External Audit And Fiscal Transparency: An Empirical Analysis," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 7-26.
    2. Lino, André Feliciano & Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha de & Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de & Steccolini, Ileana, 2022. "Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Schelker, Mark, 2012. "Auditor expertise: Evidence from the public sector," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 432-435.
    4. Mark Schelker & Reiner Eichenberger, 2008. "Rethinking public auditing institutions: Empirical evidence from Swiss municipalities," Working Papers 2008/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    5. Mihaela Tofan & Mihaela Onofrei & Anca-Florentina Vatamanu, 2020. "Fiscal Responsibility Legal Framework—New Paradigm for Fiscal Discipline in the EU," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Schelker, Mark & Eichenberger, Reiner, 2010. "Auditors and fiscal policy: Empirical evidence on a little big institution," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 357-380, December.
    7. Blume, Lorenz & Voigt, Stefan, 2011. "Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-229, June.
    8. Ryota Nakatani, 2021. "Fiscal Rules for Natural Disaster- and Climate Change-Prone Small States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Jan Buček, 2022. "Comparison of Selected Elements and Processes within the Activity of European SAIs," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 45-66.
    10. López-Herrera, Carmen & Cordero, José M. & Pedraja-Chaparro, Francisco & Polo, Cristina, 2023. "Fiscal rules and their influence on public sector efficiency," MPRA Paper 119018, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Sanda Mihai-Razvan & Militaru Elian-Gabriel, 2023. "European Supreme Audit Institutions: The Constitutional And Legal Coordinates Of Diagonal Public Accountability," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 105-119, October.
    12. Benno Torgler & Christoph A. Schaltegger, 2005. "The Determinants of Political Discussion: How Important are Audit Courts and Local Autonomy?," CREMA Working Paper Series 2005-28, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    13. Mark Schelker, 2009. "Auditor Terms and Term Limits in the Public Sector: Evidence from the US States," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-19, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    14. Isaksson, Ann-Sofie & Bigsten, Arne, 2012. "Institution Building with Limited Resources: Establishing a Supreme Audit Institution in Rwanda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1870-1881.
    15. Cristina-Petrina Drăgușin (Trincu-Drăgușin) & Ileana Cosmina Pitulice & Aurelia Ștefănescu, 2021. "Harmonisation and Emergence Concerning the Performance Audit of the EU Member States’ Public Sector. Romania’s Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Rajat Deb, 2018. "Financial Audit or Forensic Audit? Government Sector Panorama," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(2), pages 135-158, December.
    17. Lenka Hudáková Stašová, 2019. "The Scope of Control of the Supreme Audit Office in the Slovak Republic and in the other Visegrad Four Countries," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 41(2), pages 245-262, June.
    18. Mark Schelker, 2012. "The influence of auditor term length and term limits on US state general obligation bond ratings," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 27-49, January.
    19. Julia del Amo Valor & Marcos Martín Mateos & Diego Martínez López & Javier J. Pérez, 2023. "Is the European economic governance framework too “complex”? A critical discussion," Working Papers 2023-06, FEDEA.
    20. Reiner Eichenberger & David Stadelmann, 2009. "Consequences of Debt Capitalization: Property Ownership and Debt/Tax Choice," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-08, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9757-:d:625744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.