IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3673-d524301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harmonisation and Emergence Concerning the Performance Audit of the EU Member States’ Public Sector. Romania’s Case

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina-Petrina Drăgușin (Trincu-Drăgușin)

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romana Square 6, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ileana Cosmina Pitulice

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romana Square 6, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Aurelia Ștefănescu

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romana Square 6, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The complexity of the public sector generated by the mobilisation and use of significant financial resources, national cultural factors, the heterogeneity of the provision of public services, the numerous interested parties, the increasing demand for the quality of public services, the information asymmetry, require an actor to provide credible assurance regarding the proper management of public financial resources. In this context, performance audits are the link between public sector entities and stakeholders. The research has two components: the first component analyzes the degree of harmonization of the regulations specific to the performance audit in Romania with the International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI); the second component analyses the degree of transparency of performance audit information by the SAIs of the EU Member States, through their official websites. In this regard, we have resorted to an in-depth longitudinal study, content analysis and disclosure index. The research results highlighted that the Romanian SAI has adopted in its normative framework the foremost ISSAI provisions on performance audit and the harmonization degree has systematically improved correlative with the regulatory revisions. The degree of disclosure for performance audit-specific information by the EU member state SAIs is high.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina-Petrina Drăgușin (Trincu-Drăgușin) & Ileana Cosmina Pitulice & Aurelia Ștefănescu, 2021. "Harmonisation and Emergence Concerning the Performance Audit of the EU Member States’ Public Sector. Romania’s Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3673-:d:524301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng, Songlan & van der Laan Smith, Joyce, 2010. "Chinese GAAP and IFRS: An analysis of the convergence process," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 16-34.
    2. Maria Madalina Buculescu (Costica) & Bogdan Nicolae Velicescu, 2014. "An Analysis of the Convergence Level of Tangible Assets (PPE) According to Romanian National Accounting Regulation and IFRS for Smes," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 774-799, December.
    3. Lorenz Blume & Stefan Voigt, 2007. "Supreme Audit Institutions: Supremely Superfluous? A Cross Country Assessment," ICER Working Papers 03-2007, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    4. Reichborn-Kjennerud, Kristin & González-Díaz, Belén & Bracci, Enrico & Carrington, Thomas & Hathaway, James & Jeppesen, Kim Klarskov & Steccolini, Ileana, 2019. "Sais work against corruption in Scandinavian, South-European and African countries: An institutional analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    5. Ella Desmedt & Danielle Morin & Valérie Pattyn & Marleen Brans, 2017. "Impact of performance audit on the Administration: a Belgian study (2005-2010)," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 251-275, March.
    6. Rodríguez Bolívar, Manuel Pedro & Navarro Galera, Andrés & Alcaide Muñoz, Laura, 2015. "Governance, transparency and accountability: An international comparison," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 136-174.
    7. Cristina-Petrina TRINCU-DRAGUSIN & Aurelia STEFANESCU, 2020. "The External Public Audit in the Member States of the European Union: Between Standard Typology and Diversity," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 18(159), pages 555-555.
    8. Jeppesen, Kim K., 2019. "The role of auditing in the fight against corruption," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    9. Nadia ALBU & Ioana PALARIE, 2016. "Convergence of Romanian accounting regulations with IFRS. A longitudinal analysis," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(138), pages 634-634, June.
    10. Elisa Bonollo, 2019. "Measuring supreme audit institutions’ outcomes: current literature and future insights," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 468-477, October.
    11. Alexandra Fontes & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues & Russell Craig, 2005. "Measuring convergence of National Accounting Standards with International Financial Reporting Standards," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 415-436, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihai-Răzvan Sanda & Cristina-Petrina Trincu-Dragusin, 2021. "Supreme Audit Institutions and the Strive Towards an Open Data Culture," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 1120-1130, December.
    2. Adriana Alina Spatariu, 2021. "Assessment of Adequate Use of Public Funds and Ensuring Institutional Performance," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 512-519, December.
    3. Teodora Nicoleta LAZAR (PLESA) & Constanta POPESCU, 2021. "The Role And Effectiveness Of The Supreme Audit Institutions In The Context Of The Global Crisis Generated By Covid 19," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 11-20, November.
    4. Sanda Mihai-Razvan & Militaru Elian-Gabriel, 2023. "European Supreme Audit Institutions: The Constitutional And Legal Coordinates Of Diagonal Public Accountability," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 105-119, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia Catalina CIOCAN, 2019. "Prudence vs. Credibility. A Formal Comparative Analysis between Romanian Accounting Regulations and IFRS," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(153), pages 114-114.
    2. Daniela PORDEA & Alin-Constantin DUMITRESCU, 2021. "Convergence to IFRS in Romania – Score per Minute," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 19(162), pages 373-373, May.
    3. Lino, André Feliciano & Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha de & Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de & Steccolini, Ileana, 2022. "Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Ionel Bostan & Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Raluca Irina Clipa & Ionela Corina Chersan & Flavian Clipa, 2021. "Supreme Audit Institutions and Sustainability of Public Finance. Links and Evidence along the Economic Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Nadia ALBU & Ioana PALARIE, 2016. "Convergence of Romanian accounting regulations with IFRS. A longitudinal analysis," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(138), pages 634-634, June.
    6. Stuart Kells, 2011. "The Seven Deadly Sins of Performance Auditing: Implications for Monitoring Public Audit Institutions," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(4), pages 383-396, December.
    7. Hlaciuc Elena & Mihalciuc Camelia Catalina & Cibotariu Irina Stefana & Apetri Anisoara Niculina, 2009. "Some Issues About The Transition From U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Gaap) To International Financial Reporting Standards (Ifrs)," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-28.
    8. Valentin-Marian Antohi & Monica Laura Zlati & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Mihaela Neculita & Raluca Rusu & Aurelian Constantin, 2020. "Attracting European Funds in the Romanian Economy and Leverage Points for Securing their Sustainable Management: A Critical Auditing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Mustata, Razvan V. & Matis, Dumitru, 2007. "Measurement Of Need For Harmonization Between National Accounting Standards And International Financial Reporting Standards," MPRA Paper 6183, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Liu, Shuyan & Jia, Ruo & Zhao, Yulong & Sun, Qixiang, 2019. "Global consistent or market-oriented? A quantitative assessment of RBC standards, solvency II, and C-ROSS," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Lennox, Clive & Wang, Zi-Tian & Wu, Xi, 2018. "Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions: Evidence from China," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 21-40.
    12. Pillai, Unni & McLaughlin, Jamison, 2013. "A model of competition in the solar panel industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 32-39.
    13. Tsai, Yu Ling & Huang, Hua-Wei, 2021. "Does IFRS reduce IPO underpricing? evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    14. Baltariu Carmen-Alexandra & Cirstea Andreea, 2012. "European Harmonization Of Consolidated Financial Statements Regulations?," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 860-865, July.
    15. Andrei Markevich, 2011. "How Much Control is Enough? Monitoring and Enforcement under Stalin," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(8), pages 1449-1468.
    16. Jan Buček, 2022. "Comparison of Selected Elements and Processes within the Activity of European SAIs," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 45-66.
    17. Blane D. Lewis & Adrianus Hendrawan, 2020. "The impact of public sector accounting reform on corruption: Causal evidence from subnational Indonesia," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(5), pages 245-254, December.
    18. Capasso, Salvatore & Cicatiello, Lorenzo & De Simone, Elina & Gaeta, Giuseppe Lucio & Mourão, Paulo Reis, 2021. "Fiscal transparency and tax ethics: does better information lead to greater compliance?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 1031-1050.
    19. Sanda Mihai-Razvan & Militaru Elian-Gabriel, 2023. "European Supreme Audit Institutions: The Constitutional And Legal Coordinates Of Diagonal Public Accountability," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 105-119, October.
    20. Carmen-Alexandra Baltariu & Andreea Cîrstea, 2012. "Harmonization Of Goodwill Reporting Practice In The Consolidated Financial Statements Of Romanian Groups," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3673-:d:524301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.