IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aka/soceco/v41y2019i2p245-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Scope of Control of the Supreme Audit Office in the Slovak Republic and in the other Visegrad Four Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Lenka Hudáková Stašová

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

In this contribution, we evaluate the performance of the Supreme Audit Office’s (SAO) audit activity in the Visegrad Four (V4) countries. We focus on the analysis of the control activities of the SAO of the Slovak Republic and we compare the results with other countries. We focused on the SAO’s function control, according to the number of controls undertaken over the period 2014– 2016, and evaluated an auditors’s burden (the number of controls performed by one inspector). We state the positives, but also the risks of expanding the area of control over the self-government bodies, and we put forward proposals to reduce these risks. Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland have the same or similar historical trajectories, cultural and intellectual values and they share common roots of religious traditions. Therefore we assume that they may display certain key similarities in institutional development, including in the area of public finance control. We review how these countries have worked in the area today, with a focus on the period between 2014 and 2016.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenka Hudáková Stašová, 2019. "The Scope of Control of the Supreme Audit Office in the Slovak Republic and in the other Visegrad Four Countries," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 41(2), pages 245-262, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:41:y:2019:i:2:p:245-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.akademiai.com/doi/pdf/10.1556/204.2019.006
    Download Restriction: subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nagy, Sándor, 2012. "The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fight against the consequences of financial and economic crisis: A theoretical approach," MPRA Paper 40356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. László Jankovics, 2016. "Local Government Finances in Hungary: From the Culprit of Fiscal Slippages to a Source of Stability?," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 38(4), pages 455-478, December.
    3. Pat Barrett, 2012. "Performance auditing—addressing real or perceived expectation gaps in the public sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 129-136, March.
    4. Martina KLIEROVA & Jan KUTIK, 2017. "One Stop Government – Strategy of Public Services for Citizens and Businesses in Slovakia," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2017(28), pages 66-80, June.
    5. Nicola Mario Iacovino & Sara Barsanti & Lino Cinquini, 2017. "Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: the Case of the Tuscany Region," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 61-82, March.
    6. Nives Botica Redmayne & Michael E. Bradbury & Steven F. Cahan, 2010. "The effect of political visibility on audit effort and audit pricing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(4), pages 921-939, December.
    7. Rick Stapenhurst & Jack Titsworth, 2001. "Features and Functions of Supreme Audit Institutions," World Bank Publications - Reports 11363, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ionel Bostan & Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Raluca Irina Clipa & Ionela Corina Chersan & Flavian Clipa, 2021. "Supreme Audit Institutions and Sustainability of Public Finance. Links and Evidence along the Economic Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Christodoulos K. Akrivos, 2019. "Managers’ Perception on Public Organizations’ Performance and New Public Management during Economic Crises," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 57-69.
    3. Panagiotis Dimitropoulos, 2016. "Audit Selection in the European Football Industry under Union of European Football Associations Financial Fair Play," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(3), pages 901-906.
    4. Jan Buček, 2022. "Comparison of Selected Elements and Processes within the Activity of European SAIs," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 45-66.
    5. Hassan Danaeefard & Atiye Sedaghat & Seyed Hosein Kazemi & Ahmadali Khaef Elahi, 2022. "Investment Areas to Enhance Public Employee Resilience during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence from Iran," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 837-855, September.
    6. Rondan-Cataluña, F. Javier & Peral-Peral, Begoña & Ramírez-Correa, Patricio E., 2023. "Measuring public opinion of education apps," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Huseyin Cicek & Suleyman Dikmen, 2021. "External Audit And Fiscal Transparency: An Empirical Analysis," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 7-26.
    8. Edgar Quispe-Mamani & Pascual Ayamamani-Collanqui, 2023. "Unitarian Illusion in Peru: Recentralization and Intergovernmental Conflicts from the Perspective of Local Governments," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 985-1000, September.
    9. Tumanyan Garnik (Туманян Г.В.), 2021. "Attitude Of Citizens To Participatory Practices Implemented At The Level Of A Constituent Entity Of The Russian Federation: Problems And Solutions [Отношение Граждан К Партисипативным Практикам, Ре," State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 284-292.
    10. Aleksander Aristovnik & Eva Murko & Dejan Ravšelj, 2022. "From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Lino, André Feliciano & Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha de & Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de & Steccolini, Ileana, 2022. "Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Monia Castellini & Caterina Ferrario & Vincenzo Riso, 2021. "From New Public Management to Public Risk Management: An overview of Italian municipalities," Working Papers 20210310, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    13. Suleimenova Gulimzhan & Kadyrova Margarita & Kapoguzov Evgeny & Kabizhan Nurbek, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of the Government Agencies of Kazakhstan," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 171-198, December.
    14. Yang Xu & Elizabeth Carson & Neil Fargher & Liwei Jiang, 2013. "Responses by Australian auditors to the global financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(1), pages 301-338, March.
    15. Sun, Xuan Sean & Habib, Ahsan & Bhuiyan, Md. Borhan Uddin, 2020. "Workforce environment and audit fees: International evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    16. George Silviu CORDOŞ & Melinda Timea FÜLÖP, 2020. "Debates In The Literature Regarding Audit Reporting," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(22), pages 1-4.
    17. Abdullah Zafar Sheikh & John Chandler & Basharat Hussain & Stephen Timmons, 2022. "Performance measurement and management in the British higher education sector," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4809-4824, December.
    18. Vasvári, Tamás, 2019. "Decentralizáció és költségvetési korlát. Miért fontos, hogy a haszonélvezők viseljék a költségeket? [Decentralization and budget constraints. Why should costs be borne by those benefiting from them," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 932-959.
    19. Isaksson, Ann-Sofie & Bigsten, Arne, 2012. "Institution Building with Limited Resources: Establishing a Supreme Audit Institution in Rwanda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1870-1881.
    20. Linus Axén & Torbjörn Tagesson & Denis Shcherbinin & Azra Custovic & Anna Ojdanic, 2019. "Does municipal ownership affect audit fees?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 693-713, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    control systems in public administration; scope of control; Supreme Audit Office; control in the state administration; control in self-government;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H73 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:41:y:2019:i:2:p:245-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kriston, Orsolya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://akademiai.hu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.