IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5923-d561335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Attitude towards the Sustainable Use of Mobile Technologies in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana Mâță

    (Teacher Training Department, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacau, 600115 Bacau, Romania)

  • Otilia Clipa

    (Educational Sciences Department, Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720029 Suceava, Romania)

  • Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu

    (Teacher Training Department, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacau, 600115 Bacau, Romania)

  • Viorel Robu

    (Department of Romanian Language and Literature and Communication Sciences, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacau, 600115 Bacau, Romania)

  • Tatiana Dobrescu

    (Department of Physical Education and Sports Performance, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacau, 600115 Bacau, Romania)

  • Carlos Hervás-Gómez

    (Department of Teaching and Educational Organization, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain)

  • Ionuț Viorel Stoica

    (Department of Biology, Ecology and Environmental Protection, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacau, 600115 Bacau, Romania)

Abstract

Our study aims to identify students’ attitudes towards the use of mobile technologies (MT) during learning activities in higher education. Data were collected using the Mobile Technologies Questionnaire/MTQ, a ten-item brief questionnaire that was designed to determine attitudes towards the use of mobile technologies in the learning process among university students and academic staff. The MTQ was completed by 575 students from a state university in the northeastern region of Romania. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed two latent factors: MT facilities for study resources and communication and MT facilities for learning. Along with general analysis of the statistical indicators regarding the attitude towards the use of MT, the relationships between the use of MT and five socio-demographic variables (gender, age, place of residence, year of study, academic status and study program) were analyzed. Comparative data showed some statistically significant differences but with small or modest effect sizes, depending on age, year of study, place of residence, academic status and the study program in which the students were enrolled. This study provides additional support for the construct validity of a brief tool that was designed to measure students’ attitudes towards the use of MT during learning activities carried out in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana Mâță & Otilia Clipa & Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu & Viorel Robu & Tatiana Dobrescu & Carlos Hervás-Gómez & Ionuț Viorel Stoica, 2021. "Students’ Attitude towards the Sustainable Use of Mobile Technologies in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5923-:d:561335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liliana Mâță & Otilia Clipa & Katerina Tzafilkou, 2020. "The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure University Teachers’ Attitude towards Ethical Use of Information Technology for a Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Inmaculada García-Martínez & José María Fernández-Batanero & David Cobos Sanchiz & Antonio Luque de la Rosa, 2019. "Using Mobile Devices for Improving Learning Outcomes and Teachers’ Professionalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Emilio Abad-Segura & Eloy López-Meneses & José Gómez-Galán, 2020. "Managing ICT for Sustainable Education: Research Analysis in the Context of Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Henry Kaiser, 1974. "An index of factorial simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 31-36, March.
    5. Reyer van der Vlies, 2020. "Digital strategies in education across OECD countries: Exploring education policies on digital technologies," OECD Education Working Papers 226, OECD Publishing.
    6. Hamed Taherdoost, 2016. "Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research," Post-Print hal-02546796, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmen Jiménez-Bucarey & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Sheyla Müller-Pérez & Luis Aguilar-Gallardo & Miguel Mora-Moscoso & Elena Cachicatari Vargas, 2021. "Student’s Satisfaction of the Quality of Online Learning in Higher Education: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lillemo, Shuling Chen, 2014. "Measuring the effect of procrastination and environmental awareness on households' energy-saving behaviours: An empirical approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 249-256.
    2. Simplice A. Asongu, 2014. "Knowledge Economy and Financial Sector Competition in African Countries," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 26(2), pages 333-346, June.
    3. Yoshihiro Zenno & Kentaka Aruga, 2022. "Institutional Investors’ Willingness to Pay for Green Bonds: A Case for Shanghai," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Rodríguez-Fuentes, Carlos Javier & Hernández-López, Montserrat, 1997. "Análisis de diferencias estructurales interregionales determinantes en el impacto de la política monetaria," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 7, pages 141-157, Junio.
    5. Asongu, Simplice & Tchamyou, Vanessa & Asongu, Ndemaze & Tchamyou, Nina, 2018. "The Comparative African Economics of Governance in Fighting Terrorism," MPRA Paper 92346, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Simplice A Asongu, 2013. "Modeling the future of knowledge economy: evidence from SSA and MENA countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(1), pages 612-624.
    7. Xiangfei Yuan & Haijing Hao & Chenghua Guan & Alex Pentland, 2022. "Which factors affect the performance of technology business incubators in China? An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Orkhan Sariyev & Tim K. Loos & Manfred Zeller & Tulsi Gurung, 2020. "Women in household decision-making and implications for dietary quality in Bhutan," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Romero, Pascual & Botía, Pablo & del Amor, Francisco M. & Gil-Muñoz, Rocío & Flores, Pilar & Navarro, Josefa María, 2019. "Interactive effects of the rootstock and the deficit irrigation technique on wine composition, nutraceutical potential, aromatic profile, and sensory attributes under semiarid and water limiting condi," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Mohd Hizam Hanafiah, & Sheikh Usman Yousaf, & Bushra Usman,, 2017. "The influence of psychological capital on the growth intentions of entrepreneurs: A study on Malaysian SME entrepreneurs," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(5), pages 556-569, December.
    11. Omar Hegazi & Samer Alalalmeh & Ahmad Alfaresi & Soheil Dashtinezhad & Ahmed Bahada & Moyad Shahwan & Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun & Tesleem K. Babalola & Haya Yasin, 2022. "Development, Validation, and Utilization of a Social Media Use and Mental Health Questionnaire among Middle Eastern and Western Adults: A Pilot Study from the UAE," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Mudaca, Joao Daniel & Tsuchiya, Toshiyuki & Yamada, Masaaki & Onwona-Agyeman, Siaw, 2015. "Household participation in Payments for Ecosystem Services: A case study from Mozambique," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 21-27.
    13. Paul MUKUCHA & Divaries Cosmas JARAVAZA & Forbes MAKUDZA, 2022. "Towards Gender-Based Market Segmentation: The Differential Influence of Gender on Dining Experiences in the University Cafeteria Industry," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 182-200, June.
    14. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    15. Wei Tong Chen & Hew Cameron Merrett & Ying-Hua Huang & Theresia Avila Bria & Ying-Hsiu Lin, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Safety Climate and Worker Safety Behavior on Building Construction Sites in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Akhter Ali & N. Ravichandran & D.K. Batra, 2013. "Children’s Choice of Influence Strategies in Family Purchase Decisions and the Impact of Demographics," Vision, , vol. 17(1), pages 27-40, March.
    17. Yoo, Sun-Young & Vonk, M. Elizabeth, 2012. "The development and initial validation of the Immigrant Parental Stress Inventory (IPSI) in a sample of Korean immigrant parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 989-998.
    18. Jayaram, Jayanth & Tan, Keah-Choon, 2010. "Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 262-271, June.
    19. Eduardo Sandoval-Obando & Nicolás Pareja Arellano & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Hernán Riquelme-Brevis & Claudio Hernández-Mosqueira & Johan Rivas-Valenzuela, 2022. "Understanding the Relational Dynamics of Chilean Rural Teachers: Contributions from a Narrative-Generative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. M. Todd Royle & Gavin Fox & Wayne A. Hochwarter, 2009. "The Relationships Between Select Situational And Dispositional Constructs And Informal Accountability For Others," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 2(1), pages 113-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5923-:d:561335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.