IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p2078-d220755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Transparency in Humanitarian Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Khan

    (Department of International Economics & Business, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Korea)

  • Hee Yong Lee

    (Department of International Economics & Business, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Korea)

  • Jung Han Bae

    (Department of International Economics & Business, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Korea)

Abstract

Human suffering has increased in recent years owing to increased intensity ad frequency of disasters. These are expected to further increase in the coming years due to climate change. Although natural disaster risks to humans cannot be completely eliminated, they can be minimized through efficient and effective humanitarian logistics (HL). Considering the importance of HL in reducing the impacts of disasters through fair distribution, this study aims to address the following question: “How can the performance, efficiency and effectiveness of HL be improved through transparency?” The primary data were collected through an online structured questionnaire from the employees participating in relief operations in Pakistan. This specific research model is reflective. Therefore, a covariance-based structure equation model (CB-SEM) based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with SmartPLS software was used. The study tested the items’ reliability, discriminate validity, goodness of fit, and psychometrical soundness of the hypothesized model. The study results indicate that the relationship between predictor variables (disclosure, clarity, accuracy, corporate governance, decision making and accountability) and the response variable (effective HL) is mediated by public trust. Furthermore, the study suggests that public trust plays an imperative role in enhancing the performance, efficiency and effectiveness of HL. In addition, first, the study findings are expected to be beneficial for all stakeholders of disaster risk management, especially for governments, donors and humanitarian organizations (HOs), because they are persistently seeking strategies to assist victims. Second, most importantly, this study raises awareness of the need to carefully evaluate decisions related to the fair distribution of relief items. Third, the structure of this article reveals research gaps and promising areas for further research. This article provides a deeper understanding of transparency in HL using empirical data, which has not been explored before.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Khan & Hee Yong Lee & Jung Han Bae, 2019. "The Role of Transparency in Humanitarian Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2078-:d:220755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2078/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2078/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohd Hassan Che Haat & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Sakthi Mahenthiran, 2008. "Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(8), pages 744-778, September.
    2. Yolanda Ramírez & Ángel Tejada, 2018. "Corporate governance of universities: improving transparency and accountability," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 29-39, February.
    3. Md Morshed Alom, 2018. "Proactive transparency and outward accountability of frontline public bureaucracies," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(4), pages 611-628, April.
    4. Kosec, Katrina & Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung, 2017. "Aspirations and the Role of Social Protection: Evidence from a Natural Disaster in Rural Pakistan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 49-66.
    5. Nooteboom, B. & Berger, H. & Noorderhaven, N.G., 1997. "Effects of trust and governance on relational risk," Other publications TiSEM 8e83932e-064c-40e8-afe7-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Capaldo, Antonio & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "How does trust affect performance in the supply chain? The moderating role of interdependence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 36-49.
    7. F. Maon & A. Lindgreen & J. Vanhamme, 2009. "Developing supply chains in disaster relief operations through cross-sector socially oriented collaborations : a theoretical model," Post-Print hal-00575871, HAL.
    8. Allen, Mathew R. & George, Bradley A. & Davis, James H., 2018. "A model for the role of trust in firm level performance: The case of family businesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 34-45.
    9. Everett, Jeff & Friesen, Constance, 2010. "Humanitarian accountability and performance in the Théâtre de l’Absurde," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 468-485.
    10. Teerooven Soobaroyen & Jyoti Devi Mahadeo, 2012. "Do corporate governance codes improve board accountability?," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 337-362, November.
    11. Galindo, Gina & Batta, Rajan, 2013. "Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 201-211.
    12. Panayides, Photis M. & Venus Lun, Y.H., 2009. "The impact of trust on innovativeness and supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 35-46, November.
    13. Akkermans, Henk & Bogerd, Paul & van Doremalen, Jan, 2004. "Travail, transparency and trust: A case study of computer-supported collaborative supply chain planning in high-tech electronics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 445-456, March.
    14. Enrico Bracci, 2014. "Accountability and governance in social care: the impact of personalisation," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 111-128, June.
    15. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2003. "The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 57-68, February.
    16. Cullen, John B. & Johnson, Jean L. & Sakano, Tomoaki, 2000. "Success through commitment and trust: the soft side of strategic alliance management," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 223-240.
    17. Constantine S Katsikeas & Dionysis Skarmeas & Daniel C Bello, 2009. "Developing successful trust-based international exchange relationships," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(1), pages 132-155, January.
    18. Unknown, 2005. "Forward," 2005 Conference: Slovenia in the EU - Challenges for Agriculture, Food Science and Rural Affairs, November 10-11, 2005, Moravske Toplice, Slovenia 183804, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    19. Sako, Mari & Helper, Susan, 1998. "Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 387-417, March.
    20. Clay M. Voorhees & Michael K. Brady & Roger Calantone & Edward Ramirez, 2016. "Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 119-134, January.
    21. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & María D Odriozola & José Luis Fernández Sánchez, 2016. "Transparency through European corporate governance codes," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(3), pages 244-261, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pinyarat Sirisomboonsuk & James Burns, 2023. "Sustainability in Supply Chains through Rapid Capacity Increases and Minimized Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Najuwa Mohd Nasir & Haliza Mohd Zahari & Rozita Husain, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review on Logistics Information Needs for Sharing in Malaysian Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Muhammad Ashfaque & Syed Mohsin Ali Shah & Fahad Sultan & Haider Khalil & Arif Hussain & Muhammad Khan, 2020. "Ethical Value Propositions of Islamic Banking Products: A Phenomenological Inquiry of Relationship Managers Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 8-14.
    4. Muhammad Khan & Marwan Khan & Abbas Ali & Muhammad Imran Khan & Ihsan Ullah & Muhammad Iqbal, 2022. "Digitalization for Fast, Fair, and Safe Humanitarian Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Jakub Marcinkowski, 2022. "Humanitarian Actors’ Cooperation Network in the Social Sustainability Context. Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Zuhal Cilingir Uk & Cigdem Basfirinci & Amit Mitra, 2022. "Weighted Interpretive Structural Modeling for Supply Chain Risk Management: An Application to Logistics Service Providers in Turkey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Amin Chegenizadeh & Natasya Ghinna Humaira & Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Hamid Nikraz, 2023. "Corporate Governance Research in Asian Countries: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis (2001–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Muhammad Khan & Gohar Saleem Parvaiz & Abbas Ali & Majid Jehangir & Noor Hassan & Junghan Bae, 2022. "A Model for Understanding the Mediating Association of Transparency between Emerging Technologies and Humanitarian Logistics Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Shakir Ullah & Sergey Barykin & Ma Jianfu & Taher Saifuddin & Mohammed Arshad Khan & Ruben Kazaryan, 2023. "Green Practices in Mega Development Projects of China–Pakistan Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Fan Chen & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "Horizontal Coordination of I-LNGOs in the Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Chenglin Liu & Kai Sun & Luchuan Liu, 2023. "The Formation and Transformation Mechanisms of Deep Consumer Engagement and Purchase Behavior in E-Commerce Live Streaming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Muhammad Khan & Gohar Saleem Parvaiz & Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov, 2022. "The Impact of Technologies of Traceability and Transparency in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Muhammad Khan & Amal Nasser Alshahrani & Julija Jacquemod, 2023. "Digital Platforms and Supply Chain Traceability for Robust Information and Effective Inventory Management: The Mediating Role of Transparency," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Muhammad Shafiq & Adeel Akhtar & Muhammad Ismail & Muhammad Awais, 2021. "Lean Management Readiness Assessment Framework For Humanitarian Organizations Supply Chain Management," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 151-171, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Capaldo, Antonio & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "How does trust affect performance in the supply chain? The moderating role of interdependence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 36-49.
    2. repec:dgr:rugsom:04g06 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Matthew J. Robson & Constantine S. Katsikeas & Daniel C. Bello, 2008. "Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Organizational Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 647-665, August.
    5. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    6. Delbufalo, Emanuela, 2015. "Subjective trust and perceived risk influences on exchange performance in supplier–manufacturer relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 84-101.
    7. Jong, Gjalt de & Klein Woolthuis, Rosalinde, 2004. "The effects of trust on performance of high-tech business relationships," Research Report 04G06, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    8. Ebers, Mark & Semrau, Thorsten, 2015. "What drives the allocation of specific investments between buyer and supplier?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 415-424.
    9. Son, Byung-Gak & Lee, Chang-Hun & Ha, Byoung-Chun & Nam, Hyunjeong, 2019. "Investigating the fair treatment of suppliers and its trust fostering role and performance benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 54-66.
    10. Bianchi, Constanza C. & Saleh, Md. Abu, 2011. "Antecedents of importer relationship performance in Latin America," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 258-265, March.
    11. Hwang, Peter, 2006. "Asset specificity and the fear of exploitation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 423-438, July.
    12. Holtgrave, Maximilian & Nienaber, Ann-Marie & Ferreira, Carlos, 2017. "Untangling the trust–control nexus in international buyer–supplier exchange relationships: An investigation of the changing world regarding relationship length," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 523-537.
    13. Panayides, Photis M. & Venus Lun, Y.H., 2009. "The impact of trust on innovativeness and supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 35-46, November.
    14. Rameshwar Dubey & Nezih Altay & Constantin Blome, 2019. "Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 159-177, December.
    15. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Ranjay Gulati & Maxim Sytch, 2008. "Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2-3), pages 165-190.
    17. Bianchi, Constanza & Abu Saleh, Md., 2020. "Investigating SME importer–foreign supplier relationship trust and commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 572-584.
    18. Li, Weizi & Islam, Aaquib & Johnson, Kevin & Lauchande, Priam & Shang, Xiaopu & Xu, Shen, 2018. "Understanding inter-organizational trust among integrated care service provider networks: A perspective on organizational asymmetries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(12), pages 1356-1363.
    19. Bill McEvily & Akbar Zaheer & Darcy K. Fudge Kamal, 2017. "Mutual and Exclusive: Dyadic Sources of Trust in Interorganizational Exchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 74-92, February.
    20. repec:dgr:rugsom:03g23 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Ojha, Divesh & Shockley, Jeff & Acharya, Chandan, 2016. "Supply chain organizational infrastructure for promoting entrepreneurial emphasis and innovativeness: The role of trust and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 212-227.
    22. Mausumi Saha & Sharmistha Banerjee, 2015. "Impact of Social Capital on Small Firm Performance in West Bengal," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 24(2), pages 91-114, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2078-:d:220755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.