IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i1p232-d127412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affective Policy Performance Evaluation Model: A Case of an International Trade Policy Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Inwon Kang

    (Department of International Business and Trade, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Hae Seok Jee

    (School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Matthew Minsuk Shin

    (Department of International Trade, College of Social Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

Abstract

Firms often superficially adopt policies because of governmental rules and regulations, so as to avoid penalties or to gain benefits. However, the evaluation and characterization of those kinds of adoptions as policy performance distorts the true level of policy performance: social sustainability. This study proposes an affective policy performance evaluation model. The attitudes of employees toward adopting a policy are characterized into genuine and superficial compliance. Their behaviors are explained through voluntary and opportunistic adoptions. In order to validate the proposed model, a survey was conducted on an international trade policy target group ( n = 216) for the Strategic Trade Control System (STCS), in order to understand their attitudes toward adopting the policy. The survey data was analyzed by a structural equation modeling method. The measures of the factors in the proposed model are adopted and modified from existing studies. The most effective resources of policy implementation on the firms’ genuine and superficial compliance and ultimately on the firms’ voluntary policy adoption are revealed through the analysis. Based on the results, this study presents a strategy for allocating and managing policy implementation resources to exclusively encourage firms’ trade policy adoptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Inwon Kang & Hae Seok Jee & Matthew Minsuk Shin, 2018. "Affective Policy Performance Evaluation Model: A Case of an International Trade Policy Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:232-:d:127412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric W. Welch & Allan Mazur & Stuart Bretschneider, 2000. "Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: Levels of adoption and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 407-425.
    2. M. Minsuk Shin & Eun Jeong Noh & Jiwon Lee, 2017. "Erratum to: Study abroad programs as a service convergence: an international marketing approach," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(3), pages 693-693, September.
    3. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Does Profit-Seeking Rule Out Love? Evidence (or Not) from Economics and Law," GDAE Working Papers 10-06, GDAE, Tufts University.
    4. Wim Naudé, 2011. "Climate Change and Industrial Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Bertrand Venard, 2008. "Organizational isomorphism and corruption," Post-Print hal-00760557, HAL.
    6. Jale Tosun & Christoph Knill, 2009. "Economy and Sustainability—How Economic Integration Stimulates Stringent Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Sarah L. Stafford, 2006. "State Adoption Of Environmental Audit Initiatives," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 24(1), pages 172-187, January.
    8. Matthew Fuhrmann, 2008. "Exporting Mass Destruction? The Determinants of Dual-Use Trade," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 45(5), pages 633-652, September.
    9. Andrea Kollmann & Friedrich Schneider, 2010. "Why Does Environmental Policy in Representative Democracies Tend to Be Inadequate? A Preliminary Public Choice Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(12), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Isabel Maria Freitas Bodas & Nick von Tunzelmann, 2008. "Mapping public support for innovation: a comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01487464, HAL.
    11. Bertrand Venard & Mohamed Hanafi, 2008. "Organizational Isomorphism and Corruption in Financial Institutions: Empirical Research in Emerging Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 481-498, August.
    12. Wieland, Volker, 2000. "Monetary policy, parameter uncertainty and optimal learning," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 199-228, August.
    13. Kenneth A. Bollen, 1989. "A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 17(3), pages 303-316, February.
    14. Schaltegger, Stefan & Burritt, Roger L., 2010. "Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 375-384, October.
    15. Andrew Jordan & Rüdiger K. W. Wurzel & Anthony Zito, 2005. "The Rise of 'New' Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53, pages 477-496, October.
    16. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2007. "Public Voluntary Programs Reconsidered," Working Papers 2007-07, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    17. Andrew Jordan & Rüdiger K. W. Wurzel & Anthony Zito, 2005. "The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(3), pages 477-496, October.
    18. Rick S. Kurtz, 2010. "Public Lands Policy and Economic Trends in Gateway Communities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(1), pages 77-88, January.
    19. Isabel Maria Freitas Bodas & Nick von Tunzelmann, 2008. "Mapping public support for innovation: a comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France," Post-Print hal-01487464, HAL.
    20. Michael Howlett & Jonathan Kim & Paul Weaver, 2006. "Assessing Instrument Mixes through Program‐ and Agency‐Level Data: Methodological Issues in Contemporary Implementation Research," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 23(1), pages 129-151, January.
    21. Masaaki Kotabe & Michael R Czinkota, 1992. "State Government Promotion of Manufacturing Exports: A Gap Analysis," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 23(4), pages 637-658, December.
    22. Kang, Inwon & Lee, Geon C. & Park, Chanuk & Shin, Matthew M., 2013. "Tailored and targeted communication strategies for encouraging voluntary adoption of non-preferred public policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 24-37.
    23. Goebel, Philipp & Reuter, Carsten & Pibernik, Richard & Sichtmann, Christina, 2012. "The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 7-17.
    24. Bertrand Venard & Mohamed Hanafi, 2008. "Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions. An empirical research in emerging countries," Post-Print hal-00765483, HAL.
    25. Hã‰Ritier, Adrienne & Lehmkuhl, Dirk, 2008. "The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 1-17, April.
    26. Marvell, Thomas B & Moody, Carlisle E, 2001. "The Lethal Effects of Three-Strikes Laws," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 89-106, January.
    27. Jing Li & Yong Li, 2010. "Flexibility versus commitment: MNEs’ ownership strategy in China," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(9), pages 1550-1571, December.
    28. Sharif, Naubahar & Huang, Can, 2012. "Innovation strategy, firm survival and relocation: The case of Hong Kong-owned manufacturing in Guangdong Province, China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 69-78.
    29. Tom Kuhlman & John Farrington, 2010. "What is Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(11), pages 1-13, November.
    30. Su-Yol Lee & Yong Won Seo, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility Motive Attribution by Service Employees in the Parcel Logistics Industry as a Moderator between CSR Perception and Organizational Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, February.
    31. P. M. Bentler & Chih-Ping Chou, 1987. "Practical Issues in Structural Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(1), pages 78-117, August.
    32. Anne Boomsma, 1985. "Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in lisrel maximum likelihood estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 229-242, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afrizal & Elfitra & Zuldesni, 2023. "Analysing the effectiveness of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil's Free, Prior and Informed Consent policy to respect customary land rights," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(5), pages 761-780, July.
    2. Li-Hsing Ho & Chen-Cheng Tsai, 2018. "A Model Constructed to Evaluate Sustainable Operation and Development of State-Owned Enterprises after Restructuring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reinhard Steurer, 2013. "Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(4), pages 387-410, December.
    2. Jeroen Heijden, 2014. "Experimentation in policy design: insights from the building sector," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(3), pages 249-266, September.
    3. J. David Cummins & Bertrand Venard, 2008. "Insurance Market Dynamics: Between Global Developments and Local Contingencies," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 11(2), pages 295-326, September.
    4. Niclas Meyer, 2012. "Political Contestation in the Shadow of Hierarchy," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 46, European Institute, LSE.
    5. Yongqiang Gao, 2011. "Government Intervention, Perceived Benefit, and Bribery of Firms in Transitional China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 175-184, December.
    6. Dennis Schoeneborn & Fabian Homberg, 2018. "Goffman’s Return to Las Vegas: Studying Corruption as Social Interaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 37-54, August.
    7. Noman Shaheer & Jingtao Yi & Sali Li & Liang Chen, 2019. "State-Owned Enterprises as Bribe Payers: The Role of Institutional Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 221-238, September.
    8. Niclas Meyer, 2012. "Political Contestation in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 6, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    9. Dawn L. Keig & Lance Eliot Brouthers & Victor B. Marshall, 2015. "Formal and Informal Corruption Environments and Multinational Enterprise Social Irresponsibility," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 89-116, January.
    10. Chris Bell & Kelley Main, 2011. "Deonance and Distrust: Motivated Third Party Information Seeking Following Disclosure of an Agent’s Unethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-96, August.
    11. Leyla Orudzheva & Manjula S. Salimath & Robert Pavur, 2020. "Vortex of Corruption: Longitudinal Analysis of Normative Pressures in Top Global Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 529-551, May.
    12. Maider Aldaz Odriozola & Igor Álvarez Etxeberria, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Anti-Corruption Disclosure: The Case of the Emerging Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Ufere, Nnaoke & Gaskin, James & Perelli, Sheri & Somers, Antoinette & Boland, Richard, 2020. "Why is bribery pervasive among firms in sub-Saharan African countries? Multi-industry empirical evidence of organizational isomorphism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 92-104.
    14. Davide Torsello & Bertrand Venard, 2015. "The Anthropology of Corruption," Post-Print hal-01238748, HAL.
    15. Xie, Jun & Zhang, Yifan, 2020. "Anti-corruption, government intervention, and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(1).
    16. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Lin, Chun-Wei, 2016. "Globalization, political institutions, financial liberalization, and performance of the insurance industry," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 244-266.
    17. Abdul Waheed & Qingyu Zhang, 2022. "Effect of CSR and Ethical Practices on Sustainable Competitive Performance: A Case of Emerging Markets from Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 837-855, February.
    18. David Xu & Ronald Cenfetelli & Karl Aquino, 2012. "The Influence of Media Cue Multiplicity on Deceivers and Those Who Are Deceived," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 337-352, March.
    19. Bertrand Venard, 2009. "Corruption in emerging countries: A matter of isomorphism," Post-Print hal-00771103, HAL.
    20. Eurídice Mamede de Andrade & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues & José Paulo Cosenza, 2020. "Corporate Behavior: An Exploratory Study of the Brazilian Tax Management from a Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:232-:d:127412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.