IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i20p4386-d1264898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Functional Data Approach for Continuous-Time Analysis Subject to Modeling Discrepancy under Infill Asymptotics

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Chen

    (Department of Economics, Cross Appointed to Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Big Data Research Lab, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Labor and Worklife Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
    Ordered Number Technology Inc., Shanghai 200131, China)

  • Yixuan Li

    (Big Data Research Lab, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Department of Anthropology, Economics and Political Science, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB T5J 4S2, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Renfang Tian

    (Big Data Research Lab, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    School of Management, Economics, and Mathematics, King’s University College at Western University, London, ON N6A 2M3, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Parametric continuous-time analysis often entails derivations of continuous-time models from predefined discrete formulations. However, undetermined convergence rates of frequency-dependent parameters can result in ill-defined continuous-time limits, leading to modeling discrepancy, which impairs the reliability of fitting and forecasting. To circumvent this issue, we propose a simple solution based on functional data analysis (FDA) and truncated Taylor series expansions. It is demonstrated through a simulation study that our proposed method is superior—compared with misspecified parametric methods—in fitting and forecasting continuous-time stochastic processes, while the parametric method slightly dominates under correct specification, with comparable forecast errors to the FDA-based method. Due to its generally consistent and more robust performance against possible misspecification, the proposed FDA-based method is recommended in the presence of modeling discrepancy. Further, we apply the proposed method to predict the future return of the S&P 500, utilizing observations extracted from a latent continuous-time process, and show the practical efficacy of our approach in accurately discerning the underlying dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Chen & Yixuan Li & Renfang Tian, 2023. "A Functional Data Approach for Continuous-Time Analysis Subject to Modeling Discrepancy under Infill Asymptotics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:20:p:4386-:d:1264898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/20/4386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/20/4386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatai Adewole Adebayo & Ramysamy Sivasamy & Dahud Kehinde Shangodoyin, 2014. "Forecasting Stock Market Series with ARIMA Model," Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 1-3.
    2. Nelson, Daniel B., 1990. "ARCH models as diffusion approximations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-2), pages 7-38.
    3. Das, Sanjiv R., 2002. "The surprise element: jumps in interest rates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 27-65, January.
    4. Davidson, James, 1994. "Stochastic Limit Theory: An Introduction for Econometricians," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774037.
    5. Jin‐Chuan Duan & Peter Ritchken & Zhiqiang Sun, 2006. "Approximating Garch‐Jump Models, Jump‐Diffusion Processes, And Option Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 21-52, January.
    6. Kurisu, Daisuke, 2019. "On nonparametric inference for spatial regression models under domain expanding and infill asymptotics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    8. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    9. Asger Lunde & Peter Reinhard Hansen, 2001. "A Forecast Comparison of Volatility Models: Does Anything Beat a GARCH(1,1)?," Working Papers 2001-04, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    10. Siegfried Heiler, 1999. "A Survey on Nonparametric Time Series Analysis," Finance 9904005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Andrew W. Lo & Harry Mamaysky & Jiang Wang, 2000. "Foundations of Technical Analysis: Computational Algorithms, Statistical Inference, and Empirical Implementation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1705-1765, August.
    12. Durham, Garland B & Gallant, A Ronald, 2002. "Numerical Techniques for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Continuous-Time Diffusion Processes," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 297-316, July.
    13. Ai[diaeresis]t-Sahalia, Yacine & Kimmel, Robert, 2007. "Maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic volatility models," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 413-452, February.
    14. Heiler, Siegfried, 1999. "A Survey on Nonparametric Time Series Analysis," CoFE Discussion Papers 99/05, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    15. Hafner, Christian M. & Laurent, Sebastien & Violante, Francesco, 2017. "Weak Diffusion Limits Of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 691-716, June.
    16. Meddahi, N., 2001. "An Eigenfunction Approach for Volatility Modeling," Cahiers de recherche 2001-29, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    17. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    18. Asger Lunde & Peter R. Hansen, 2005. "A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(7), pages 873-889.
    19. Sundaresan, S.M., 2000. "Continuous-Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Papers 00-03, Columbia - Graduate School of Business.
    20. Wolfgang Härdle & Helmut Lütkepohl & Rong Chen, 1997. "A Review of Nonparametric Time Series Analysis," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 65(1), pages 49-72, April.
    21. Durham, Garland B & Gallant, A Ronald, 2002. "Numerical Techniques for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Continuous-Time Diffusion Processes: Reply," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 335-338, July.
    22. Corradi, Valentina, 2000. "Reconsidering the continuous time limit of the GARCH(1, 1) process," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 145-153, May.
    23. Buccheri, Giuseppe & Corsi, Fulvio & Flandoli, Franco & Livieri, Giulia, 2021. "The continuous-time limit of score-driven volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 655-675.
    24. Gerda Claeskens & Tatyana Krivobokova & Jean D. Opsomer, 2009. "Asymptotic properties of penalized spline estimators," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 529-544.
    25. Leitch, Gordon & Tanner, J Ernest, 1991. "Economic Forecast Evaluation: Profits versus the Conventional Error Measures," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(3), pages 580-590, June.
    26. Chen, Tao & DeJuan, Joseph & Tian, Renfang, 2018. "Distributions of GDP across versions of the Penn World Tables: A functional data analysis approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 179-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Jun & Yang, Zhenlin & Zhang, Xibin, 2006. "A class of nonlinear stochastic volatility models and its implications for pricing currency options," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 2218-2231, December.
    2. David Feldman & Xin Xu, 2018. "Equilibrium-based volatility models of the market portfolio rate of return (peacock tails or stotting gazelles)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(2), pages 493-518, March.
    3. Jules Clement Mba & Sutene Mwambi, 2020. "A Markov-switching COGARCH approach to cryptocurrency portfolio selection and optimization," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(2), pages 199-214, June.
    4. Buccheri, Giuseppe & Corsi, Fulvio & Flandoli, Franco & Livieri, Giulia, 2021. "The continuous-time limit of score-driven volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 655-675.
    5. Charles, Amélie, 2010. "The day-of-the-week effects on the volatility: The role of the asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 143-152, April.
    6. Gatfaoui, Hayette, 2013. "Translating financial integration into correlation risk: A weekly reporting's viewpoint for the volatility behavior of stock markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 776-791.
    7. repec:uts:finphd:39 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Ding, Yashuang (Dexter), 2023. "A simple joint model for returns, volatility and volatility of volatility," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 521-543.
    9. Song, Xinyu & Wang, Yazhen, 2020. "GARCH quasi-likelihood ratios for SV model and the diffusion limit," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. repec:uts:finphd:38 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Eyden Samunderu & Yvonne T. Murahwa, 2021. "Return Based Risk Measures for Non-Normally Distributed Returns: An Alternative Modelling Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-48, November.
    12. Kleppe, Tore Selland & Yu, Jun & Skaug, Hans J., 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of partially observed diffusion models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 73-80.
    13. Torben G. Andersen & Tim Bollerslev & Peter F. Christoffersen & Francis X. Diebold, 2005. "Volatility Forecasting," PIER Working Paper Archive 05-011, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    14. Fei Su, 2018. "Essays on Price Discovery and Volatility Dynamics in the Foreign Exchange Market," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 2-2018.
    15. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier, 2014. "Volatility persistence in crude oil markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 729-742.
    16. Andersen, Torben G. & Bollerslev, Tim & Christoffersen, Peter F. & Diebold, Francis X., 2006. "Volatility and Correlation Forecasting," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 15, pages 777-878, Elsevier.
    17. Badescu, Alexandru & Elliott, Robert J. & Ortega, Juan-Pablo, 2015. "Non-Gaussian GARCH option pricing models and their diffusion limits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 820-830.
    18. Fornari, Fabio & Mele, Antonio, 2006. "Approximating volatility diffusions with CEV-ARCH models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 931-966, June.
    19. Minot, Nicholas, 2014. "Food price volatility in sub-Saharan Africa: Has it really increased?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 45-56.
    20. Takahashi, Makoto & Watanabe, Toshiaki & Omori, Yasuhiro, 2016. "Volatility and quantile forecasts by realized stochastic volatility models with generalized hyperbolic distribution," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 437-457.
    21. Harry-Paul Vander Elst, 2015. "FloGARCH: Realizing Long Memory and Asymmetries in Returns Valitility," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2015-12, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    22. Dutta, Shantanu & Essaddam, Naceur & Kumar, Vinod & Saadi, Samir, 2017. "How does electronic trading affect efficiency of stock market and conditional volatility? Evidence from Toronto Stock Exchange," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(PB), pages 867-877.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:20:p:4386-:d:1264898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.