IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i14p5314-d1191768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expectations for Bioenergy Considering Carbon Neutrality Targets in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Proskurina

    (LUT School of Energy Systema, LUT University, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Clara Mendoza-Martinez

    (LUT School of Energy Systema, LUT University, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

Abstract

The EU has set the ambitious target of raising the share of EU energy consumption produced from renewable resources to 32% by 2030, with a target of climate neutrality by 2050. The aim of this paper is to assess the role of biomass usage in the context of these targets. The paper identifies the progress made between 2013 and 2022 by focusing on a selection of EU countries. The largest bioenergy increments of 130, 77, and 60 PJ were reported for Poland, Sweden, and the Netherlands. This study evaluates the crucial role of co-generation and heat in EU regions, with biomass usage between 55 and 80% of the combined heat and power (CHP) energy in Nordic countries. The future perspectives for bioenergy based on EU policies, biomass resources, and technical issues were addressed. The EU possesses around 9% of the global biomass supply, ensuring a certain level of biomass resource dependence. Thus, the biomass usage demand in energy production, non-energy sectors, and transport is expected to rise, leading to increments of 13–76% on biomass imports. It appears that bioenergy development is mostly limited by economic issues and uneven support for bioenergy in different EU countries as well as environmental issues. The study shows a promising and sustainable potential of bioenergy in the EU as a renewable energy source while minimizing negative impacts on the environment and the economy. By 2050, liquid biofuels are likely to be increasingly used in the transport sector. Non-energy sector usage of biomass is still in an early stage of development, except for the pulp and paper industry, and significant use of biomass in non-energy sectors seems unlikely in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Proskurina & Clara Mendoza-Martinez, 2023. "Expectations for Bioenergy Considering Carbon Neutrality Targets in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5314-:d:1191768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Monforti-Ferrario, Fabio & Banja, Manjola & Motola, Vincenzo, 2015. "Renewable energy policy framework and bioenergy contribution in the European Union – An overview from National Renewable Energy Action Plans and Progress Reports," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 969-985.
    2. O’Connell, Adrian & Kousoulidou, Marina & Lonza, Laura & Weindorf, Werner, 2019. "Considerations on GHG emissions and energy balances of promising aviation biofuel pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 504-515.
    3. Marek Wieruszewski & Aleksandra Górna & Zygmunt Stanula & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Energy Use of Woody Biomass in Poland: Its Resources and Harvesting Form," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Malico, Isabel & Nepomuceno Pereira, Ricardo & Gonçalves, Ana Cristina & Sousa, Adélia M.O., 2019. "Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 960-977.
    5. Proskurina, Svetlana & Heinimö, Jussi & Schipfer, Fabian & Vakkilainen, Esa, 2017. "Biomass for industrial applications: The role of torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 265-274.
    6. Suttles, Shellye A. & Tyner, Wallace E. & Shively, Gerald & Sands, Ronald D. & Sohngen, Brent, 2014. "Economic effects of bioenergy policy in the United States and Europe: A general equilibrium approach focusing on forest biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 428-436.
    7. Ovaere, Marten & Proost, Stef, 2022. "Cost-effective reduction of fossil energy use in the European transport sector: An assessment of the Fit for 55 Package," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Kim, Yohan & Lee, Joosung & Ahn, Jaemyung, 2019. "Innovation towards sustainable technologies: A socio-technical perspective on accelerating transition to aviation biofuel," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 317-329.
    9. Proskurina, Svetlana & Alakangas, Eija & Heinimö, Jussi & Mikkilä, Mirja & Vakkilainen, Esa, 2017. "A survey analysis of the wood pellet industry in Finland: Future perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 692-704.
    10. Millinger, M. & Reichenberg, L. & Hedenus, F. & Berndes, G. & Zeyen, E. & Brown, T., 2022. "Are biofuel mandates cost-effective? - An analysis of transport fuels and biomass usage to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    11. Chiaramonti, David & Talluri, Giacomo & Scarlat, Nicolae & Prussi, Matteo, 2021. "The challenge of forecasting the role of biofuel in EU transport decarbonisation at 2050: A meta-analysis review of published scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glasenapp, S. & Fonseca, M. & Weimar, H. & Döring, P. & Aguilar, F.X., 2021. "Conversion factors for residential wood energy in the European Union: an introduction to harmonizing units of measurement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Ahmad, Salman & Ouenniche, Jamal & Kolosz, Ben W. & Greening, Philip & Andresen, John M. & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Xu, Bing, 2021. "A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    3. Malico, Isabel & Nepomuceno Pereira, Ricardo & Gonçalves, Ana Cristina & Sousa, Adélia M.O., 2019. "Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 960-977.
    4. Kamel Almutairi & Greg Thoma & Alvaro Durand-Morat, 2018. "Ex-Ante Analysis of Economic, Social and Environmental Impacts of Large-Scale Renewable and Nuclear Energy Targets for Global Electricity Generation by 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Wang Liang & Pavlina Nanou & Heather Wray & Jianliang Zhang & Ingemar Lundstrom & Stefan Lundqvist & Chuan Wang, 2022. "Feasibility Study of Bio-Sludge Hydrochar as Blast Furnace Injectant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Giuseppe Maggiotto & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2023. "Thermochemical Technologies for the Optimization of Olive Wood Biomass Energy Exploitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2019. "Technological Innovation in Biomass Energy for the Sustainable Growth of Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Wang, Xuebin & Zhang, Jiaye & Xu, Xinwei & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Li, Yan & Zhou, Yuegui & Tan, Houzhang, 2020. "Numerical study of biomass Co-firing under Oxy-MILD mode," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2566-2576.
    9. Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Pan, Junting & Peng, Wanxi & Wang, Yajing & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "The potential of aquatic weed as a resource for sustainable bioenergy sources and bioproducts production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    10. Eduardo Polloni-Silva & Diogo Ferraz & Flávia de Castro Camioto & Daisy Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto & Herick Fernando Moralles, 2021. "Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Pollution-Halo/Haven Hypotheses: An Investigation in Brazilian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Dastan Bamwesigye & Petr Kupec & Georges Chekuimo & Jindrich Pavlis & Obed Asamoah & Samuel Antwi Darkwah & Petra Hlaváčková, 2020. "Charcoal and Wood Biomass Utilization in Uganda: The Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Savvas L. Douvartzides & Nikolaos D. Charisiou & Kyriakos N. Papageridis & Maria A. Goula, 2019. "Green Diesel: Biomass Feedstocks, Production Technologies, Catalytic Research, Fuel Properties and Performance in Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-41, February.
    14. Hamid R. Khosravani & María Del Mar Castilla & Manuel Berenguel & Antonio E. Ruano & Pedro M. Ferreira, 2016. "A Comparison of Energy Consumption Prediction Models Based on Neural Networks of a Bioclimatic Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Furmankiewicz, Marek & Hewitt, Richard J. & Kazak, Jan K., 2021. "Can rural stakeholders drive the low-carbon transition? Analysis of climate-related activities planned in local development strategies in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    16. Leonel J.R. Nunes & Jorge T. Pereira da Costa & Radu Godina & João C.O. Matias & João P.S. Catalão, 2020. "A Logistics Management System for a Biomass-to-Energy Production Plant Storage Park," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Pablo-Romero, María del P. & Sánchez-Braza, Antonio & Salvador-Ponce, Jesús & Sánchez-Labrador, Natalia, 2017. "An overview of feed-in tariffs, premiums and tenders to promote electricity from biogas in the EU-28," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1366-1379.
    18. Florian Gaman & Cristina Iacoboaea & Mihaela Aldea & Oana Luca & Adrian Andrei Stănescu & Carmen Mihaela Boteanu, 2022. "Energy Transition in Marginalized Urban Areas: The Case of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Magiri-Skouloudi, Despina & Grimekis, Dimitrios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Εnergy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass-fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 252-269.
    20. Jorge Miguel Carneiro Ribeiro & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias & Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes, 2018. "Future Perspectives of Biomass Torrefaction: Review of the Current State-Of-The-Art and Research Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5314-:d:1191768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.