IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v154y2020icp252-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Εnergy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass-fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling

Author

Listed:
  • Braimakis, Konstantinos
  • Magiri-Skouloudi, Despina
  • Grimekis, Dimitrios
  • Karellas, Sotirios

Abstract

The use of biomass in combined heat and power (CHP) plants with district heating and cooling is necessary for achieving decarbonization targets. While in traditional biomass plants steam temperature is below 520 °C, new developments can lead to ultra-supercritical (USC) designs with steam temperatures of 600 °C. The present study investigates the performance of such plants for covering the heat demands of the aluminum and pulp and paper industrial processes, while also producing district heating and cooling. Plant performance is assessed through sensitivity analyses covering a wide range of heat demand scenarios. In the electricity-only scenarios, the electric and exergetic electric efficiencies of the aluminum/pulp and paper plants are 43.45/44.22% and 38.93/39.62%, respectively. In the CHP scenario, when the heat demand is maximized, the electric, exergetic electric, CHP and exergetic CHP efficiencies of the aluminum/pulp and paper plants are 21.81%/34.32%, 19.54%/31.70%, 92.50%/86.76% and 39.43%/39.01%, respectively. With the integration of cooling, the electric and CCHP efficiencies of the aluminum plant are 21.60% and 89.23%, respectively. Most of the exergy is destroyed during the combustion and steam generation processes, corresponding to 67–70% and 13–16% of the total exergy destruction, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Braimakis, Konstantinos & Magiri-Skouloudi, Despina & Grimekis, Dimitrios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Εnergy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass-fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 252-269.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:252-269
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014812030286X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2014. "Efficiency analysis of a hard-coal-fired supercritical power plant with a four-end high-temperature membrane for air separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 109-119.
    2. Deboni, Tamires Liza & Simioni, Flávio José & Brand, Martha Andreia & Lopes, Gisele Paim, 2019. "Evolution of the quality of forest biomass for energy generation in a cogeneration plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1291-1302.
    3. Xu, Cheng & Xu, Gang & Zhao, Shifei & Zhou, Luyao & Yang, Yongping & Zhang, Dongke, 2015. "An improved configuration of lignite pre-drying using a supplementary steam cycle in a lignite fired supercritical power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 882-891.
    4. Yan, Linbo & Wang, Ziqi & Cao, Yang & He, Boshu, 2020. "Comparative evaluation of two biomass direct-fired power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1188-1198.
    5. Malico, Isabel & Nepomuceno Pereira, Ricardo & Gonçalves, Ana Cristina & Sousa, Adélia M.O., 2019. "Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 960-977.
    6. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    7. Kalina, Jacek & Świerzewski, Mateusz, 2019. "Identification of ORC unit operation in biomass-fired cogeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 400-414.
    8. Vu, Thang Toan & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Daesung & Mun, Tae-Young & Moon, Ji-Hong & Sun, Dowon & Hwang, Yoon-Tae & Lee, Jae-Goo & Park, Young Cheol, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of ultra-supercritical power plants using air- and oxy-combustion circulating fluidized bed with and without CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    9. Gadd, Henrik & Werner, Sven, 2014. "Achieving low return temperatures from district heating substations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 59-67.
    10. Mallaki, Mehrdad & Fatehi, Rouhollah, 2014. "Design of a biomass power plant for burning date palm waste to cogenerate electricity and distilled water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 286-291.
    11. Kler, Aleksandr M. & Zharkov, Pavel V. & Epishkin, Nikolai O., 2019. "Parametric optimization of supercritical power plants using gradient methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Lee, See Hoon & Lee, Tae Hee & Jeong, Sang Mun & Lee, Jong Min, 2019. "Economic analysis of a 600 mwe ultra supercritical circulating fluidized bed power plant based on coal tax and biomass co-combustion plans," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 121-127.
    13. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    14. Liu, Yinhe & Li, Qinlun & Duan, Xiaoli & Zhang, Yun & Yang, Zhen & Che, Defu, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a modified system for a 1000 MW single reheat ultra-supercritical thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 25-37.
    15. Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2014. "Economic analysis of a supercritical coal-fired CHP plant integrated with an absorption carbon capture installation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 513-523.
    16. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    17. Zhao, Zhigang & Su, Sheng & Si, Ningning & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Xu, Jun & Jiang, Long & Chen, Gang & Xiang, Jun, 2017. "Exergy analysis of the turbine system in a 1000 MW double reheat ultra-supercritical power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 540-548.
    18. Uris, María & Linares, José Ignacio & Arenas, Eva, 2014. "Techno-economic feasibility assessment of a biomass cogeneration plant based on an Organic Rankine Cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 707-713.
    19. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Atsonios, Konstantinos & Panopoulos, Kyriakos D. & Karellas, Sotirios & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2014. "Economic evaluation of decentralized pyrolysis for the production of bio-oil as an energy carrier for improved logistics towards a large centralized gasification plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 57-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Figaj, Rafał, 2021. "Performance assessment of a renewable micro-scale trigeneration system based on biomass steam cycle, wind turbine, photovoltaic field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 193-208.
    2. Li, Ruonan & Mhaskar, Prashant & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2021. "Integration of energy systems for buildings and light industrial plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Syrodoy, S.V. & Kuznetsov, G.V. & Gutareva, N. Yu & Nigay (Ivanova), N.A., 2022. "Mathematical modeling of the thermochemical processes of sequestration of SOx when burning the particles of the coal and wood mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1392-1409.
    5. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Tozlu, Alperen & Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad, 2021. "District heating and electricity production based on biogas produced from municipal WWTPs in Turkey: A comprehensive case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Azarpour, Abbas & Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, Mohamad & Hajizadeh, Abdollah & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2022. "Systematic energy and exergy assessment of a hydropurification process: Theoretical and practical insights," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    7. Wang, Shuhang & Wang, Xu & Fu, Zhenghui & Liu, Feng & Xu, Ye & Li, Wei, 2022. "A novel energy-water nexus based CHP operation optimization model under water shortage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yanhong & Cao, Lihua & Hu, Pengfei & Li, Bo & Li, Yong, 2019. "Model establishment and performance evaluation of a modified regenerative system for a 660 MW supercritical unit running at the IPT-setting mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 890-915.
    2. Opriș, Ioana & Cenușă, Victor-Eduard, 2023. "Parametric and heuristic optimization of multiple schemes with double-reheat ultra-supercritical steam power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Xu, Cheng & Zhang, Qiang & Yang, Zhiping & Li, Xiaosa & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improved supercritical coal-fired power generation system incorporating a supplementary supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1319-1329.
    4. Zima, Wiesław & Nowak-Ocłoń, Marzena & Ocłoń, Paweł, 2015. "Simulation of fluid heating in combustion chamber waterwalls of boilers for supercritical steam parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P1), pages 117-127.
    5. Seo, Su Been & Kim, Hyung Woo & Kang, Seo Yeong & Go, Eun Sol & Keel, Sang In & Lee, See Hoon, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison between air-fired and oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed power plants with ultra-supercritical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Zhang, Shunqi & Liu, Ming & Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Jiping & Yan, Junjie, 2021. "Flexibility assessment of a modified double-reheat Rankine cycle integrating a regenerative turbine during recuperative heater shutdown processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2015. "An analysis of the investment risk related to the integration of a supercritical coal-fired combined heat and power plant with an absorption installation for CO2 separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 423-435.
    8. Wang, Chaoyang & Qiao, Yongqiang & Liu, Ming & Zhao, Yongliang & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Enhancing peak shaving capability by optimizing reheat-steam temperature control of a double-reheat boiler," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2015. "Influence of four-end HTM (high temperature membrane) parameters on the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of a supercritical power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 662-673.
    10. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Carlos Acevedo Peñaloza & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2019. "Thermoeconomic Optimization with PSO Algorithm of Waste Heat Recovery Systems Based on Organic Rankine Cycle System for a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    12. Chen, Heng & Qi, Zhen & Dai, Lihao & Li, Bin & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2020. "Performance evaluation of a new conceptual combustion air preheating system in a 1000 MW coal-fueled power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Ling, Jester Lih Jie & Oh, Seung Seok & Park, Hyun Jun & Lee, See Hoon, 2023. "Process simulation and economic evaluation of a biomass oxygen fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor with an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Han, Yu & Sun, Yingying, 2020. "Collaborative optimization of energy conversion and NOx removal in boiler cold-end of coal-fired power plants based on waste heat recovery of flue gas and sensible heat utilization of extraction steam," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    15. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2016. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a supercritical and an ultracritical oxy-type power plant without and with waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 806-820.
    16. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Grispos, Victoras & Karellas, Sotirios, 2021. "Exergetic efficiency potential of double-stage ORCs with zeotropic mixtures of natural hydrocarbons and CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Kan & Li, Daijin & Luo, Kai & Dang, Jianjun, 2020. "Potential of Organic Rankine Cycles for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Giuseppe Maggiotto & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2023. "Thermochemical Technologies for the Optimization of Olive Wood Biomass Energy Exploitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Østergaard, Dorte Skaarup & Svendsen, Svend, 2018. "Experience from a practical test of low-temperature district heating for space heating in five Danish single-family houses from the 1930s," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 569-578.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:252-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.