IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v11y2023i1p25-d1033247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Criteria for Partial Nationalization of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Patrícia Véras Marrone

    (Faculdade de Economia e Administração, and Escola Politécnica de Engenharia, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Fabio Rampazzo Mathias

    (Electrical Engineering, Escola Politécnica de Engenharia, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Wanderley Marques Bernardo

    (Medicine School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil)

  • Marina Feliciano Orlandini

    (Santos Medical Sciences Faculty, Centro Universitário Lusíada, UNILUS, Santos 11015-300, SP, Brazil)

  • Maria Carolina Andrade Serafim

    (Santos Medical Sciences Faculty, Centro Universitário Lusíada, UNILUS, Santos 11015-300, SP, Brazil)

  • Maria Lídia Rebello Pinho Dias Scoton

    (Electrical Engineering, Escola Politécnica de Engenharia, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Juliano Marçal Lopes

    (Electrical Engineering, Escola Politécnica de Engenharia, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Sérgio Luiz Pereira

    (Electrical Engineering, Escola Politécnica de Engenharia, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Eduardo Mario Dias

    (Electrical Engineering, Escola Politécnica de Engenharia, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

(1) Background: Any disturbance in the pharmaceutical supply chain (PSC) can disrupt the supply of medicines and affect the efficiency of health systems. Due to shortages in the global pharma supply chain over the past few years and the complex nature of free trade and its limitations when confronted by a major global health and humanitarian crisis, many countries have taken steps to mitigate the risks of disruption, including, for example, recommending the adoption of a plus one diversification approach, increasing safety stock, and nationalizing the medical supply chains. (2) Objective: To scope findings in the academic literature related to decision criteria to guide national policy decisions for the “Partial Nationalization of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain” (PNPSC) from the viewpoints of the three main stakeholders: industry, payers (government and health insurance), and patients. (3) Methods: These consist of a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature. (4) Results: A total of 115 studies were included. For local manufacturing decisions, five criteria and 15 sub-criteria were identified. Weighting, decision-making, risk assessment, and forecasting were the main data analysis tools applied; (5) Conclusions: The findings could serve as a baseline for constructing PNPSC frameworks after careful adaptation to the local context.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrícia Véras Marrone & Fabio Rampazzo Mathias & Wanderley Marques Bernardo & Marina Feliciano Orlandini & Maria Carolina Andrade Serafim & Maria Lídia Rebello Pinho Dias Scoton & Juliano Marçal Lope, 2023. "Decision Criteria for Partial Nationalization of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: A Scoping Review," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:25-:d:1033247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/1/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/1/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelanski, Howard A & Klein, Peter G, 1995. "Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 335-361, October.
    2. Varun Mahajan & D. K. Nauriyal & S. P. Singh, 2020. "Domestic market competitiveness of Indian drug and pharmaceutical industry," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 519-559, June.
    3. De Pinho Campos, Katia & Norman, Cameron D. & Jadad, Alejandro R., 2011. "Product development public–private partnerships for public health: A systematic review using qualitative data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 986-994.
    4. Rodrigo Refoios Camejo & Clare McGrath & Marisa Miraldo & Frans Rutten, 2014. "Erratum to: Distribution of health-related social surplus in pharmaceuticals: an estimation of consumer and producer surplus in the management of high blood lipids and COPD," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(4), pages 447-447, May.
    5. Rodrigo Camejo & Clare McGrath & Marisa Miraldo & Frans Rutten, 2014. "Distribution of health-related social surplus in pharmaceuticals: an estimation of consumer and producer surplus in the management of high blood lipids and COPD," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(4), pages 439-445, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beth Woods & Aimée Fox & Mark Sculpher & Karl Claxton, 2021. "Estimating the shares of the value of branded pharmaceuticals accruing to manufacturers and to patients served by health systems," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2649-2666, November.
    2. Yoonkyo Cho & Taehwan Kim & Jaewhak Roh, 2021. "An analysis of the effects of electronic commerce on the Korean economy using the CGE model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 831-854, September.
    3. Hideshi Itoh, 2006. "The Theories of International Outsourcing and Integration : A Theoretical Overview from the Perspective of Organizational Economics," Microeconomics Working Papers 21891, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    4. Wolfgang Burr, 2003. "Fundierung von Leistungstiefenentscheidungen auf der Basis modifizierter Transaktionskostenansätze," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 112-134, March.
    5. Mayer, Kyle J. & Teece, David J., 2008. "Unpacking strategic alliances: The structure and purpose of alliance versus supplier relationships," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 106-127, April.
    6. Scemama, Pierre & Levrel, Harold, 2019. "Influence of the Organization of Actors in the Ecological Outcomes of Investment in Restoration of Biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 71-79.
    7. Temin, Peter & Maxwell, James, 2003. "Corporate contracting for health care," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 403-420, November.
    8. Berry, David, 2002. "The market for tradable renewable energy credits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 369-379, September.
    9. Nicolai J. Foss, 2002. "The Strategy and Transaction Cost Nexus Past Debates, Central Questions, and Future Research Possibilities," DRUID Working Papers 02-04, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Herrera, Paul A. & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido & Espinel, Ramon L., 2005. "A Generic Four-step Methodology For Institutional Analysis," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24542, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Yi-Chi Hsiao & Hsueh-Liang Wu & Chun-Ping Yeh, 2023. "An investigation of the bridging interface strategies used by Chinese MNE when undertaking FDI to Taiwan," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1485-1512, September.
    12. Hermano, Víctor & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2013. "How to Deliver Foreign Aid? The Case of Projects Governed by the Spanish International Agency," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 298-314.
    13. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    14. Künneke, Rolf & Groenewegen, John & Ménard, Claude, 2010. "Aligning modes of organization with technology: Critical transactions in the reform of infrastructures," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 494-505, September.
    15. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    16. Per L. Bylund, 2015. "Signifying Williamson's Contribution to the Transaction Cost Approach: An Agent-Based Simulation of Coasean Transaction Costs and Specialization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 148-174, January.
    17. Wagner, Stefan, 2006. "Make-or-Buy Decisions in Patent Related Services," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 1264, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    18. Nolden, Colin & Sorrell, Steve & Polzin, Friedemann, 2016. "Catalysing the energy service market: The role of intermediaries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 420-430.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3068 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Nishant Dass & Jayant R. Kale & Vikram Nanda, 2015. "Trade Credit, Relationship-specific Investment, and Product Market Power," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 19(5), pages 1867-1923.
    21. Wong, Wai Peng & Sinnandavar, Chandra Mohan & Soh, Keng-Lin, 2021. "The relationship between supply environment, supply chain integration and operational performance: The role of business process in curbing opportunistic behaviour," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:25-:d:1033247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.