IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i12p646-d464507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Typical Farm Approach and Its Application by the Agri Benchmark Network

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Chibanda

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Katrin Agethen

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Claus Deblitz

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Yelto Zimmer

    (Global Networks, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Mohamad. I. Almadani

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Hildegard Garming

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Christa Rohlmann

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Johan Schütte

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Petra Thobe

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Mandes Verhaagh

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Lena Behrendt

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Daniel.T. Staub

    (Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Bundesallee 63, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Tobias Lasner

    (Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Herwigstraße 31, 27572 Bremerhaven, Germany)

Abstract

Global agricultural production is dynamic and complex as various factors impact it. Understanding global agricultural production systems and farmers’ decisions requires an internationally standardized and scientifically sound approach. The agri benchmark Network is a global, non-profit network of producers and agricultural experts which aims to analyze and understand the key drivers of current and future trends and developments in global agriculture. The Network combines its in-depth knowledge of production systems with its expertise in analyzing international commodity markets and value chains to provide scientifically sound advice to policymakers, producers and agribusinesses. This paper details the agri benchmark Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), which is the step-by-step method of establishing typical farm information and quantifying their data. The paper also illustrates how the typical farm approach is applied by the agri benchmark Network to analyze and understand global agriculture, production systems and adaptation strategies. The paper provides examples of how the Network applies the approach in analyzing the status-quo of production systems, benchmarking, practice change analysis and policy analysis. The paper concludes that although the typical farm approach and the institutional settings ( agri benchmark ) present some limitations, the approach and the Network provide comprehensive, consistent and coherent data on farm economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Chibanda & Katrin Agethen & Claus Deblitz & Yelto Zimmer & Mohamad. I. Almadani & Hildegard Garming & Christa Rohlmann & Johan Schütte & Petra Thobe & Mandes Verhaagh & Lena Behrendt & Daniel.T., 2020. "The Typical Farm Approach and Its Application by the Agri Benchmark Network," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:12:p:646-:d:464507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/12/646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/12/646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verhaagh, Mandes & Deblitz, Claus, 2019. "Wirtschaftlichkeit der Alternativen zur betäubungslosen Ferkelkastration - Aktualisierung und Erweiterung der betriebswirtschaftlichen Berechnungen," Thünen Working Papers 110, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Manning H. Becker, 1963. "Discussion: Representative Farms—Guides for Decision Making?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(5), pages 1455-1457.
    3. J. A. Seagraves, 1963. "Discussion: Representative Farms for Policy and Projection Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(5), pages 1465-1468.
    4. Deblitz, Claus, 2010. "agri benchmark: Benchmarking Beef Farming Systems Worldwide," 2010 Conference (54th), February 10-12, 2010, Adelaide, Australia 59096, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Bergigui, Fouad, 2011. "Contribution To The Assessment Of Climate Change Vulnerabilities In The Livestock Sector In North Africa, The Case Of Morocco," 2011 Conference: Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture, December 6-7, 2011, Rabat, Morocco 188424, Moroccan Association of Agricultural Economics (AMAEco).
    6. Searchinger, Timothy & Heimlich, Ralph & Houghton, R. A. & Dong, Fengxia & Elobeid, Amani & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Tokgoz, Simla & Hayes, Dermot J. & Yu, Hun-Hsiang, 2008. "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12881, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Feuz, Dillon M. & Skold, Melvin D., 1990. "Typical Farm Theory in Agricultural Research," Economics Staff Papers 232175, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Hoffman, Willem & Kleynhans, Theo E., 2011. "Farm Modelling for Interactive Multidisciplinary Planning of Small Grain Production Systems in the Western Cape, South Africa," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 101640, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Kevin Kress & Mandes Verhaagh, 2019. "The Economic Impact of German Pig Carcass Pricing Systems and Risk Scenarios for Boar Taint on the Profitability of Pork Production with Immunocastrates and Boars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Krug, Janina, 2013. "Perspektiven ackerbaulicher Grenzstandorte in Nordostdeutschland – Übertragbarkeit extensiver Produktionssysteme überseeischer Trockenstandorte," Thünen Report 180234, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    11. J. C. Gilson, 1963. "Discussion: Use of Representative Farms in Studies of Interregional Competition and Production Response," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(5), pages 1445-1447.
    12. S. A. Engene, 1951. "Getting Research Data by Group Conference," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(4_Part_2), pages 847-852.
    13. Harold O. Carter, 1963. "Representative Farms—Guides for Decision Making?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(5), pages 1448-1455.
    14. Stephen Langrell & Pavel Ciaian & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2012. "Sustainability and Production Costs in the Global Farming Sector: Comparative Analysis and Methodologies," JRC Research Reports JRC70116, Joint Research Centre.
    15. James S. Plaxico & Luther G. Tweenten, 1963. "Representative Farms for Policy and Projection Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(5), pages 1458-1465.
    16. Tiago T.S. Siqueira & Michel Duru, 2016. "Economics and environmental performance issues of a typical Amazonian beef farm: a case study," Post-Print hal-01301283, HAL.
    17. Miller, Thomas Alan, 1967. "Aggregation error in representative farm linear programming supply estimates," ISU General Staff Papers 196701010800004953, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Verhaagh, Mandes & Deblitz, Claus, 2019. "Wirtschaftlichkeit der Alternativen zur betäubungslo-sen Ferkelkastration – Aktualisierung und Erweite-rung der betriebswirtschaftlichen Berechnungen," Thünen Working Paper 287200, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    19. Lee M. Day, 1963. "Use of Representative Farms in Studies of Interregional Competition and Production Response," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(5), pages 1438-1445.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2021. "Investigating Alternative Poultry Trade Policies in the Context of African Countries: Evidence from Ghana," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315173, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Chibanda, Craig & Almadani, Mohamad Isam & Thobe, Petra & Wieck, Christine, 2022. "Broiler production systems in Ghana: economics and the impact of frozen chicken imports," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(4), September.
    3. Omid Zamani & Craig Chibanda & Janine Pelikan, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of import bans on domestic poultry production: a case study of Senegal," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Alicia Ramírez-Orellana & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Alfonso Rojo-Ramírez & John E. Burgos-Burgos, 2021. "The Ecuadorian Banana Farms Managers’ Perceptions: Innovation as a Driver of Environmental Sustainability Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Eva Winter & Christian Grovermann & Stefano Orsini & Francesco Solfanelli & Joachim Aurbacher, 2021. "The Effects of Interventions Targeting Increased Organic Seed Use—The Cases of Perennial Ryegrass in England and Durum Wheat in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Chibanda, Craig & Thobe, Petra & Almadani, Mohamad Isam & Deblitz, Claus & Awuni, Stephen, 2022. "Why did the chicken cross the border? Assessing farm performance of broiler production in Ghana and Germany," Conference papers 333506, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2020. "Tariff Escalation and Import Bans in the Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and West Africa," Conference papers 333239, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Pelikan, Janine & Boimah, Mavis & Chibanda, Craig & Deblitz, Claus & Gunarathne, Anoma & Almadani, Isam Mohamad & Schott, Johanna & Thobe, Petra & Weible, Daniela & Zamani, Omid, 2022. "European Exports of Poultry and Milk Products to Ghana and Senegal: A Blessing or a Curse?," Conference papers 333432, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chibanda, Craig & Almadani, Mohamad Isam & Thobe, Petra & Wieck, Christine, 2022. "Broiler production systems in Ghana: economics and the impact of frozen chicken imports," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(4), September.
    2. Kevin Kress & Sam Millet & Étienne Labussière & Ulrike Weiler & Volker Stefanski, 2019. "Sustainability of Pork Production with Immunocastration in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Feuz, Dillon M. & Skold, Melvin D., 1990. "Typical Farm Theory in Agricultural Research," Economics Staff Papers 232175, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Omid Zamani & Craig Chibanda & Janine Pelikan, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of import bans on domestic poultry production: a case study of Senegal," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Miller, Thomas Alan, 1967. "Aggregation error in representative farm linear programming supply estimates," ISU General Staff Papers 196701010800004953, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Grunenberg, Michael & Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2019. "Communicational and lobbying power in German farm animal welfare politics," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2019-01, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    7. Kevin Kress & Mandes Verhaagh, 2019. "The Economic Impact of German Pig Carcass Pricing Systems and Risk Scenarios for Boar Taint on the Profitability of Pork Production with Immunocastrates and Boars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    9. Tonini, Davide & Vadenbo, Carl & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard, 2017. "Priority of domestic biomass resources for energy: Importance of national environmental targets in a climate perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-309.
    10. Lotze-Campen, Hermann & von Witzke, Harald & Noleppa, Steffen & Schwarz, Gerald, 2015. "Science for food, climate protection and welfare: An economic analysis of plant breeding research in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 79-84.
    11. Iriarte, Alfredo & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2012. "Transition towards a more environmentally sustainable biodiesel in South America: The case of Chile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 263-273.
    12. Kriegler, Elmar, 2011. "Comment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 594-596, July.
    13. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2021. "Investigating Alternative Poultry Trade Policies in the Context of African Countries: Evidence from Ghana," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315173, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Proost, Stef & Van Dender, Kurt, 2012. "Energy and environment challenges in the transport sector," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 77-87.
    15. repec:fpr:ifprib:2012ghienglish is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Canabarro, N.I. & Silva-Ortiz, P. & Nogueira, L.A.H. & Cantarella, H. & Maciel-Filho, R. & Souza, G.M., 2023. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol and biodiesel production in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Guatemala," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Baral, Nabin & Rabotyagov, Sergey, 2017. "How much are wood-based cellulosic biofuels worth in the Pacific Northwest? Ex-ante and ex-post analysis of local people's willingness to pay," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 99-106.
    18. Baka, Jennifer & Roland-Holst, David, 2009. "Food or fuel? What European farmers can contribute to Europe's transport energy requirements and the Doha Round," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2505-2513, July.
    19. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Hermansen, John E. & Mogensen, Lisbeth, 2010. "Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2561-2571, May.
    20. Sarah Jansen & William Foster & Gustavo Anríquez & Jorge Ortega, 2021. "Understanding Farm-Level Incentives within the Bioeconomy Framework: Prices, Product Quality, Losses, and Bio-Based Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    21. Shortall, O.K., 2013. "“Marginal land” for energy crops: Exploring definitions and embedded assumptions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 19-27.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:12:p:646-:d:464507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.