IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v249y2022ics0925527322000962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scenario-based experimental study of buyer supplier relationship commitment in the context of a psychological contract breach: Implications for supply chain management

Author

Listed:
  • Aslam, Haris
  • Wanke, Peter
  • Khalid, Amna
  • Roubaud, David
  • Waseem, Maimoona
  • Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose
  • Grebinevych, Oksana
  • Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz

Abstract

Mutually beneficial long-term relationships between supply chain partners are the key to supply chain performance. However, these relationships may sometimes be undermined due to unforeseen events (e.g., supply chain disruptions). This study aims to originally examine the buyer-supplier relationship (BSR) commitment if the buyer's psychological contract is breached by the supplier. The study originally examines the effect of supplier-induced disruptions over a new product development project on the buyer's relationship commitment. It also evaluates the impact of the repair strategies employed by the supplier on the commitment to repair. These relationships are examined on two levels. First is the case where the buyer's focal manager has a cooperative or confrontational relationship with the supplier's focal manager. Second is the case where a prior (i.e., pre-disruption) relationship between the buyer and the supplier was collaborative or adversarial. We studied the research model using experimental methods on a sample of 204 supply chain managers from Pakistani industries. The results of this study show that the initial interpersonal and interorganizational relationships affected the response of the buyer when its psychological contract with the supplier was breached. The repair strategy of financial compensation is shown to have a considerable influence on repairing the commitment level of the buyer.

Suggested Citation

  • Aslam, Haris & Wanke, Peter & Khalid, Amna & Roubaud, David & Waseem, Maimoona & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Grebinevych, Oksana & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz, 2022. "A scenario-based experimental study of buyer supplier relationship commitment in the context of a psychological contract breach: Implications for supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:249:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322000962
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527322000962
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amoako-Gyampah, Kwasi & Boakye, Kwabena Gyasi & Adaku, Ebenezer & Famiyeh, Samuel, 2019. "Supplier relationship management and firm performance in developing economies: A moderated mediation analysis of flexibility capability and ownership structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 160-170.
    2. David C. Thomas & Elizabeth C. Ravlin & Yuan Liao & Daniel L. Morrell & Kevin Au, 2016. "Collectivist Values, Exchange Ideology and Psychological Contract Preference," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 255-281, April.
    3. Niels J. Pulles & Raymond P.A. Loohuis, 2020. "Managing Buyer‐Supplier Conflicts: The Effect of Buyer Openness And Directness On A Supplier's Willingness to Adapt," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 65-81, October.
    4. Omar R. Malik & Masaaki Kotabe, 2009. "Dynamic Capabilities, Government Policies, and Performance in Firms from Emerging Economies: Evidence from India and Pakistan," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 421-450, May.
    5. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    6. Yuan, Yang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun & Collins, Brian J., 2018. "The role of trust, commitment, and learning orientation on logistic service effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 37-50.
    7. Jens Esslinger & Stephanie Eckerd & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig Carter, 2019. "Who Cares? Supplier Reactions to Buyer Claims after Psychological Contract Over‐Fulfillments," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(4), pages 98-128, October.
    8. Sangho Chae & Thomas Y. Choi & Daesik Hur, 2017. "Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment: A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 39-60, April.
    9. Dirks, Kurt T. & Kim, Peter H. & Ferrin, Donald L. & Cooper, Cecily D., 2011. "Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 87-103, March.
    10. Yoon, Jeomhong & Moon, Junyean, 2019. "The moderating effect of buyer purchasing strategy on the relationship between supplier transaction-specific investment and supplier firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 516-523.
    11. Yusoon Kim & Thomas Y. Choi, 2015. "Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious: An Expanded Buyer–Supplier Relationship Typology," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(3), pages 61-86, July.
    12. Pilling, Bruce K. & Crosby, Lawrence A. & Jackson, Donald Jr., 1994. "Relational bonds in industrial exchange: An experimental test of the transaction cost economic framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 237-251, July.
    13. Saif Mir & John A. Aloysius & Stephanie Eckerd, 2017. "Understanding Supplier Switching Behavior: The Role of Psychological Contracts in a Competitive Setting," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(3), pages 3-18, July.
    14. Ellegaard, Chris & Andersen, Poul Houman, 2015. "The process of resolving severe conflict in buyer–supplier relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 457-470.
    15. Mavondo, Felix T. & Rodrigo, Elaine M., 2001. "The effect of relationship dimensions on interpersonal and interorganizational commitment in organizations conducting business between Australia and China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 111-121, May.
    16. Stephanie Eckerd & Kenneth K. Boyer & Yinan Qi & Adam Eckerd & James A. Hill, 2016. "Supply Chain Psychological Contract Breach: An Experimental Study across National Cultures," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 68-82, July.
    17. Kurt T. Dirks & Donald L. Ferrin, 2001. "The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 450-467, August.
    18. William P. Bottom & Kevin Gibson & Steven E. Daniels & J. Keith Murnighan, 2002. "When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 497-513, October.
    19. Lutz Kaufmann & Joerg Rottenburger & Craig R. Carter & Christian Schlereth, 2018. "Bluffs, Lies, and Consequences: A Reconceptualization of Bluffing in Buyer–Supplier Negotiations," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(2), pages 49-70, April.
    20. Tsai, Kuen-Hung, 2009. "Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 765-778, June.
    21. Sambasivan, Murali & Siew-Phaik, Loke & Abidin Mohamed, Zainal & Choy Leong, Yee, 2013. "Factors influencing strategic alliance outcomes in a manufacturing supply chain: Role of alliance motives, interdependence, asset specificity and relational capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 339-351.
    22. David Boyd, 2011. "Art and Artifice in Public Apologies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 299-309, December.
    23. Rameshwar Dubey & Nezih Altay & Constantin Blome, 2019. "Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 159-177, December.
    24. Gillani, Alvina & Kutaula, Smirti & Budhwar, Pawan S., 2021. "Psychological contract breach: Unraveling the dark side of business-to-business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 631-641.
    25. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Moretto, Antonella & Luzzini, Davide & Glas, Andreas H., 2020. "Obtaining supplier commitment: antecedents and performance outcomes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saif Mir & Misty Blessley & Zach Zacharia & John Aloysius, 2022. "Mending fences in a buyer–supplier relationship: The role of justice in relationship restoration," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(3), pages 23-46, July.
    2. Stephanie P. Thomas & Monique L. Ueltschy Murfield & Jacqueline K. Eastman, 2021. "I Wasn’t Expecting That! The Relational Impact of Negotiation Strategy Expectation Violations," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 3-25, October.
    3. Julia Hartmann & Sebastian Forkmann & Sabine Benoit & Stephan C. Henneberg, 2022. "A consumer perspective on managing the consequences of chain liability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 58-89, October.
    4. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    5. Lutz Kaufmann & Moritz Schreiner & Felix Reimann, 2023. "Narratives in supplier negotiations—The interplay of narrative design elements, structural power, and outcomes," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(1), pages 66-94, January.
    6. Stephanie Eckerd & Sean Handley & Fabrice Lumineau, 2022. "Trust violations in buyer–supplier relationships: Spillovers and the contingent role of governance structures," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(3), pages 47-70, July.
    7. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Kähkönen, T. & Blomqvist, K. & Gillespie, N. & Vanhala, M., 2021. "Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 98-109.
    9. Wang, Yonggui & Zhang, Lu, 2021. "How customer entitlement influences supplier performance in B2B relationships in emerging economy? A moderated mediation model of institutional environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 689-700.
    10. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Moretto, Antonella & Luzzini, Davide & Glas, Andreas H., 2020. "Obtaining supplier commitment: antecedents and performance outcomes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    12. Ha Ta & Terry L. Esper & Kenneth Ford & Sebastian Garcia‐Dastuge, 2018. "Trustworthiness Change and Relationship Continuity after Contract Breach in Financial Supply Chains," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 42-61, October.
    13. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Moretto, Antonella & Knight, Louise, 2021. "Does relationship control hinder relationship commitment? The role of supplier performance measurement systems in construction infrastructure projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    14. Niels J. Pulles & Raymond P.A. Loohuis, 2020. "Managing Buyer‐Supplier Conflicts: The Effect of Buyer Openness And Directness On A Supplier's Willingness to Adapt," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 65-81, October.
    15. Gillani, Alvina & Kutaula, Smirti & Budhwar, Pawan S., 2021. "Psychological contract breach: Unraveling the dark side of business-to-business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 631-641.
    16. Tessa Haesevoets & Chris Reinders Folmer & Alain Van Hiel, 2015. "Is Trust for Sale? The Effectiveness of Financial Compensation for Repairing Competence- versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Rodney Thomas & Jessica L. Darby & David Dobrzykowski & Remko van Hoek, 2021. "Decomposing Social Sustainability: Signaling Theory Insights into Supplier Selection Decisions," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 117-136, October.
    18. Sung Tae Kim & Hong-Hee Lee & Taewon Hwang, 2020. "Logistics integration in the supply chain: a resource dependence theory perspective," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Alyson Byrne & Julian Barling & Kathryne Dupré, 2014. "Leader Apologies and Employee and Leader Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 91-106, April.
    20. Gasparotto, Lisiane Santos & Pacheco, Natália Araujo & Basso, Kenny & Corte, Vitor Francisco Dalla & Rabello, Gisele Costa & Gallon, Shalimar, 2018. "The role of regulation and financial compensation on trust recovery," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 10-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:249:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322000962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.