IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v219y2020icp82-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of production- versus consumption-based emission tax under demand uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Jie
  • Chen, Xi
  • Hu, Jian

Abstract

Emission tax is an instrument widely adopted by countries and regions to incentivize emission abatement by emission-intensive firms including manufacturers. However, policies differ in how they allocate emission responsibilities among stakeholders. For example, the Chile emission tax directly penalizes manufacturers for the emissions they generate during their production (production-based emission tax), whereas the Sweden electricity emission tax penalizes the consumption of electricity rather than its production (consumption-based emission tax). These two methods have potentially varying implications on manufacturers' profits, their emission abatement decisions, as well as the resulting emission levels, especially when demand uncertainty is involved. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the two distinct methods by studying a profit-maximizing manufacturer facing stochastic demand. Under either production- or consumption-based emission tax, the manufacturer's optimal decisions on its selling price, production quantity and emission abatement investment are derived. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that under either tax, it is possible for an increase in the emission tax to discourage the manufacturer from investing in emission abatement. The impact of tax rate, abatement technology efficiency, and demand uncertainty on the manufacturer's profitability and abatement decision are also studied. Interestingly, higher demand uncertainty may motivate the manufacturer to invest more in emission abatement under production-based emission tax. Using a numerical example of an electricity power generator, we offer further insights into the comparison between the two taxes and find that there exist cases for either tax to dominate the other in terms of both profit and emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Jie & Chen, Xi & Hu, Jian, 2020. "The effect of production- versus consumption-based emission tax under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 82-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:219:y:2020:i:c:p:82-98
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319301847
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank & Ecofys, "undated". "Carbon Pricing Watch 2017," World Bank Publications - Reports 26565, The World Bank Group.
    2. Erin T. Mansur, 2011. "Upstream versus Downstream Implementation of Climate Policy," NBER Chapters, in: The Design and Implementation of US Climate Policy, pages 179-193, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Khouja, Moutaz, 1999. "The single-period (news-vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 537-553, October.
    4. Anwar Shah & Bjorn Larsen, 2014. "Carbon taxes, the greenhouse effect, and developing countries," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 15(1), pages 353-402, May.
    5. Barnett, A H, 1980. "The Pigouvian Tax Rule under Monopoly," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1037-1041, December.
    6. Michael Jakob & Robert Marschinski & Michael Hübler, 2013. "Between a Rock and a Hard Place: A Trade-Theory Analysis of Leakage Under Production- and Consumption-Based Policies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 56(1), pages 47-72, September.
    7. Felipe Caro & Charles J. Corbett & Tarkan Tan & Rob Zuidwijk, 2013. "Double Counting in Supply Chain Carbon Footprinting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 545-558, October.
    8. Baumol, William J, 1972. "On Taxation and the Control of Externalities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(3), pages 307-322, June.
    9. David F. Drake & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2016. "Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 1006-1025, June.
    10. William R. Cline, 1992. "Economics of Global Warming, The," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 39, October.
    11. van Asselt, Harro & Brewer, Thomas, 2010. "Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: An analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 42-51, January.
    12. Summers, Lawrence H., 1991. "The Case for Corrective Taxation," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 44(3), pages 289-92, September.
    13. Rosič, Heidrun & Jammernegg, Werner, 2013. "The economic and environmental performance of dual sourcing: A newsvendor approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 109-119.
    14. Gérard P. Cachon, 2014. "Retail Store Density and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 1907-1925, August.
    15. Babiker, Mustafa H., 2005. "Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 421-445, March.
    16. Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Maqbool Dada, 1999. "Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 183-194, April.
    17. Boonekamp, Piet G.M., 2007. "Price elasticities, policy measures and actual developments in household energy consumption - A bottom up analysis for the Netherlands," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 133-157, March.
    18. Chen, Xi, 2018. "When does store consolidation lead to higher emissions?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 109-122.
    19. Peters, Glen P., 2008. "From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 13-23, March.
    20. Summers, Lawrence H., 1991. "The Case for Corrective Taxation," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 44(3), pages 289-292, September.
    21. Basak Kalkanci & Kay-Yut Chen & Feryal Erhun, 2011. "Contract Complexity and Performance Under Asymmetric Demand Information: An Experimental Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 689-704, April.
    22. Katsoulacos, Yannis & Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 1995. " Environmental Policy under Oligopoly with Endogenous Market Structure," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(3), pages 411-420, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiemei Yan & Tong Zhang & Zhanguo Zhu, 2023. "The Environmental Tax Scheme in China’s Large-Scale Pig Farming: Balancing Economic Burden and Responsibility," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2021. "A game theoretic approach for analyzing electric and gasoline-based vehicles’ competition in a supply chain under government sustainable strategies: A case study of South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Li, Qingying & Ma, Manqiong & Shi, Tianqin & Zhu, Chen, 2022. "Green investment in a sustainable supply chain: The role of blockchain and fairness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Rouani, Lahcene & Harkat, Mohamed Faouzi & Kouadri, Abdelmalek & Mekhilef, Saad, 2021. "Shading fault detection in a grid-connected PV system using vertices principal component analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1527-1539.
    5. Bingyue Wan & Lixin Tian & Wenbin Zhang & Guangyong Zhang, 2023. "Environmental effects of behavior growth under green development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10821-10855, October.
    6. Qingguo Bai & Jianteng Xu & Yuzhong Zhang, 2022. "The distributionally robust optimization model for a remanufacturing system under cap-and-trade policy: a newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 731-760, February.
    7. Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for car pricing and its energy efficiency level versus governmental sustainability goals by considering rebound effect: A case study of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    8. Rezgar FEIZI & Sahar AMIDI & Thais NUNEZ-ROCHA & Isabelle RABAUD, 2022. "Carbon Tax and Emissions Transfer: a Spatial Analysis," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2965, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Xi, 2018. "When does store consolidation lead to higher emissions?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 109-122.
    2. Chen, Xi & Benjaafar, Saif & Elomri, Adel, 2019. "On the effectiveness of emission penalties in decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 1155-1167.
    3. Fu, Ke & Li, Yanzhi & Mao, Huiqiang & Miao, Zhaowei, 2023. "Firms’ production and green technology strategies: The role of emission asymmetry and carbon taxes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1100-1112.
    4. Susu Cheng & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Regulatory pressure and consumer environmental awareness in a green supply chain with retailer responsibility: A dynamic analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 1133-1151, June.
    5. Dieter Schmidtchen & Jenny Helstroffer & Christian Koboldt, 2021. "Regulatory failure and the polluter pays principle: why regulatory impact assessment dominates the polluter pays principle," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 109-144, January.
    6. Larsen, Bjorn & Shah, Anwar & DEC, 1992. "World fossil fuel subsidies and global carbon emissions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1002, The World Bank.
    7. Shoufeng Ji & Dan Zhao & Xiaoshuai Peng, 2018. "Joint Decisions on Emission Reduction and Inventory Replenishment with Overconfidence and Low-Carbon Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Fang, Yuan & Yu, Yugang & Shi, Ye & Liu, Jie, 2020. "The effect of carbon tariffs on global emission control: A global supply chain model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Sakai, Marco & Barrett, John, 2016. "Border carbon adjustments: Addressing emissions embodied in trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 102-110.
    10. Shaojian Qu & Guoqing Jiang & Ying Ji & Guangming Zhang & Nabe Mohamed, 2021. "Newsvendor’s optimal decisions under stochastic demand and cap-and-trade regulation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17764-17787, December.
    11. Fei Gao & Gilvan C. Souza, 2022. "Carbon Offsetting with Eco-Conscious Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7879-7897, November.
    12. Larsen, Bjorn, 1994. "World fossil fuel subsidies and global carbon emissions in a model with interfuel substitution," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1256, The World Bank.
    13. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Wei, Xiaoya & Lin, Jun & Tian, Xin & Lev, Benjamin & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Supply chain management under carbon taxes: A review and bibliometric analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Rustico, Erica & Dimitrov, Stanko, 2022. "Environmental taxation: The impact of carbon tax policy commitment on technology choice and social welfare," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. Larsen, Bjorn & Shah, Anwar, 1994. "Global Tradeable Carbon Permits, Participation Incentives, and Transfers," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(0), pages 841-856, Supplemen.
    16. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    17. Gabriela Michalek & Reimund Schwarze, 2015. "Carbon leakage: pollution, trade or politics?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1471-1492, December.
    18. Cole, Matthew A. & Fredriksson, Per G., 2009. "Institutionalized pollution havens," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1239-1256, February.
    19. Claudia Ranocchia & Luca Lambertini, 2021. "Porter Hypothesis vs Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Can There Be Environmental Policies Getting Two Eggs in One Basket?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 177-199, January.
    20. Maia David & Bernard Sinclair-Desgagné, 2005. "Environmental Regulation and the Eco-Industry," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 141-155, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:219:y:2020:i:c:p:82-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.