IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v7y2020ics2214716019301769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus reaching with heterogeneous user preferences, private input and privacy-preservation output

Author

Listed:
  • Le Cadre, Hélène
  • Bedo, Jean-Sébastien

Abstract

This paper deals with a generic problem of matching agents with underlying preferences while guaranteeing a certain level of privacy is met. As a general framework, we consider consumers and prosumers who trade energy on a platform. Consumers buy energy to the platform to maximize their usage benefit while minimizing the cost paid to the platform. Prosumers, who have the possibility to generate energy, self-consume part of it to maximize their usage benefit and sell the rest to the platform to maximize their revenue. Inspired by a variant of the Hotelling model, product differentiation is introduced and consumers can specify preferences regarding locality and green origin of their supply. The consumers and prosumers problems being coupled through a matching probability, we provide analytical characterization of the resulting Nash equilibrium, and conditions for existence and uniqueness. Assuming supply shortages occur on the platform, we reformulate the local market clearing problem as a consensus problem that we solve using Consensus Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (C-ADMM), enabling minimal information exchanges between prosumers and consumers. C-ADMM complexity is recalled and strategyproofness is analysed. The algorithm is then run on a case study made of 300 prosumers from New South Wales in Australia, equipped with solar panels. We consider privacy-preservation output against a centralized benchmark approach, and evaluate C-ADMM computational time under three scenarios with an increasing number of agents. Regarding economic analysis, we observe that it is more profitable for prosumers than for consumers to be flexible within a local energy community, and that belonging to a local energy community incentivizes them to reduce their demands by comparison with their initial targets. Furthermore, the expectation to make a substantial profit is a main driver for prosumers’ engagement within a community; whereas for consumers, the green origin of the supply is determinant.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Cadre, Hélène & Bedo, Jean-Sébastien, 2020. "Consensus reaching with heterogeneous user preferences, private input and privacy-preservation output," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:7:y:2020:i:c:s2214716019301769
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2019.100138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716019301769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2019.100138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liran Einav & Chiara Farronato & Jonathan Levin, 2016. "Peer-to-Peer Markets," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 615-635, October.
    2. Nea, 2019. "National legislative and regulatory activities," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2018(2).
    3. Hélène Le Cadre & Ilyès Mezghani & Anthony Papavasiliou, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2996, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. ., 2019. "The national interest," Chapters, in: Global Political Economy, chapter 3, pages 32-52, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. d'Aspremont, C & Gabszewicz, Jean Jaskold & Thisse, J-F, 1979. "On Hotelling's "Stability in Competition"," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(5), pages 1145-1150, September.
    6. Hélène Le Cadre, 2019. "On the efficiency of local electricity markets under decentralized and centralized designs: a multi-leader Stackelberg game analysis," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(4), pages 953-984, December.
    7. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mezghani, Ilyès & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 317-339.
    8. Sousa, Tiago & Soares, Tiago & Pinson, Pierre & Moret, Fabio & Baroche, Thomas & Sorin, Etienne, 2019. "Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 367-378.
    9. Eduardo M. Azevedo & Jacob D. Leshno, 2016. "A Supply and Demand Framework for Two-Sided Matching Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(5), pages 1235-1268.
    10. A. Ya. Zaporozhan, 2019. "On a Question of National Projects Implementation," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 5.
    11. Hélène Le Cadre & Enrique Rivero Puente & Hanspeter Höschle, 2019. "Consensus Reaching With Heterogeneous User Preferences," Working Papers hal-01874798, HAL.
    12. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2019. "Matching supply and demand in a sharing economy: Classification, computational complexity, and application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 578-595.
    13. Smyth, Emer & Banks, Joanne & O’Sullivan, Jessica & McCoy, Selina & Redmond, Paul & McGuinness, Seamus, 2019. "Evaluation of the National Youthreach Programme," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS82, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hélène Le Cadre & Yuting Mou & Hanspeter Höschle, 2020. "Parametrized Inexact-ADMM to Span the Set of Generalized Nash Equilibria: A Normalized Equilibrium Approach," Working Papers hal-02925005, HAL.
    2. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mou, Yuting & Höschle, Hanspeter, 2022. "Parametrized Inexact-ADMM based coordination games: A normalized Nash equilibrium approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 696-716.
    3. Nima Narjabadifam & Javanshir Fouladvand & Mustafa Gül, 2023. "Critical Review on Community-Shared Solar—Advantages, Challenges, and Future Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhai, Haibo & Rubin, Edward S. & Grol, Eric J. & O'Connell, Andrew C. & Wu, Zitao & Lewis, Eric G., 2022. "Dry cooling retrofits at existing fossil fuel-fired power plants in a water-stressed region: Tradeoffs in water savings, cost, and capacity shortfalls," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    2. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Gonzalo Varela & Juan Pedro Gambetta & Federico Ganz & Andreas Eberhard & Sebastian Franco & Stefania Lovo, 2020. "Import Duties and Performance," World Bank Publications - Reports 33886, The World Bank Group.
    4. McLean, Karen & Clarke, Jessica & Scott, Dorothy & Hiscock, Harriet & Goldfeld, Sharon, 2020. "Foster and kinship carer experiences of accessing healthcare: A qualitative study of barriers, enablers and potential solutions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Le Cadre, Hélène & Jacquot, Paulin & Wan, Cheng & Alasseur, Clémence, 2020. "Peer-to-peer electricity market analysis: From variational to Generalized Nash Equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 753-771.
    6. Bonanno, Alessandro & Mendis, Sachintha S., 2021. "Too cool for farm to school? Analyzing the determinants of farm to school programming continuation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Acharya Balkrishna & Rashmi Mittal & Ashwani Kumar & Deepti Singh & Vedpriya Arya, 2020. "Analysis of policy interventions in agriculture and ICT based mechanistic approach towards sustainability: an Indian perspective," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(1), pages 194-213, June.
    8. Trotta, Gianluca, 2020. "An empirical analysis of domestic electricity load profiles: Who consumes how much and when?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    9. Nieta, Agustín A. Sánchez de la & Ilieva, Iliana & Gibescu, Madeleine & Bremdal, Bernt & Simonsen, Stig & Gramme, Eivind, 2021. "Optimal midterm peak shaving cost in an electricity management system using behind customers’ smart meter configuration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Shariat Torbaghan, Shahab & Madani, Mehdi & Sels, Peter & Virag, Ana & Le Cadre, Hélène & Kessels, Kris & Mou, Yuting, 2021. "Designing day-ahead multi-carrier markets for flexibility: Models and clearing algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. Cortade, Thomas & Poudou, Jean-Christophe, 2022. "Peer-to-peer energy platforms: Incentives for prosuming," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Martin Palovic, 2022. "Coordination of power network operators as a game-theoretical problem," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0040, Bremen Energy Research.
    13. Longxi Li, 2020. "Optimal Coordination Strategies for Load Service Entity and Community Energy Systems Based on Centralized and Decentralized Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Rojanakit, Patcharapar & Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Dulleck, Uwe, 2022. "The sharing economy: A critical review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1317-1334.
    15. Attar, Mehdi & Repo, Sami & Mann, Pierre, 2022. "Congestion management market design- Approach for the Nordics and Central Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    16. Rong, Ke & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Toward born sharing: The sharing economy evolution enabled by the digital ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Adewole, Ayooluwa & Shipworth, Michelle & Lemaire, Xavier & Sanderson, Danielle, 2023. "Peer-to-Peer energy trading, independence aspirations and financial benefits among Nigerian households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Rafal Dzikowski, 2020. "DSO–TSO Coordination of Day-Ahead Operation Planning with the Use of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    19. Wang, Zhihong & Li, Yangyang & Gu, Fu & Guo, Jianfeng & Wu, Xiaojun, 2020. "Two-sided matching and strategic selection on freight resource sharing platforms," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    20. van Leeuwen, Gijs & AlSkaif, Tarek & Gibescu, Madeleine & van Sark, Wilfried, 2020. "An integrated blockchain-based energy management platform with bilateral trading for microgrid communities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:7:y:2020:i:c:s2214716019301769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.