1. Brander, James A. & Spencer, Barbara J., 1985. "Export subsidies and international market share rivalry," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1-2), pages 83-100, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • James A. Brander & Barbara J. Spencer, 1984. "Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry," NBER Working Papers 1464, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
2. Just, Richard E & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David, 1979. "Price Controls and Optimal Export Policies under Alternative Market Structures," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 706-14, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
3. Spencer, Barbara J & Brander, James A, 1983. "International R & D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 50(4), pages 707-22, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • Barbara J. Spencer & James A. Brander, 1982. "International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy," Working Papers 518, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
   • Barbara J. Spencer & James A. Brander, 1983. "International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy," NBER Working Papers 1192, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
4. Auquier, A A & Caves, R E, 1979. "Monopolistic Export Industries, Trade Taxes, and Optimal Competition Policy," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(355), pages 559-81, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
5. Markusen, James R., 1984. "The welfare and allocative effects of export taxes versus marketing boards," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 19-36. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
6. Kala Krishna & Motoshige Itoh, 1988. "Content Protection and Oligopolistic Interactions," NBER Working Papers 1843, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • Krishna, Kala & Itoh, Motoshige, 1988. "Content Protection and Oligopolistic Interactions," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 55(1), pages 107-25, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
7. Martin K. Perry, 1982. "Oligopoly and Consistent Conjectural Variations," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(1), pages 197-205, Spring. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

1. Kala Krishna, 1995. "The Adding Up Problem: A Targeting Approach," NBER Working Papers 4999, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • Krishna, K., 1993. "The Adding Up Problem: A Tergeting Approach," Papers 10-93-33, Pennsylvania State - Department of Economics.
2. Jagdish Bhagwati, 1989. "Is free trade passé after all?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 17-44, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
3. Kala Krishna & Kathleen Hogan & Phillip Swagel, 1989. "The Non-Optimality of Optimal Trade Policy: The U.S. Automobile Indust ry Revisited, 1979-1985," NBER Working Papers 3118, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
4. Praveen Kujal & Juan Ruiz, 2003. "International Trade Policy towards Monopolies and Oligopolies," International Trade 0302002, EconWPA, revised 17 Mar 2003. [Downloadable!]
5. Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1989. "The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Battles for Monopoly," Discussion Papers 868, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Bagwell, K. & Staiger, R.W., 1990. "The Sensitivity Of Strategic And Corrective R & D Policy In Battles For Monopoly," Papers e-90-2, Stanford - Hoover Institution.
   • Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1990. "The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Battles for Monopoly," NBER Working Papers 3235, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   • Bagwell, Kyle & Staiger, Robert W, 1992. "The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Battles for Monopoly," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 33(4), pages 795-816, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
6. Desquilbet, Marion & Guyomard, Herve, 1999. "Public Policy In Vertically Related Markets: A Cournot Oligopoly-Oligopsony Model," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21561, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]
7. Arnaud Costinot, 2008. "A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Agreements on Product Standards," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series 2008-05, Department of Economics, UC San Diego. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Costinot, Arnaud, 2008. "A comparative institutional analysis of agreements on product standards," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 197-213, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
8. Winston Chang & Hajime Sugeta, 2005. "Cost asymmetry, oligopolistic competition and optimal trade and industrial policies," International Economic Journal, Korean International Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 95-114, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)