IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v235y2021ics0360544221016741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic natural gas storage coordination among EU member states in response to disruption in the trans Austria gas pipeline: A stochastic approach to solidarity

Author

Listed:
  • Sesini, Marzia
  • Giarola, Sara
  • Hawkes, Adam D.

Abstract

The 2019 EU energy security agenda has led to the concept of solidarity: a coordinated response of Member States to “high-impact, low-probability” events jeopardizing the EU energy supply. At the core of this paper is a modeling analysis of storage as a non-market-based solidarity measure (the so-called strategic storage) considering whether it could be economically desirable to secure gas supply in case of disruption to the EU network. A two-stage stochastic cost minimization gas transport model was developed to study the short-term resilience of the network to supply shocks, such as a natural gas pipeline rupture, and the cost effective system response, in terms of transmission of gas flows, capacity use, and storage utilization in an interconnected gas system, taken the EU as a reference. Relative to a base scenario with no strategic storage, results show that gas import loss up to 80% on multiple different pipelines could lead to a +76% in total costs when no coordinated strategic storage is in place, compared with a −30% in total cost and a −60% in liquefied natural gas cost, when in use, emphasizing the cost-effectiveness achieved with strategic storage in securing energy to the system in emergency.

Suggested Citation

  • Sesini, Marzia & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2021. "Strategic natural gas storage coordination among EU member states in response to disruption in the trans Austria gas pipeline: A stochastic approach to solidarity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:235:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221016741
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221016741
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seyed Mohammad Khalili & Fariborz Jolai & Seyed Ali Torabi, 2017. "Integrated production–distribution planning in two-echelon systems: a resilience view," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 1040-1064, February.
    2. Hauser, Philipp & Heinrichs, Heidi U. & Gillessen, Bastian & Müller, Theresa, 2018. "Implications of diversification strategies in the European natural gas market for the German energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 442-454.
    3. Yassine Rqiq & Jesus Beyza & Jose M. Yusta & Ricardo Bolado-Lavin, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Investments in Cross-Border Pipelines on the Security of Gas Supply in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Lochner, Stefan & Dieckhöner, Caroline, 2012. "Civil unrest in North Africa—Risks for natural gas supply?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 167-175.
    5. Pami Aalto & Dicle Korkmaz Temel, 2014. "European Energy Security: Natural Gas and the Integration Process," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 758-774, July.
    6. Månsson, André & Johansson, Bengt & Nilsson, Lars J., 2014. "Assessing energy security: An overview of commonly used methodologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Dixit, Vijaya & Verma, Priyanka & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, 2020. "Assessment of pre and post-disaster supply chain resilience based on network structural parameters with CVaR as a risk measure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Hombach, Laura Elisabeth & Büsing, Christina & Walther, Grit, 2018. "Robust and sustainable supply chains under market uncertainties and different risk attitudes – A case study of the German biodiesel market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 302-312.
    9. Sesini, Marzia & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2020. "The impact of liquefied natural gas and storage on the EU natural gas infrastructure resilience," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. Eser, P. & Chokani, N. & Abhari, R., 2019. "Impact of Nord Stream 2 and LNG on gas trade and security of supply in the European gas network of 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 816-830.
    11. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2013. "An international assessment of energy security performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 148-158.
    12. Mark Turnquist & Eric Vugrin, 2013. "Design for resilience in infrastructure distribution networks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 104-120, March.
    13. Saghaei, Mahsa & Ghaderi, Hadi & Soleimani, Hamed, 2020. "Design and optimization of biomass electricity supply chain with uncertainty in material quality, availability and market demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Skea, Jim & Chaudry, Modassar & Wang, Xinxin, 2012. "The role of gas infrastructure in promoting UK energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 202-213.
    15. Vivoda, Vlado, 2010. "Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5258-5263, September.
    16. Hughes, Larry, 2012. "A generic framework for the description and analysis of energy security in an energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 221-231.
    17. Jafar Namdar & Xueping Li & Rupy Sawhney & Ninad Pradhan, 2018. "Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 2339-2360, March.
    18. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    19. Suvrajeet Sen & Julia L. Higle, 1999. "An Introductory Tutorial on Stochastic Linear Programming Models," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 33-61, April.
    20. Marte Fodstad, Ruud Egging, Kjetil Midthun, and Asgeir Tomasgard, 2016. "Stochastic Modeling of Natural Gas Infrastructure Development in Europe under Demand Uncertainty," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Sustainab).
    21. Peter Lustenberger & Felix Schumacher & Matteo Spada & Peter Burgherr & Bozidar Stojadinovic, 2019. "Assessing the Performance of the European Natural Gas Network for Selected Supply Disruption Scenarios Using Open-Source Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    22. Rodríguez-Gómez, Nuria & Zaccarelli, Nicola & Bolado-Lavín, Ricardo, 2016. "European ability to cope with a gas crisis. Comparison between 2009 and 2014," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 461-474.
    23. Yu, Weichao & Song, Shangfei & Li, Yichen & Min, Yuan & Huang, Weihe & Wen, Kai & Gong, Jing, 2018. "Gas supply reliability assessment of natural gas transmission pipeline systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 853-870.
    24. Francesca Maggioni & Florian A. Potra & Marida Bertocchi, 2017. "A scenario-based framework for supply planning under uncertainty: stochastic programming versus robust optimization approaches," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 5-44, January.
    25. Ghelichi, Zabih & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "A stochastic programming approach toward optimal design and planning of an integrated green biodiesel supply chain network under uncertainty: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 661-687.
    26. Lawrence V. Snyder & Zümbül Atan & Peng Peng & Ying Rong & Amanda J. Schmitt & Burcu Sinsoysal, 2016. "OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 89-109, February.
    27. Torabi, S.A. & Baghersad, M. & Mansouri, S.A., 2015. "Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 22-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sesini, Marzia & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2022. "Solidarity measures: Assessment of strategic gas storage on EU regional risk groups natural gas supply resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Miao, Cairan & Wang, Qi & Tang, Yi, 2023. "A gas-thermal inertia-based frequency response strategy considering the suppression of a second frequency dip in an integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Kotek, Péter & Selei, Adrienn & Takácsné Tóth, Borbála & Felsmann, Balázs, 2023. "What can the EU do to address the high natural gas prices?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Wang, Qi & Miao, Cairan & Tang, Yi, 2022. "Power shortage support strategies considering unified gas-thermal inertia in an integrated energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    5. Qian, Lanping & Bai, Yang & Wang, Wenya & Meng, Fanyi & Chen, Zhisong, 2023. "Natural gas crisis, system resilience and emergency responses: A China case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    6. Xie, Minghua & Wei, Xiaonan & Chen, Chuanglian & Sun, Chuanwang, 2022. "China's natural gas production peak and energy return on investment (EROI): From the perspective of energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Cabrales, Sergio & Valencia, Carlos & Ramírez, Carlos & Ramírez, Andrés & Herrera, Juan & Cadena, Angela, 2022. "Stochastic cost-benefit analysis to assess new infrastructure to improve the reliability of the natural gas supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sesini, Marzia & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2022. "Solidarity measures: Assessment of strategic gas storage on EU regional risk groups natural gas supply resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Cheramin, Meysam & Saha, Apurba Kumar & Cheng, Jianqiang & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Jin, Hongyue, 2021. "Resilient NdFeB magnet recycling under the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic: Stochastic programming and Benders decomposition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Aghajani, Mojtaba & Ali Torabi, S. & Altay, Nezih, 2023. "Resilient relief supply planning using an integrated procurement-warehousing model under supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    6. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2021. "On the risk-averse selection of resilient multi-tier supply portfolio," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    8. Ang, B.W. & Choong, W.L. & Ng, T.S., 2015. "Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1077-1093.
    9. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    10. Zeng, Shouzhen & Streimikiene, Dalia & Baležentis, Tomas, 2017. "Review of and comparative assessment of energy security in Baltic States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-192.
    11. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    12. Ghanei, Shima & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic collaborative intertwined supply network design problem under multiple disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2022. "Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Tete, Komlan H.S. & Soro, Y.M. & Sidibé, S.S. & Jones, Rory V., 2023. "Assessing energy security within the electricity sector in the West African economic and monetary union: Inter-country performances and trends analysis with policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Hughes, Larry & Ranjan, Ashish, 2013. "Event-related stresses in energy systems and their effects on energy security," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 413-421.
    16. Herie Park & Sungwoo Bae, 2021. "Quantitative Assessment of Energy Supply Security: Korea Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Ranjan, Ashish & Hughes, Larry, 2014. "Energy security and the diversity of energy flows in an energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 137-144.
    18. Sesini, Marzia & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2020. "The impact of liquefied natural gas and storage on the EU natural gas infrastructure resilience," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    19. Laldjebaev, Murodbek & Morreale, Stephen J. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Kassam, Karim-Aly S., 2018. "Rethinking energy security and services in practice: National vulnerability and three energy pathways in Tajikistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 39-50.
    20. Gong, Xu & Wang, You & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Assessing dynamic China’s energy security: Based on functional data analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:235:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221016741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.