IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v119y2020ics0190740920313049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaemia among Indian children: A study of prevalence and associated factors among 5–9 years old

Author

Listed:
  • Rahman, Mohammad Hifz Ur
  • Chauhan, Shekhar
  • Patel, Ratna
  • Boro, Bandita
  • Anwar, Tarique
  • Kumar, Pradeep
  • Muhammad, T.
  • Srivastava, Shobhit

Abstract

Despite a plethora of research on anaemia among children in India and worldwide, progress has been snail-paced. Most of the studies in India related to anaemia among children are related to children aged 6–59 months. Therefore, this study intends to examine anaemia among children aged 5–9 years of age using a recent nationally representative sample survey ‘Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS).’ CNNS is a cross-sectional, household face to face survey. The total sample size for this study was 14,664 children who had anaemia. Anaemia among children aged 5–9 was the outcome variable for this study. The anemia level among children was categorized as 1 if haemoglobin level less than 11.5 g/dl (anemic) and 0 otherwise. The explanatory variables were categorized into three groups indicating children's characteristics, maternal characteristics, and household’s characteristics. The binary logistic regression analysis had been performed to find out the predictors of anaemia among children aged 5–9 years in India. Nearly one-fourth (23.1%) and one-fifth (21.1%) of the children with low level of Vitamin A and Vitamin B12 were anaemic.. Nearly one-fourth of the children (23.5) aged 5–9 years in India had anaemia The prevalence of anaemia among children was as low as 3.1 percent in Kerala and as high as 41.1 percent in Tripura. The results confirmed that a low level of folate, zinc, and vitamin A were associated with a high level of anaemia among children. Higher mother’s education status was accompanied by a low level of anaemia among children. The alarming level of anaemia among children calls for immediate attention in terms of detailed study of risk factors, effective policy, and timely intervention. Anaemia among children aged 5–9 years requires investments in mother’s education and socioeconomic status along with improvements in micronutrient intake and overall nutritional wellbeing of the children.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahman, Mohammad Hifz Ur & Chauhan, Shekhar & Patel, Ratna & Boro, Bandita & Anwar, Tarique & Kumar, Pradeep & Muhammad, T. & Srivastava, Shobhit, 2020. "Anaemia among Indian children: A study of prevalence and associated factors among 5–9 years old," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920313049
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920313049
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janet Currie & Enrico Moretti, 2003. "Mother's Education and the Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital: Evidence from College Openings," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1495-1532.
    2. Angus Deaton and Jean Drèze & Jean Drèze, 2002. "Poverty and Inequality in India: A Reexamination," Working papers 107, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    3. Satvika Chalasani & Shea Rutstein, 2014. "Household wealth and child health in India," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(1), pages 15-41, March.
    4. repec:pri:rpdevs:deaton_dreze_poverty_india is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghosh, Pritam, 2023. "Determinants and transition of anaemia among under-five children from different social groups in India from 2005–06 to 2015-16," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnaud Chevalier & Colm Harmon & Vincent O’ Sullivan & Ian Walker, 2013. "The impact of parental income and education on the schooling of their children," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Jungho Kim, 2023. "Female education and its impact on fertility," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 228-228, May.
    3. K.L. Datta, 2006. "The Debate on the Poverty Estimates of 1999–2000," Development Economics Working Papers 22150, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    4. Lucas Chancel & Thomas Piketty, 2019. "Indian Income Inequality, 1922‐2015: From British Raj to Billionaire Raj?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(S1), pages 33-62, November.
    5. John C. Bluedorn & Elizabeth U. Cascio, 2005. "Education and Intergenerational Mobility: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Purerto Rico," Economics Papers 2005-W21, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    6. Angus Deaton & Jean Dreze, 2008. "Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations," Working Papers 1071, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    7. Meng, Xin & Zhao, Guochang, 2021. "The long shadow of a large scale education interruption: The intergenerational effect," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Okada, Keisuke, 2012. "The effects of female HIV/AIDS status on fertility and child health in Cambodia," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 560-570.
    9. Ural Marchand, Beyza, 2012. "Tariff pass-through and the distributional effects of trade liberalization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 265-281.
    10. de Walque, Damien, 2007. "How does the impact of an HIV/AIDS information campaign vary with educational attainment? Evidence from rural Uganda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 686-714, November.
    11. Patrick Lehnert & Madison Dell & Uschi Backes-Gellner & Eric Bettinger, 2024. "The Effect of Postsecondary Educational Institutions on Local Economies: A Bird's-Eye View," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0210, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    12. Amin, Vikesh & Lundborg, Petter & Rooth, Dan-Olof, 2015. "The intergenerational transmission of schooling: Are mothers really less important than fathers?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 100-117.
    13. Martin Schlotter & Guido Schwerdt & Ludger Woessmann, 2011. "Econometric methods for causal evaluation of education policies and practices: a non-technical guide," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 109-137.
    14. Hope Corman & Dhaval Dave & Nancy E. Reichman, 2018. "Evolution of the Infant Health Production Function," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(1), pages 6-47, July.
    15. Fabian Kosse & Thomas Deckers & Pia Pinger & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Armin Falk, 2020. "The Formation of Prosociality: Causal Evidence on the Role of Social Environment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(2), pages 434-467.
    16. Scott Carrell & Bruce Sacerdote, 2017. "Why Do College-Going Interventions Work?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 124-151, July.
    17. Arvind Panagariya & Megha Mukim, 2014. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Poverty in India," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 31(1), pages 1-52, March.
    18. Bratti, Massimiliano & Mendola, Mariapia, 2014. "Parental health and child schooling," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 94-108.
    19. repec:pri:crcwel:wp11-12-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    20. van Elk, Roel & van der Steeg, Marc & Webbink, Dinand, 2011. "Does the timing of tracking affect higher education completion?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 1009-1021, October.
    21. Sonia Bhalotra & Abhishek Chakravarty & Dilip Mookherjee & Francisco J. Pino, 2019. "Property Rights and Gender Bias: Evidence from Land Reform in West Bengal," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 205-237, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920313049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.