IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v239y2019icp1226-1241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenario generation and probabilistic forecasting analysis of spatio-temporal wind speed series with multivariate autoregressive volatility models

Author

Listed:
  • Lucheroni, Carlo
  • Boland, John
  • Ragno, Costantino

Abstract

This paper evaluates the application of a family of VAR-mGARCH (Vector AutoRegressive with multivariate AutoRegressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) volatility models to the problem of modeling (i.e. generating correct in-sample scenarios) and forecasting in a probabilistic way three univariate but mutually dependent wind speed hourly series. The evaluation starts from the consideration that optimal modeling and optimal forecasting are not necessarily attained by the same models, and that they are assessed in different ways. The proposed VAR-mGARCH family, originated in Finance, consists of the VAR-BEKK (VAR - Baba, Engle, Kraft and Kroner) model and the VAR-DCC (VAR - Dynamic Conditional Correlation) model, the latter seen as the simplified and more scalable version of the former. These models were never used in wind speed studies before. Both models will be used with Gaussian innovations, and the VAR-DCC model will be also used with Student’s t innovations. These models, which are able to dynamically couple volatilities, are compared to two benchmark model sets, the first set consisting of three independent univariate AR-GARCH (i.e. non-vector) models, the second set consisting of an individual VAR model without the GARCH sector. These benchmark models cannot dynamically couple volatilities. Both benchmark model sets will be used with Gaussian innovations. The time series used for the evaluation are taken from three North-American wind metering sites located at few tens of kilometers from each other. In order to highlight the usefulness of choosing autoregressive coupled volatility schemes for modeling and forecasting spatially and temporally varying wind speed data, a controlled variance electricity generation portfolio example of Markowitz type, typical of Energy Finance, is also discussed at some length. In all, it is concluded that the VAR-DCC model with Student’s t innovations is the most balanced choice for this data set when the three goals of modeling, forecasting and scalability in the number of considered sites are taken into account at once.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucheroni, Carlo & Boland, John & Ragno, Costantino, 2019. "Scenario generation and probabilistic forecasting analysis of spatio-temporal wind speed series with multivariate autoregressive volatility models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1226-1241.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:239:y:2019:i:c:p:1226-1241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191930306X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jung, Jaesung & Broadwater, Robert P., 2014. "Current status and future advances for wind speed and power forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 762-777.
    2. Engle, Robert F. & Kroner, Kenneth F., 1995. "Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCH," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 122-150, February.
    3. Amanda Lenzi & Ingelin Steinsland & Pierre Pinson, 2018. "Benefits of spatiotemporal modeling for short‐term wind power forecasting at both individual and aggregated levels," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), May.
    4. Shen, Zhiwei & Ritter, Matthias, 2016. "Forecasting volatility of wind power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 295-308.
    5. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    6. Bollerslev, Tim, 1990. "Modelling the Coherence in Short-run Nominal Exchange Rates: A Multivariate Generalized ARCH Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(3), pages 498-505, August.
    7. Tse, Y K & Tsui, Albert K C, 2002. "A Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Model with Time-Varying Correlations," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 351-362, July.
    8. Haas, Markus & Liu, Ji-Chun, 2015. "Theory for a Multivariate Markov--switching GARCH Model with an Application to Stock Markets," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112855, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Gneiting, Tilmann & Raftery, Adrian E., 2007. "Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 359-378, March.
    10. Carlo Lucheroni & Carlo Mari, 2018. "Optimal Integration of Intermittent Renewables: A System LCOE Stochastic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson Mitterhofer Iung & Fernando Luiz Cyrino Oliveira & André Luís Marques Marcato, 2023. "A Review on Modeling Variable Renewable Energy: Complementarity and Spatial–Temporal Dependence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Li, Jinghua & Zhou, Jiasheng & Chen, Bo, 2020. "Review of wind power scenario generation methods for optimal operation of renewable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, Saeid & Manjili, Sobhan & Mardani, Abbas & Saraji, Mahyar Kamali, 2021. "An extended new approach for forecasting short-term wind power using modified fuzzy wavelet neural network: A case study in wind power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Zhang, Wenyu & Zhang, Lifang & Wang, Jianzhou & Niu, Xinsong, 2020. "Hybrid system based on a multi-objective optimization and kernel approximation for multi-scale wind speed forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Zhao, Xinyu & Bai, Mingliang & Yang, Xusheng & Liu, Jinfu & Yu, Daren & Chang, Juntao, 2021. "Short-term probabilistic predictions of wind multi-parameter based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network with attention mechanism and multivariate copula distribution estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Lan, Hai & Zhang, Chi & Hong, Ying-Yi & He, Yin & Wen, Shuli, 2019. "Day-ahead spatiotemporal solar irradiation forecasting using frequency-based hybrid principal component analysis and neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 389-402.
    7. Yang, Hongming & Liang, Rui & Yuan, Yuan & Chen, Bowen & Xiang, Sheng & Liu, Junpeng & Zhao, Huan & Ackom, Emmanuel, 2022. "Distributionally robust optimal dispatch in the power system with high penetration of wind power based on net load fluctuation data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    8. Belqasem Aljafari & Subramanian Vasantharaj & Vairavasundaram Indragandhi & Rhanganath Vaibhav, 2022. "Optimization of DC, AC, and Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid-Based IoT Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    9. Zhang, Yi & Cheng, Chuntian & Cao, Rui & Li, Gang & Shen, Jianjian & Wu, Xinyu, 2021. "Multivariate probabilistic forecasting and its performance’s impacts on long-term dispatch of hydro-wind hybrid systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Carlo Lucheroni & Carlo Mari, 2021. "Internal hedging of intermittent renewable power generation and optimal portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 873-893, April.
    11. Kleiman, Rachel M. & Characklis, Gregory W. & Kern, Jordan D. & Gerlach, Robin, 2021. "Characterizing weather-related biophysical and financial risks in algal biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    2. Nakatani, Tomoaki & Teräsvirta, Timo, 2008. "Positivity constraints on the conditional variances in the family of conditional correlation GARCH models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 88-95, June.
    3. Massimiliano Caporin & Michael McAleer, 2011. "Thresholds, news impact surfaces and dynamic asymmetric multivariate GARCH," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 65(2), pages 125-163, May.
    4. Hakim, Abdul & McAleer, Michael, 2009. "Forecasting conditional correlations in stock, bond and foreign exchange markets," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(9), pages 2830-2846.
    5. Pelletier, Denis, 2006. "Regime switching for dynamic correlations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1-2), pages 445-473.
    6. Otranto, Edoardo, 2010. "Identifying financial time series with similar dynamic conditional correlation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Themistoclis Pantos & Stathis Polyzos & Aggelos Armenatzoglou & Ilias Kampouris, 2019. "Volatility Spillovers in Electricity Markets: Evidence from the United States," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 131-143.
    8. Lanza, Alessandro & Manera, Matteo & McAleer, Michael, 2006. "Modeling dynamic conditional correlations in WTI oil forward and futures returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 114-132, June.
    9. Marçal, Emerson Fernandes & Pereira, Pedro L. Valls, 2008. "Testing the Hypothesis of Contagion Using Multivariate Volatility Models," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 28(2), November.
    10. Pedro Nielsen Rotta & Pedro L. Valls Pereira, 2016. "Analysis of contagion from the dynamic conditional correlation model with Markov Regime switching," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(25), pages 2367-2382, May.
    11. Andrea Silvestrini & David Veredas, 2008. "Temporal Aggregation Of Univariate And Multivariate Time Series Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 458-497, July.
    12. Xiaoning Kang & Xinwei Deng & Kam‐Wah Tsui & Mohsen Pourahmadi, 2020. "On variable ordination of modified Cholesky decomposition for estimating time‐varying covariance matrices," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 616-641, December.
    13. de Oliveira, Felipe A. & Maia, Sinézio F. & de Jesus, Diego P. & Besarria, Cássio da N., 2018. "Which information matters to market risk spreading in Brazil? Volatility transmission modelling using MGARCH-BEKK, DCC, t-Copulas," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 83-100.
    14. Marçal, Emerson F. & Valls Pereira, Pedro L., 2008. "Testando A Hipótese De Contágio A Partir De Modelos Multivariados De Volatilidade [Testing the contagion hypotheses using multivariate volatility models]," MPRA Paper 10356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Vu Thanh Hai & Albert K. Tsui & Zhaoyong Zhang, 2013. "Measuring asymmetry and persistence in conditional volatility in real output: evidence from three East Asian tigers using a multivariate GARCH approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(20), pages 2909-2914, July.
    16. Audrone Virbickaite & M. Concepción Ausín & Pedro Galeano, 2015. "Bayesian Inference Methods For Univariate And Multivariate Garch Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 76-96, February.
    17. Carlo Drago & Andrea Scozzari, 2022. "Evaluating conditional covariance estimates via a new targeting approach and a networks-based analysis," Papers 2202.02197, arXiv.org.
    18. Cristina Amado & Annastiina Silvennoinen & Timo Teräsvirta, 2018. "Models with Multiplicative Decomposition of Conditional Variances and Correlations," CREATES Research Papers 2018-14, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    19. Suhejla Hoti & Felix Chan & Michael McAleer, 2003. "Structure and Asymptotic Theory for Multivariate Asymmetric Volatility: Empirical Evidence for Country Risk Ratings," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-203, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    20. Committee, Nobel Prize, 2003. "Time-series Econometrics: Cointegration and Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2003-1, Nobel Prize Committee.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wind dynamics; Stochastic dynamical systems; Forecasting models; Renewable energy finance; Risk assessment and management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:239:y:2019:i:c:p:1226-1241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.