IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000475/013319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelo de evaluación de gestión del conocimiento para las pymes del sector de tecnologías de la Información

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Eduardo Marulanda Echeverry
  • Jaime Alberto Giraldo García
  • Héctor Mauricio Serna Gómez

Abstract

Se presenta en este artículo la validación estadística de un modelo de evaluación de gestión del conocimiento (GC), para pymes de desarrollo de software del triángulo del café de Colombia. Se realiza una investigación confirmatoria de tipo correlacional que se validó con 110 empresas, teniendo en consideración aspectos de infraestructura, uso intensivo de gestión de conocimiento y comunidades de práctica (COP). El modelo se contrasta bajo un análisis factorial confirmatorio que da cumplimiento a los criterios de convergencia, divergencia y fiabilidad conjunta. Se obtuvo un modelo único de evaluación de GC que se fundamenta en lo holístico y la gestión por procesos, el cual evalúa 22 variables, 7 categorías y 3 dimensiones en pymes del sector de tecnologías de la información y comunicaciones (TI), esto permite validar un modelo teórico apropiado a las necesidades de las companías de software, el cual puede ser aplicado en similares sectores en otras ciudades de Colombia y el mundo.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Eduardo Marulanda Echeverry & Jaime Alberto Giraldo García & Héctor Mauricio Serna Gómez, 2015. "Modelo de evaluación de gestión del conocimiento para las pymes del sector de tecnologías de la Información," Revista Ad-Minister, Universidad EAFIT, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000475:013319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/administer/article/view/2576
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feigenberg, Benjamin & Field, Erica M. & Pande, Rohini, 2010. "Building Social Capital through Microfinance," Working Paper Series rwp10-019, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Yang, Jie, 2010. "The knowledge management strategy and its effect on firm performance: A contingency analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 215-223, June.
    3. Shapira, Philip & Youtie, Jan & Yogeesvaran, K. & Jaafar, Zakiah, 2006. "Knowledge economy measurement: Methods, results and insights from the Malaysian Knowledge Content Study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1522-1537, December.
    4. Gratton, Lynda & Ghoshal, Sumantra, 2003. "Managing Personal Human Capital:: New Ethos for the 'Volunteer' Employee," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Paula Almonacid & Isabel Cristina Montes & Juan José Vásquez, 2009. "Un análisis factorial para evaluar la pertinencia de un programa académico desde la perspectiva de los graduados: un estudio de caso," Revista Ecos de Economía, Universidad EAFIT, October.
    6. Darío Liberona & Manuel Ruiz, 2013. "Análisis de la implementación de programas de gestión del conocimiento en las empresas chilenas," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dufhues, Thomas & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Quoc, Hoang Dinh & Munkung, Nuchanata, 2011. "Social capital and loan repayment performance in Southeast Asia," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 679-691.
    2. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Maksim S. Kolyasnikov & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 82-96, September.
    4. Hong Sun & Valentina Hartarska & Lezhu Zhang & Denis Nadolnyak, 2018. "The Influence of Social Capital on Farm Household’s Borrowing Behavior in Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Imai, Katsushi S. & Gaiha, Raghav & Thapa, Ganesh & Annim, Samuel Kobina, 2012. "Microfinance and Poverty—A Macro Perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 1675-1689.
    6. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2021. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis on the Adoption of Environmental Practices: Exploring Technological- and Human-Resource-Based Contributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Samuel Lee & Petra Persson, 2016. "Financing from Family and Friends," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(9), pages 2341-2386.
    8. Usha Sridhar & Sridhar Mandyam, 2016. "Loan Allocation and Guarantee Structure for Group Borrower Networks in Microfinance," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 4(2), pages 100-114, December.
    9. Nguyen Dinh Tho, 2018. "A Configurational Role of Human Capital Resources in the Quality of Work Life of Marketers: FsQCA and SEM Findings from Vietnam," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 461-478, June.
    10. E.V. Orlova, 2021. "Assessment of the Human Capital of an Enterprise and its Management in the Context of the Digital Transformation of the Economy," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(4), pages 666-700.
    11. Xiaoli Shi & Ying Chen & Menghan Xia & Yongli Zhang, 2022. "Effects of the Talent War on Urban Innovation in China: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Kozo Otsuka & Kaoru Natsuda, 2016. "The Determinants Of Total Factor Productivity In The Malaysian Automotive Industry: Are Government Policies Upgrading Technological Capacity?," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 61(04), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Britta Augsburg & Ralph De Haas & Heike Harmgart & Costas Meghir, 2015. "The Impacts of Microcredit: Evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 183-203, January.
    14. Yuki Yamamoto & Kenji Takeuchi & Gunnar Kohlin, 2013. "What Factors Promote Peatland Fire Prevention? Evidence from Central Kalimantan, Indonesia," Discussion Papers 1312, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    15. Bhatti, Waheed Akbar & Larimo, Jorma & Carrasco, Inmaculada, 2016. "Strategy's effect on knowledge sharing in host country networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4769-4774.
    16. Hoff, Karla & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2016. "Striving for balance in economics: Towards a theory of the social determination of behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 126(PB), pages 25-57.
    17. Antonio Rodríguez Andrés & Abraham Otero & Voxi Heinrich Amavilah, 2022. "Knowledge economy classification in African countries: A model-based clustering approach," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 372-396, April.
    18. Lucia Dalla Pellegrina & Angela De Michele & Giorgio Di Maio & Paolo Landoni & Susanna Parravicini, 2021. "Group Meeting Frequency and Borrowers’ Repayment Performance in Microfinance: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in South Africa," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 30(5), pages 447-477.
    19. Deininger, Klaus & Liu, Yanyan, 2013. "Economic and Social Impacts of an Innovative Self-Help Group Model in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 149-163.
    20. Hanas A. Cader & John C. Leatherman, 2012. "Growth of the Knowledge-based Economy in a Two-person Non-cooperative Game," Chapters, in: Knut Ingar Westeren (ed.), Foundations of the Knowledge Economy, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gestión de conocimiento; modelo de evaluación; análisis factorial confirmatorio; sector tecnología de información y comunicaciones; empresas de base tecnológica;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • L8 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000475:013319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heiner Mercado Percia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaeafco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.