IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2020i23p137-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors That Encourage And Discourage The Adoption Of Online Banking In Israel And Their Effect On Customer Satisfaction, From The Point Of View Of Bank Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Ortal FALKOVITCH

    (University ”Alexandru Ioan Cuza” of Iași)

Abstract

The technological revolution has moved the provision of banking services from the branch to the Internet and, due to growing competition, focused the banks’ attention on customer satisfaction and the factors influencing it. The purpose of this article is to examine – from the perspective of bank managers – the factors that encourage or discourage the adoption of online banking services in Israel and their effect on customer satisfaction. Although the topic of adopting online banking services and categorizing relevant factors as either encouraging or discouraging has been studied before, such research has never been conducted in Israel and never from the bank managers’ point of view. The data for this research was obtained by means of semi-structured interviews with bank managers employed in the innovation and digital divisions of two of Israel’s leading banks. The findings revealed connections between encouraging and discouraging factors in adopting online banking in Israel, perceived value and brand perception of online banking, service quality and customer satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ortal FALKOVITCH, 2020. "Factors That Encourage And Discourage The Adoption Of Online Banking In Israel And Their Effect On Customer Satisfaction, From The Point Of View Of Bank Managers," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 23, pages 137-147, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2020:i:23:p:137-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_23_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. Zmud, 1979. "Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(10), pages 966-979, October.
    2. Anssi Mattila & Minna Mattila, 2005. "How perceived security appears in the commercialisation of internet banking," International Journal of Financial Services Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 89-101.
    3. Vijay M. KUMBHAR, 2012. "Reliability Of Ebankqual Scale: Retesting In Internet Banking Service Settings," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(2), pages 13-24, June.
    4. Irina Raluca Busuioc Witowschi & Florin Alexandru Luca, 2016. "Bank Capital, Risk and Performance in European Banking: A Case Study on Seven Banking Sectors," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(2), pages 127-142.
    5. Busuioc Witowschi Irina Raluca & Luca Florin Alexandru, 2015. "Basel III. How Far Have We Come?," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 682-686, May.
    6. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:541:p:1-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Steven Li & Andrew C. Worthington, 2004. "The relationship between the adoption of Internet banking and electronic connectivity: - An international comparison," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 176, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    8. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:2016:y:2016:i:2:id:541:p:1-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Mohammed Sadique Khan & Siba Sankar Mahapatra & Sreekumar, 2009. "Service quality evaluation in internet banking: an empirical study in India," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 30-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vijay M. KUMBHAR, 2012. "Reliability Of Ebankqual Scale: Retesting In Internet Banking Service Settings," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(2), pages 13-24, June.
    2. Sarv Devaraj & Robert F. Easley & J. Michael Crant, 2008. "Research Note ---How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 93-105, March.
    3. Goodwin, Paul & Fildes, Robert & Lawrence, Michael & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2007. "The process of using a forecasting support system," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 391-404.
    4. Bindu K. Nambiar & Kartikeya Bolar, 2023. "Factors influencing customer preference of cardless technology over the card for cash withdrawals: an extended technology acceptance model," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 58-73, March.
    5. Robinson, Leroy Jr. & Marshall, Greg W. & Stamps, Miriam B., 2005. "Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 1623-1631, December.
    6. Guych Nuryyev & Yu-Ping Wang & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Bih-Shiaw Jaw & Yi-Shien Yeh & Hsien-Tang Lin & Li-Fan Wu, 2020. "Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    8. Schmidt, Reinhart, 1983. "The usage of an interactive modeling system," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 127, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    9. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J., 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 587-605, December.
    10. Gelderman, M., 1995. "Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Valipour Pasha , Mohammad & Bastanzad , Hossein, 2017. "E-Banking Impact on the Profit Margin of Banks in Iran," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 12(2), pages 193-211, April.
    12. Bhimani, Alnoor, 2003. "A study of the emergence of management accounting system ethos and its influence on perceived system success," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 523-548, August.
    13. Choden, Khendum & Bagchi, Kallol K. & Udo, Godwin J. & Kirs, Peeter J., 2019. "The influence of individual values on internet use: A multinational study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 198-209.
    14. Afrina Yasmin & Sadia Tasneem & Kaniz Fatema, 2015. "Effectiveness of Digital Marketing in the Challenging Age: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(5), pages 69-80, April.
    15. Lu, Hsi-Peng & Yu, Huei-Ju & Lu, Simon S. K., 2001. "The effects of cognitive style and model type on DSS acceptance: An empirical study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 649-663, June.
    16. Asadollah kordnaeij & Hossein Askaripoor & Abbas Imani, 2013. "The Impact of E-Baking Service Quality Dimensions on Customers' Satisfaction and Brand Equity (Case Study: Refah Bank, Tehran)," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(4), pages 25-37, December.
    17. Zhou, Zhongyun & Jin, Xiao-Ling & Vogel, Douglas R. & Fang, Yulin & Chen, Xiaojian, 2011. "Individual motivations and demographic differences in social virtual world uses: An exploratory investigation in Second Life," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 261-271.
    18. van Bruggen, G.H. & Wierenga, B., 2005. "When are CRM Systems Successful? The Perspective of the User and of the Organization," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-048-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Imola Drigă & Dorina Niţă & Codruţa Dura, 2009. "Aspects Regarding Internet Banking Services in Romania," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 9(3), pages 239-248.
    20. Ortal FALKOVITCH & Carmit Moshe ROZENTAL, 2019. "The Digitalization Of Banking In Israel And Its Effect On Customer Satisfaction. A Qualitative Study From The Perspective Of Managers At Two Israeli Banks," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 14, pages 143-154, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Service quality; Customer satisfaction; Online banking; eBankQual;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2020:i:23:p:137-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.