IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v31y1993i2p235-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace Industrial Relations 25 Years after Donovan: An Employer View

Author

Listed:
  • Robbie Gilbert

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Robbie Gilbert, 1993. "Workplace Industrial Relations 25 Years after Donovan: An Employer View," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 235-253, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:31:y:1993:i:2:p:235-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1993.tb00392.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter N. Ingram, 1991. "Changes in Working Practices in British Manufacturing Industry in the 1980s: A Study of Employee Concessions Made During Wage Negotiations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Purcell, John, 1991. "The Rediscovery of the Management Prerogative: The Management of Labour Relations in the 1980s," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 33-43, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim Morris, 1995. "Annual Review Article 1994," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 117-135, March.
    2. Jeremy Waddington, 1995. "UK Unions: searching for a new agenda," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 1(1), pages 31-43, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janet Walsh, 1993. "Internalization v. Decentralization: An Analysis of Recent Developments in Pay Bargaining," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 409-432, September.
    2. Stephen Dunn, 1993. "From Donovan to … Wherever," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 169-187, June.
    3. P. K. Edwards, 1992. "Industrial Conflict: Themes and Issues in Recent Research," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 361-404, September.
    4. David Metcalf, 1993. "Transformation of British Industrial Relations? Institutions, Conduct and Outcomes 1980-1990," CEP Discussion Papers dp0151, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Paul Marginson, 1992. "European Integration and Transnational Management-Union Relations in the Enterprise," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 30(4), pages 529-545, December.
    6. Stephen Machin, 1995. "Plant Closures and Unionization in British Establishments," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 55-68, March.
    7. Stephen Dunn & Martyn Wright, 1994. "Maintaining the ‘Status Quo’? An Analysis of the Contents of British Collective Agreements, 1979–1990," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 23-46, March.
    8. André Cieplinski, 2017. "Employee Control, Work Content and Wages," Department of Economics University of Siena 775, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    9. P. B. Beaumont, 1992. "Annual Review Article 1991," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 107-125, March.
    10. Gavin Cameron, 2003. "Why Did UK Manufacturing Productivity Growth Slow Down in the 1970s and Speed Up in the 1980s?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 70(277), pages 121-141, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:31:y:1993:i:2:p:235-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.