IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/274584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Drives the Trade Purchaser’s Decision to Purchase a Specific Wine?

Author

Listed:
  • McGarry Wolf, Marianne
  • Higgins, Lindsey M.

Abstract

Trade purchasers, who decide which wines will be sold at retail outlets, have significant purchasing power and influence on the wine industry. Research has shown that consumers perceive the region where wine is produced to have an impact on wine quality (Johnson and Bruwer, 2007). Additional research indicates that wines from different regions generate different market prices (Schamel and Anderson, 2003). How does region influence trade purchasers? This research examines the attitudes of trade wine purchasers regarding drivers of purchase decisions, their familiarity with California growing regions, how often wine region influences their purchase decisions, and their wine quality perceptions based on region. Differences based on business type and location were examined. A November 2014 survey used a database of 1,785 email addresses and had a response rate of 8.5%. Respondents were from 29 states, with the most responses from Florida (24%) and California (22%). A quarter of responses were retail-only buyers, half were from on-premise businesses, and another quarter were from wine bars (8% of which were also wine shops). Respondents were asked to rate the desirability of eight wine features. Features indicated as very desirable were premium quality product and grapes are from a respected wine grape growing region. The characteristics from a well known AVA, sustainably produced, cool climate grapes, and produced in California were rated somewhat to very desirable. Somewhat desirable features were high Wine Spectator rating and high Robert Parker rating. When choosing a wine, 44% choose based on production location always or very often and 88% make the decision based on location at least somewhat often. This is similar to 83% of respondents indicating that well known region is extremely or very desirable. Respondents from the Midwest and the East rated both grapes are from a respected wine grape growing region and from a well known AVA higher than California respondents did. Wine bars rated sustainably produced and produced from cool climate grapes as more desirable than retail outlets did. Respondents were very familiar with California regions examined, with Napa and Sonoma rating most familiar and highest quality. This research shows that trade decision makers use growing region to decide which wines to purchase. Therefore, it is important for wine regions to allocate resources toward trade education concerning characteristics of their growing region and its quality.

Suggested Citation

  • McGarry Wolf, Marianne & Higgins, Lindsey M., 2017. "What Drives the Trade Purchaser’s Decision to Purchase a Specific Wine?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 48(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:274584
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274584/files/JFDR_48.1_40_Wolf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274584?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Günter Schamel & Kym Anderson, 2019. "Wine Quality and Varietal, Regional and Winery Reputations: Hedonic Prices for Australia and New Zealand," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kym Anderson (ed.), The International Economics of Wine, chapter 10, pages 225-253, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincent Hoang & Takao Iida & Shigeru Matsumoto & Natsuki Watanabe & Clevo Wilson, 2016. "Consumer’s comparison between local and imported organic products: a hedonic analysis of the Japanese table wine market," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 405-415, December.
    2. Christopher R. Gustafson & Travis J. Lybbert & Daniel A. Sumner, 2016. "Consumer sorting and hedonic valuation of wine attributes: exploiting data from a field experiment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(1), pages 91-103, January.
    3. Masset, Philippe & Weisskopf, Jean-Philippe & Cardebat, Jean-Marie & Faye, Benoît & Le Fur, Eric, 2021. "Analyzing the risks of an illiquid and global asset: The case of fine wine," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-25.
    4. Danielle Wood & Kym Anderson, 2019. "What Determines the Future Value of an Icon Wine? New Evidence from Australia," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kym Anderson (ed.), The International Economics of Wine, chapter 11, pages 255-282, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Kym Anderson & David Norman & Glyn Wittwer, 2019. "Globalisation of the World’s Wine Markets," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kym Anderson (ed.), The International Economics of Wine, chapter 2, pages 27-50, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Jena, Pradyot R. & Grote, Ulrike, 2012. "Impact Evaluation of Traditional Basmati Rice Cultivation in Uttarakhand State of Northern India: What Implications Does It Hold for Geographical Indications?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1895-1907.
    7. Richard Carew & Wojciech J. Florkowski, 2010. "The Importance of Geographic Wine Appellations: Hedonic Pricing of Burgundy Wines in the British Columbia Wine Market," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 58(1), pages 93-108, March.
    8. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    9. M. Laura Donnet & Dave D. Weatherspoon & Charles B. Moss, 2010. "Measuring Food Product Differentiation by Quality Ratings: A Cross‐Entropy Analysis of Specialty Coffee e‐Auctions," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 122-137, February.
    10. Oczkowski, Edward, 2019. "The relation between Australian wine show results and prices," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 60(2), July.
    11. Teuber, Ramona, 2008. "Geographical Indications and the Value of Reputation - Empirical Evidence for Cafe de Marcala," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43835, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Costanigro, Marco & McCluskey, Jill J. & Mittelhammer, Ronald C., 2006. "Identifying submarket in the wine industry: a multivariate approach to hedonic regression," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21370, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Teuber, Ramona, 2007. "Geographical Indications of Origin as a Tool of Product Differentiation: The Case of Coffee," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7866, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Teuber, Ramona & Herrmann, Roland, 2012. "Towards a differentiated modeling of origin effects in hedonic analysis: An application to auction prices of specialty coffee," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 732-740.
    15. Antonio Iazzi & Oronzo Trio & Monica Fait & Lea Iaia, 2013. "Social web communication and CRM in the marketing strategies of wine enterprises," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 3(1), pages 103-116, December.
    16. YOO, Veronica & FLORKOWSKI, Wojciech J. & CAREW, Richard, 2015. "Pricing Attributes Of Wines From Emerging Suppliers On The British Columbia Market," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, October.
    17. Fleming, Euan & Mounter, Stuart & Grant, Bligh & Griffith, Garry, 2014. "Can we explain variations in winery ratings in Victoria?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 22, pages 1-13.
    18. Catherine Haeck & Giulia Meloni & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "The Value of Terroir: A Historical Analysis of the Bordeaux and Champagne Geographical Indications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 598-619, December.
    19. Bicknell, Kathryn & MacDonald, Ian, 2009. "How Important is Reputation for New Zealand Wine Makers?," 2009 Conference, August 27-28, 2009, Nelson, New Zealand 115717, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Ernesto Tavoletti, 2018. "Un?alternativa alla retorica della dimensione aziendale e degli IDE: sistemi agro-alimentari sostenibili di PMI ed internazionalizzazione endogena per mezzo delle indicazioni geografiche," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 27-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:274584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.