IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/30876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Preferences For Food Safety Attributes In Fresh Apples: Market Segments, Consumer Characteristics, And Marketing Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Baker, Gregory A.

Abstract

Past research has yielded conflicting results on consumer valuation of food safety characteristics. In this study, conjoint analysis is used to evaluate consumer responses to hypothetical apple products in a nationwide survey. Product characteristics include price, quality, pesticide use levels and the corresponding cancer risk, and type of government inspection. Consumers expressed a broad preference for reduced pesticide usage. Four market segments were identified corresponding to consumers: (a) who had a strong preference for food safety, (b) who exhibited a more balanced desire for all product characteristics, (c) who were extremely price sensitive, and (d) who had a strong preference for product quality. Results suggest that consumers in these segments differ based on demographic and psychographic characteristics. This information should prove useful to produce marketers in marketing produce that better meets consumers' needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Baker, Gregory A., 1999. "Consumer Preferences For Food Safety Attributes In Fresh Apples: Market Segments, Consumer Characteristics, And Marketing Opportunities," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:30876
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30876/files/24010080.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.30876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolfo M. Nayga, 1996. "Sociodemographic Influences on Consumer Concern for Food Safety: The Case of Irradiation, Antibiotics, Hormones, and Pesticides," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(3), pages 467-475.
    2. Ladd, George W & Zober, Martin, 1977. "Model of Consumer Reaction to Product Characteristics," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(2), pages 89-101, Se.
    3. Timothy A. Park & Luanne Lohr, 1996. "Supply and Demand Factors for Organic Produce," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(3), pages 647-655.
    4. Frederick V. Waugh, 1928. "Quality Factors Influencing Vegetable Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 185-196.
    5. Baker, Gregory A. & Crosbie, Peter J., 1993. "Measuring Food Safety Preferences: Identifying Consumer Segments," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Anya M. McGuirk & Warren P. Preston & Amy McCormick, 1990. "Toward the development of marketing strategies for food safety attributes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(4), pages 297-308.
    7. H. S. Houthakker, 1952. "Compensated Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 155-164.
    8. Tim Hammonds, 1985. "Public attitudes toward food safety," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(1), pages 33-43.
    9. H. Theil, 1952. "Qualities, Prices and Budget Enquiries," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 129-147.
    10. Magat, Wesley A. & Kip Viscusi, W. & Huber, Joel, 1988. "Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 395-411, December.
    11. Misra, Sukant K. & Huang, Chung L. & Ott, Stephen L., 1991. "Consumer Willingness To Pay For Pesticide-Free Fresh Produce," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baker, Gregory A. & Burnham, Thomas A., 2001. "Consumer Response To Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis And Implications For Producers And Policy Makers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Maria Travisi, Chiara & Nijkamp, Peter & Vindigni, Gabriella, 2006. "Pesticide risk valuation in empirical economics: a comparative approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 455-474, April.
    3. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Research Needs in the Valuation of Food Safety and Nutrition," Staff Paper Series 201172, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    4. Baker, Gregory A. & Crosbie, Peter J., 1993. "Measuring Food Safety Preferences: Identifying Consumer Segments," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Harianto & Quilkey, John J., 1991. "Retail Pricing in Jakarta - An Exploration," 1991 Conference (35th), February 11-14, 1991, Armidale, Australia 145895, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Bodo E. Steiner, 2004. "Australian wines in the British wine market: A hedonic price analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 287-307.
    7. Steiner, Bodo E., 2002. "The Valuation Of Labelling Attributes In A Wine Market," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19718, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Brockmeier, M., 1994. "Messung und Bewertung der Nahrungsmittelqualität auf der Basis von Produkteigenschaften," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 30.
    9. Wu, Ling X. & Kilmer, Richard L., 1988. "A Testable Characteristic Demand Model," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270285, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Houston, Jack E. & Jeong, Kihong & Fletcher, Stanley M., 1989. "Varietal Sales And Quality Differentiation: The Case Of Certified Soybean Seed In The Southeastern U.S," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-8, July.
    11. Goldman, Fred & Grossman, Michael, 1978. "The Demand for Pediatric Care: An Hedonic Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(2), pages 259-280, April.
    12. McFadden, Jonathan R. & Huffman, Wallace E., 2017. "Willingness-to-pay for natural, organic, and conventional foods: The effects of information and meaningful labels," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 214-232.
    13. Hossain, Afjal & Badiuzzaman,, 2021. "Hedonic prices for the fruit market in Bangladesh: Lessons from guava and hog plum purchase decisions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Shonkwiler, J.S. & Brown, Mark G., 1985. "Some Evidence of the Demand for Food Variety: A Case Study of Food Items," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278520, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Rosalie Liccardo Pacula & Michael Grossman & Frank J. Chaloupka & Patrick M. O'Malley & Lloyd D. Johnston & Matthew C. Farrelly, 2001. "Marijuana and Youth," NBER Chapters, in: Risky Behavior among Youths: An Economic Analysis, pages 271-326, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
      • R. L. Pacula & M. Grossman & F. J. Chaloupka & P. M. O'Malley & Lloyd D. Johnston & Matthew C. Farrelly, 2000. "Marijuana and Youth," NBER Working Papers 7703, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Hayden Stewart & Noel Blisard, 2008. "Who Pays More for Food?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 150-168, February.
    17. Julia Bronnmann & Stefan Guettler & Jens-Peter Loy, 2019. "Efficiency of correction for sample selection in QUAIDS models: an example for the fish demand in Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1469-1493, October.
    18. Christian T. Litchepah & Issidor. Noumba & Mohammadou. Nourou, 2022. "Does reducing violence against women improve children’s health? The case of Cameroon," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(6), pages 187-194, June.
    19. Peter Nijkamp & Chiara Maria Travisi & Gabriella Vindigni, 2002. "Pesticide Risk Valuation in Empirical Economics," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-112/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Guijing WANG & Stanley M. FLETCHER & Dale H. CARLEY, "undated". "Determinants Of Demand For Beef: The Impact Of Fat Trimming," Department of Resource Economics Regional Research Project 95412, University of Massachusetts.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:30876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.