Many open-access resources, such as elephants, are used to produce storable goods. Anticipated future scarcity of these resources will increase current prices and poaching. This implies that, for given initial conditions, there may be rational expectations equilibria leading to both extinction and survival. The cheapest way for governments to eliminate extinction equilibria may be to commit to tough antipoaching measures if the population falls below a threshold. For governments without credibility, the cheapest way to eliminate extinction equilibria may be to accumulate a sufficient stockpile of the storable good and threaten to sell it should the population fall.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 90 (2000) Issue (Month): 1 (March) Pages: 212-234 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Michael Kremer & Charles Morcom, 1996.
"Elephants,"
NBER Working Papers
5674, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Kremer, M. & Morcom, C., 1996.
"Elephants,"
Working papers
96-17, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Michael Kremer & Charles Morcom, 2003.
"Elephants: Reply,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1446-1448, September.
[Downloadable!]
Erwin H. Bulte & Richard D. Horan & Jason F. Shogren, 2003.
"Elephants: Comment,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1437-1445, September.
[Downloadable!]