IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v32y2019i2no4p61-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dialogue on Reform in Mainstream Economics and its Implications for the Islamic Economics Discipline حوار حول الإصلاح في الاقتصاد السائد وانعكاسه على الاقتصاد الإسلامي

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Reardon

    (Founding Editor, International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education Professor, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, USA)

Abstract

While the most recent financial crisis highlighted a myriad of problems within mainstream economics, the call for reform has been widespread, long-standing, and deep-seated. This paper reaffirms this call from an historical perspective, with accelerating climate change adding a sense of urgency. Unfortunately, mainstream economics is not capable of self-reformation; instead, it has erected formidable barriers. Not surprisingly, as this paper highlights, little substantive reform has occurred within mainstream economics, while the outside urge to reform continues unabated. This paper calls for pluralism as a compelling and necessary (but not sufficient) intellectual foundation for reform, and concludes by logically pointing to the wisdom of Islamic economics. أبرزت الأزمة المالية العالمية الأخيرة عدداً من التشوهات في الاقتصاد السائد، لذلك كانت الدعوة إلى الإصلاح واسعة النطاق، وطويلة الأمد، وعميقة الجذور. تؤكد هذه الورقة على أهمية إصلاح الاقتصاد من المنظور التاريخي، -حيث كان الاقتصاد في الماضي يتميز بقدر أكبر من التعددية العلمية - مع إضافة آثار التغيرات المناخية على النمو الاقتصادي التي ولدت شعورًا قوياً للرغبة في التغيير. إلا أنه ولسوء الحظ فإن الاقتصاد السائد غير قادر على الإصلاح من تلقاء نفسه؛ حيث إن هناك دعوات لتكريس أحاديَّة الاقتصاد تشكل عقبة في سبيل هذا الاصلاح، وهذا ليس مستغرباً. توضح الورقة أن هناك بعض الإصلاحات الجوهرية البسيطة التي حدثت في الاقتصاد السائد، استجابة للدعوات المستمرة والملحة للإصلاح. كما تدعو الورقة إلى تعددية النظريات الاقتصادية باعتبارها أساسًا فكريًا ضروريًا وإجباريًا - ولكن ليس كافيًا-للإصلاح، وتشير الورقة إلى حكمة وواقعية معالجة الاقتصاد الإسلامي لكثير من المشكلات الاقتصادية السائدة.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Reardon, 2019. "Dialogue on Reform in Mainstream Economics and its Implications for the Islamic Economics Discipline حوار حول الإصلاح في الاقتصاد السائد وانعكاسه على الاقتصاد الإسلامي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 61-75, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:32:y:2019:i:2:no:4:p:61-75
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.32-2.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153868_32-02-04-Jack-Reardon3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.32-2.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan B. Wight, 2011. "Ethics and Critical Thinking," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Smith, Adam, 1759. "The Theory of Moral Sentiments," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number smith1759.
    3. Ioana Negru, 2009. "Reflections on pluralism in economics," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 7-21.
    4. Abdul Azim Islahi, 2014. "History of Islamic Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16105.
    5. Ioana Negru, 2017. "Modes of pluralism: critical commentary on roundtable dialogue on pluralism," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 193-209.
    6. Arne Heise, 2017. "Defining economic pluralism: ethical norm or scientific imperative," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 18-41.
    7. Sheila Dow, 2009. "History of Thought and Methodology in Pluralist Economics Education," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(2), pages 41-57.
    8. Ioana Negru, 2010. "Plurality to pluralism in economics pedagogy: the role of critical thinking," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 185-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Anas Zarqa, 2019. "Islamic and Conventional Economics – Dialogue and Ethics الحوار والأخلاق بين الاقتصادَيْـن الإسلامي والتقليدي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 125-135, January.
    2. Steve Keen, 2019. "Economics: What to Do About an Unreformable Discipline? الاقتصاد: ماذا نفعل لعلم غير قابل للإصلاح؟," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 109-117, January.
    3. Mabid Ali Mohamed Mahmoud Al-Jarhi, 2019. "Islamic Economics: An Agenda for Intellectual and Institutional Reform الاقتصاد الإسلامي: جدول أعمال للإصلاح الفكري والمؤسسي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 99-108, January.
    4. Mansor Haji Ibrahim, 2019. "Rethinking Islamic Economics إعادة التفكير في الاقتصاد الإسلامي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 119-124, January.
    5. Asad Zaman, 2019. "Launching a Revolution, based on Islamic Foundations إطلاق ثورة في الاقتصاد، تقوم على القيم الإسلامية," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 77-88, January.
    6. Salman Ahmed Shaikh, 2021. "A Review of the Transformative School in Islamic Economics مراجعة للمدرسة التحويلية في الاقتصاد الإسلامي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 34(2), pages 185-201, July.
    7. Volker Nienhaus, 2019. "The Reform Agenda of Mainstream Economics: Importance, Relevance, and Obstacles for Islamic Economics جدول أعمال إصلاح الفكر الاقتصادي السائد: الأهمية، والملاءمة، والعقبات للاقتصاد الإسلامي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 89-97, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William A. Jackson, 2018. "Strategic Pluralism and Monism in Heterodox Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 237-251, June.
    2. Robert F. Garnett & Jack Reardon, 2011. "Pluralism in Economics Education," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 23, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Robert Garnett & John Reardon, 2011. "Big Think: A Model for Critical Inquiry in Economics Courses," Working Papers 201102, Texas Christian University, Department of Economics.
    4. Francisco Alvarez-Cuadrado & Ngo Van Long, 2012. "Envy and Inequality," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 114(3), pages 949-973, September.
    5. Arne HEISE, 2020. "Comparing economic theories or: pluralism in economics and the need for a comparative approach to scientific research programmes," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 162-184, November.
    6. Benno Torgler & Markus Schaffner & Bruno S. Frey & Sascha L. Schmidt, 2008. "Looking Awkward When Winning and Foolish When Losing: Inequity Aversion and Performance in the Field," CREMA Working Paper Series 2008-11, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    7. Ioana Negru, 2013. "Revisiting the Concept of Schools of Thought in Economics: The Example of the Austrian School," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 983-1008, October.
    8. Charles M. A. Clark, 2021. "Editor’s Introduction: Economics and the Option for the Poor," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(4), pages 1051-1059, September.
    9. Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco & Van Long, Ngo, 2011. "The relative income hypothesis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1489-1501, September.
    10. Stark, Oded & Zawojska, Ewa & Kohler, Wilhelm & Szczygielski, Krzysztof, 2018. "An adverse social welfare effect of a doubly gainful trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 77-84.
    11. Gregg, Paul & Grout, Paul A. & Ratcliffe, Anita & Smith, Sarah & Windmeijer, Frank, 2011. "How important is pro-social behaviour in the delivery of public services?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 758-766.
    12. Klein, Daniel & Orsborn, Aaron, 2009. "Concatenate coordination and mutual coordination," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 176-187, October.
    13. Frans van Winden & Mirre Stallen & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2008. "On the Nature, Modeling, and Neural Bases of Social Ties," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-063/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Andrew Lynn, 2022. "Ethics, Economics, and the Specter of Naturalism: The Enduring Relevance of the Harmony Doctrine School of Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 661-673, July.
    15. Wolfson, Dirk J., 2014. "Who gets what in environmental policy?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 8-14.
    16. Puri, Manju & Robinson, David T., 2007. "Optimism and economic choice," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 71-99, October.
    17. Michele Belot & Marcel Fafchamps, 2012. "Good Samaritans and the Market: Experimental Evidence on Other-Regarding Preferences," Discussion Papers 2012001, University of Oxford, Nuffield College.
    18. Smith, Vernon L. & Wilson, Bart J., 2018. "Equilibrium play in voluntary ultimatum games: Beneficence cannot be extorted," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 452-464.
    19. Gerda Dewit & Dermot Leahy, 2015. "Tax Uniformity: A Commitment Device for Restraining Opportunistic Behavior," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 17(5), pages 641-672, October.
    20. Rafi Chowdhury & Mario Fernando, 2014. "The Relationships of Empathy, Moral Identity and Cynicism with Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs: The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 677-694, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pluralism; Economics education; Reform of economics; Pluralism. التعددية ، تعليم الاقتصاد ، إصلاح الاقتصاد;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925
    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:32:y:2019:i:2:no:4:p:61-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.