IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/ecolec/v146y2018icp347-358.html

Context Matters: Exploring the Cost-effectiveness of Fixed Payments and Procurement Auctions for PES

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Erik Ansink & Jelmer van 't Veer, 2025. "Conservation targeting under fragmentation: Evidence from the Dutch river area," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 25-060/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 02 Apr 2026.
  2. Herring, Matthew W. & Garnett, Stephen T. & Zander, Kerstin K., 2022. "Producing rice while conserving the habitat of an endangered waterbird: Incentives for farmers to integrate water management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
  3. Alif, Živa & Thoyer, Sophie & Preget, Raphaële & Šumrada, Tanja, 2026. "Eliciting 10% of semi-natural habitats on farmland for biodiversity: Recommendations for cost-effective policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
  4. Yan Yu & Ya Wu & Pan Wang & Yili Zhang & Liang Emlyn Yang & Xian Cheng & Jianzhong Yan, 2021. "Grassland Subsidies Increase the Number of Livestock on the Tibetan Plateau: Why Does the “Payment for Ecosystem Services” Policy Have the Opposite Outcome?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
  5. Nguyen, Chi & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Hanley, Nick & Iftekhar, Sayed, 2025. "Conservation auctions for landscape-scale environmental management: Does spatial configuration matter for economic and ecological outcomes?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
  6. Chi Nguyen & Uwe Latacz‐Lohmann & Nick Hanley, 2024. "Agri‐environmental Schemes Require Improved Design for Better Outcomes," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 23(3), pages 14-21, December.
  7. Samuel D. Bell & Nadia A. Streletskaya, 2019. "The Random Quantity Mechanism: Laboratory and Field Tests of a Novel Cost-Revealing Procurement Mechanism," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(3), pages 899-921, July.
  8. Friederike Lehn & Enno Bahrs, 2018. "Land-Use Competition or Compatibility between Nature Conservation and Agriculture? The Impact of Protected Areas on German Standard Farmland Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
  9. Luc Behaghel & Karen Macours & Julie Subervie, 2018. "Can RCTs help improve the design of CAP," Working Papers hal-01974425, HAL.
  10. Luc Behaghel & Karen Macours & Julie Subervie, 2019. "How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(3), pages 473-493.
  11. Kangas, Johanna & Ollikainen, Markku, 2025. "Towards an efficient implementation of the EU biodiversity strategy in forests – An analysis of alternative voluntary conservation mechanisms and selection criteria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
  12. Cardona Santos, Elsa & Storm, Hugo & Rasch, Sebastian, 2021. "The cost-effectiveness of conservation auctions in the presence of asset specificity: An agent-based model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  13. Ito, Junichi & Feuer, Hart N. & Kitano, Shinichi & Asahi, Haruka, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of Japan's community-based direct payment scheme for hilly and mountainous areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 62-75.
  14. Nguyen, Chi & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Hanley, Nick & Schilizzi, Steven & Iftekhar, Sayed, 2022. "Spatial Coordination Incentives for landscape-scale environmental management: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
  15. Thilo W. Glebe, 2022. "The influence of contract length on the performance of sequential conservation auctions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 739-764, March.
  16. Berthet, Alice & Vincent, Audrey & Fleury, Philippe, 2021. "Water quality issues and agriculture: An international review of innovative policy schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  17. Ito, Junichi, 2022. "Program design and heterogeneous treatment effects of payments for environmental services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
  18. Wallander, Steven & Paul, Laura A. & Ferraro, Paul J. & Messer, Kent D. & Iovanna, Richard, 2023. "Informational nudges in conservation auctions: A field experiment with U.S. farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
  19. Paulo Santos & Benjamin Chipperfield & Shipra Shah, 2025. "Understanding the potential adoption of agroforestry in Fiji using procurement auctions," Monash Economics Working Papers 2025-07, Monash University, Department of Economics.
  20. Harriet Toto Olita & Md. Sayed Iftekhar & Steven G. M. Schilizzi, 2023. "Optimizing contract allocation for risky conservation tenders," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(1), pages 63-85, January.
  21. Nguyen, Chi & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2023. "Assessing the performance of agglomeration bonus in budget-constrained conservation auctions," 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 334544, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
  22. De Petris, Caterina & Drechsler, Martin, 2023. "Harnessing social norms to gain cost-effectiveness in conservation schemes through dynamic scheme design: implications of bounded rationality and other-regarding preferences for Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES)," MPRA Paper 119534, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Jan 2024.
  23. Fridahl, Mathias & Möllersten, Kenneth & Lundberg, Liv & Rickels, Wilfried, 2024. "Potential and goal conflicts in reverse auction design for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 306863, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
  24. Kangas, Johanna & Kotiaho, Janne S. & Ollikainen, Markku, 2026. "Ambitious forest biodiversity conservation under scarce public funds: Introducing a deferrence mechanism to conservation auctions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
  25. Ferré, Marie & Engel, Stefanie & Gsottbauer, Elisabeth, 2018. "Which Agglomeration Payment for a Sustainable Management of Organic Soils in Switzerland? – An Experiment Accounting for Farmers' Cost Heterogeneity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 24-33.
  26. Oliveira Fiorini, Ana Carolina & Mullally, Conner & Swisher, Marilyn & Putz, Francis E., 2020. "Forest cover effects of payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from an impact evaluation in Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.