IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/bla/jomstd/v30y1993i6p997-1015.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Philippe Baumard, 1996. "Organizations in the Fog: An Investigation into the Dynamics of Knowledge," Post-Print hal-03230959, HAL.
  2. Beau, Pauline & Jerman, Lambert, 2022. "Bonding forged in “auditing hell”: The emotional qualities of Big Four auditors," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  3. Styhre, Alexander, 2011. "Institutionalizing technoscience: Post-genomic technologies and the case of systems biology," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 375-388.
  4. Virva Salmivaara & Ewald Kibler, 2020. "“Rhetoric Mix†of Argumentations: How Policy Rhetoric Conveys Meaning of Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 700-732, July.
  5. Khuong Le-Nguyen & Romano Dyerson & G. Harindranath, 2018. "Exploring knowledge management software implementation from a knowing-in-practice perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1117-1133, October.
  6. Federica Bosco & Chiara Di Gerio & Gloria Fiorani, 2023. "La sfida della sostenibilit? nelle organizzazioni pubbliche ad alta intensit? di conoscenza. Un modello per integrare le logiche ESG all?interno delle corporate strategies delle organizzazioni sanitar," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(128), pages 47-75.
  7. Luis Enrique Santiago, 2020. "The industries of the future in Mexico: Local and non‐local effects in the localization of “knowledge‐intensive services”," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 584-606, June.
  8. Christopher Arz, 2017. "Mechanisms of Organizational Culture for Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(04), pages 361-409, December.
  9. Williams, Christopher & van Triest, Sander, 2023. "Understanding performance in professional services for innovation intermediation: Technology consultants vs. management consultants," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
  10. Nikolova, Natalia & Möllering, Guido & Reihlen, Markus, 2015. "Trusting as a ‘Leap of Faith’: Trust-building practices in client–consultant relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 232-245.
  11. Mohammed Hossain & Md. Tarikul Islam & Mahmood Ahmed Momin & Shamsun Nahar & Md. Samsul Alam, 2019. "Understanding Communication of Sustainability Reporting: Application of Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 563-586, December.
  12. Khuong, Le-Nguyen & Harindranath, G. & Dyerson, Romano, 2014. "Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: A case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 226-247.
  13. La Torre, Matteo & Dumay, John & Rea, Michele Antonio & Abhayawansa, Subhash, 2020. "A journey towards a safe harbour: The rhetorical process of the International Integrated Reporting Council," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
  14. Peter Fleming & Bill Harley & Graham Sewell, 2004. "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: getting below the surface of the growth of ‘knowledge work’ in Australia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(4), pages 725-747, December.
  15. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
  16. Hala Alaraj & Majsa Allelin & Matilda Amundsen Bergström & Camilla Brudin Borg, 2019. "Internship as a Mean for Integration. A Critical Study," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 323-340, May.
  17. Mallett, Oliver & Wapshott, Robert, 2012. "Mediating ambiguity: Narrative identity and knowledge workers," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 16-26.
  18. Hoyer, Patrizia, 2016. "Making space for ambiguity: Rethinking organizational identification from a career perspective," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 166-177.
  19. Emily E. Griffith, 2020. "Auditors, Specialists, and Professional Jurisdiction in Audits of Fair Values†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 245-276, March.
  20. repec:osf:socarx:yqhjx_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
  21. Elizabeth Goodrick & Lee C. Jarvis & Trish Reay, 2020. "Preserving a Professional Institution: Emotion in Discursive Institutional Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 735-774, June.
  22. Prpić, John, 2017. "Project Risk Management Incorporating Knight, Ellsberg & Kahneman," SocArXiv yqhjx, Center for Open Science.
  23. Anderson-Gough, Fiona & Edgley, Carla & Robson, Keith & Sharma, Nina, 2022. "Organizational responses to multiple logics: Diversity, identity and the professional service firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  24. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
  25. Brown, Paul & Ly, Tuan & Pham, Hannah & Sivabalan, Prabhu, 2020. "Automation and management control in dynamic environments: Managing organisational flexibility and energy efficiency in service sectors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
  26. Leire Gartzia, 2021. "Gender Equality in Business Action: A Multi-Agent Change Management Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
  27. Mayer, Maryse & Gendron, Yves, 2024. "“Fly alone, die alone”? The clan and the production of tax expertise," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.