IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/zewdok/340113.html

Dokumentation zur Innovationserhebung 2025 - Ergebnisse zu Schwerpunktfragen

Author

Listed:
  • Rammer, Christian
  • Schubert, Torben

Abstract

Das Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) erhebt seit 1993 jährlich die Innovationsaktivitäten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Die Erhebung findet im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt (BMFTR) statt und wird in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Fraunhofer Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung sowie dem Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft (infas) durchgeführt. Sie ist als eine Panelerhebung konzipiert und wird als Mannheimer Innovationspanel (MIP) bezeichnet. Die Innovationserhebung ist alle zwei Jahre der deutsche Beitrag zu den Community Innovation Surveys (CIS) der Europäischen Kommission und beruht konzeptionell auf dem Oslo-Manual von OECD und Eurostat.

Suggested Citation

  • Rammer, Christian & Schubert, Torben, 2026. "Dokumentation zur Innovationserhebung 2025 - Ergebnisse zu Schwerpunktfragen," ZEW Dokumentationen 26-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zewdok:340113
    Note: Arten von Innovationen, Neuheitsgrad von Produktinnovationen, Entwickler von Innovationen, FuE-Aktivitäten, Verzichtsgründe, Umweltinnovationen, soziale Innovationen, Finanzierung und öffentliche Förderung, Kooperationen, intellektuelles Eigentum, künstliche Intelligenz, Anschaffung neuer Technologien, Wettbewerbsumfeld
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/340113/1/1969302321.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bettina Peters & Christian Rammer, 2023. "Innovation panel surveys in Germany: the Mannheim Innovation Panel," Chapters, in: Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, chapter 5, pages 54-87, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Carol Corrado & Charles Hulten & Daniel Sichel, 2005. "Measuring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Framework," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Capital in the New Economy, pages 11-46, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Rammer, Christian & Roth, Felix & Trunschke, Markus, 2020. "Measuring organisation capital at the firm level: A production function approach," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-021, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Bersch, Johannes & Gottschalk, Sandra & Müller, Bettina & Niefert, Michaela, 2014. "The Mannheim Enterprise Panel (MUP) and firm statistics for Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-104, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roth, Felix & Rammer, Christian, 2025. "Intangible Assets and Productivity at the Firm Level: R&D versus non-R&D Intangibles," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 20, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    2. Rammer, Christian & Schubert, Torben, 2022. "Dokumentation zu den Innovationserhebungen 2017 bis 2021," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 270423.
    3. Rammer, Christian & Schubert, Torben, 2024. "Dokumentation zur Innovationserhebung 2023: Ergebnisse zu sozialen Innovationen, Umweltinnovationen, Energienutzung und Innovationshemmnissen," ZEW Dokumentationen 24-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Roth, Felix & Sen, Ali & Rammer, Christian, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Firm-Level Productivity – Evidence from Germany," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 9, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    5. Behrens, Vanessa & Berger, Marius & Hud, Martin & Hünermund, Paul & Iferd, Younes & Peters, Bettina & Rammer, Christian & Schubert, Torben, 2017. "Innovation activities of firms in Germany - Results of the German CIS 2012 and 2014: Background report on the surveys of the Mannheim Innovation Panel Conducted in the Years 2013 to 2016," ZEW Dokumentationen 17-04, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Rammer, Christian, 2020. "Dokumentation zur Innovationserhebung 2019," ZEW Dokumentationen 20-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Rammer, Christian & Schubert, Torben, 2022. "Dokumentation zur Innvoationserhebung 2017 bis 2021," ZEW Dokumentationen 22-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Kyoji Fukao & Cristiano Perugini, 2021. "The Long‐Run Dynamics of the Labor Share in Japan," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 445-480, June.
    9. Qing Li & Long Hai Vo, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Vietnamese Enterprises," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-02, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    10. Anmol Bhandari & Ellen R. McGrattan, 2017. "Sweat Equity in U.S. Private Business," Staff Report 560, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    11. Carol Corrado & Mary O'Mahony & Lea Samek, 2020. "Measuring education services using lifetime incomes," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2020-02, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    12. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    13. De, Supriyo, 2014. "Intangible capital and growth in the ‘new economy’: Implications of a multi-sector endogenous growth model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 25-42.
    14. Blesse, Sebastian & Diegmann, André, 2022. "The place-based effects of police stations on crime: Evidence from station closures," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    15. Emanuele Giovannetti & Claudio Piga, 2023. "The multifaceted nature of cooperation for innovation, ICT and innovative outcomes: evidence from UK Microdata," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(3), pages 639-666, September.
    16. Sebastien Bradley & Estelle Dauchy & Makoto Hasegawa, 2018. "Investor valuations of Japan’s adoption of a territorial tax regime: quantifying the direct and competitive effects of international tax reform," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 581-630, June.
    17. Ellen R. McGrattan & Edward C. Prescott, 2005. "Taxes, Regulations, and the Value of U.S. and U.K. Corporations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(3), pages 767-796.
    18. Ellen McGrattan, 2012. "Transition to FDI Openness: Reconciling Theory and Evidence," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 15(4), pages 437-458, October.
    19. Bart van Ark, 2015. "From Mind the Gap to Closing the Gap. Avenues to Reverse Stagnation in Europe through Investment and Productivity Growth," European Economy - Discussion Papers 006, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    20. repec:ces:ifodic:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:19191583 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Edquist, Harald, 2009. "How Much does Sweden Invest in Intangible Assets?," Working Paper Series 785, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zewdok:340113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zemande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.