IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbmit/spiv2012701.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bystander responses and xenophobic mobilization

Author

Listed:
  • Braun, Robert
  • Koopmans, Ruud

Abstract

Students of social movements have long struggled with the question how relatively abstract political opportunities, such as elite divisions, affect unorganized activists without much knowledge of politics. We argue that the relationship between institutional opportunities and decisions to mobilize may take the form of trickle-down politics. In this view activists are affected by political opportunities indirectly through the changes that political developments bring about in the immediate social setting in which they protest. The overall political climate determines the distance between general public opinion and activists' view on society. The smaller this distance the more likely it becomes that activists receive positive feedback from their immediate environment, which in turn results in further mobilization. In particular, we investigate how extreme right activists are influenced by bystander responses that are evoked by the wider political context. Time-series analysis and event history models indeed indicate that spatiotemporal fluctuations in political opportunities and public sentiments are translated into mobilization after activists receive feedback from local bystanders. This suggests that bystander responses, a research topic that has only received scant scholarly attention, play a crucial role in linking political opportunities to mobilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Braun, Robert & Koopmans, Ruud, 2012. "Bystander responses and xenophobic mobilization," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Migration, Integration, Transnationalization SP IV 2012-701, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmit:spiv2012701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/68460/1/733982611.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brandt, Patrick T. & Williams, John T., 2001. "A Linear Poisson Autoregressive Model: The Poisson AR(p) Model," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 164-184, January.
    2. Le Bon, Gustave, 1896. "The Crowd, A Study of the Popular Mind," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number lebon1896.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braun, Robert & Koopmans, Ruud, 2014. "Watch the Crowd: Bystander Responses, Trickle-Down Politics, and Xenophobic Mobilization," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 631-658.
    2. Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Collectivism and commonality in liquidity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 137-162.
    3. Will H. Moore, 2015. "Tilting at a windmill? The conceptual problem in contemporary peace science," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(4), pages 356-369, September.
    4. Tom S. Clark, 2009. "The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 971-989, October.
    5. Zysberg Leehu, 2018. "The People Demand Social Justice: The Social Protest in Israel as an Agoral Gathering," Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration, Sciendo, vol. 24(2), pages 31-45, December.
    6. Jonathan Haidt & J. Patrick Seder & Selin Kesebir, 2008. "Hive Psychology, Happiness, and Public Policy," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(S2), pages 133-156, June.
    7. Benjamin O. Fordham, 2002. "Another Look at “Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroadâ€," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(4), pages 572-596, August.
    8. Cyanne E. Loyle & Christopher Sullivan & Christian Davenport, 2014. "The Northern Ireland Research Initiative: Data on the Troubles from 1968 to 19981," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(1), pages 94-106, February.
    9. Ho, Tzu-Ya & Tsai, Hsien-Tang & Lin, Pao-Hui, 2019. "The effects of technology innovation and network presence on Otaku identity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 82-92.
    10. Paul Marsden, 1998. "The Selectionist Paradigm: More Implications for Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 3(4), pages 26-36, December.
    11. Rossouw, Stephanié & Greyling, Talita, 2022. "Collective emotions and macro-level shocks: COVID-19 vs the Ukrainian war," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1210, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Merz, Nicolas, 2017. "Gaining voice in the mass media: The effect of parties’ strategies on party–issue linkages in election news coverage," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 436-460.
    13. Nepp, Alexander & Okhrin, Ostap & Egorova, Julia & Dzhuraeva, Zarnigor & Zykov, Alexander, 2022. "What threatens stock markets more - The coronavirus or the hype around it?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 519-539.
    14. Worrall, John L. & Hiromoto, Scott & Merritt, Nancy & Du, Dan & Jacobson, Jerry O. & Iguchi, Martin Y., 2009. "Crime trends and the effect of mandated drug treatment: Evidence from California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 109-113, March.
    15. Danquah, M. & Ouattara, B., 2023. "Aid and social cohesion," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 118-131.
    16. Michelle Baddeley, 2020. "Hoarding in the age of COVID-19," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S), pages 69-75, June.
    17. Carter, Travis M. & Turner, Noah D., 2021. "Examining the immediate effects of COVID-19 on residential and commercial burglaries in Michigan: An interrupted time-series analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    18. Yuelei Sui & Scott H. Holan & Wen-Hsi Yang, 2023. "Computationally Efficient Poisson Time-Varying Autoregressive Models through Bayesian Lattice Filters," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Kritikos, Alexander S. & Bolle, Friedel & Tan, Jonathan H.W., 2007. "The economics of solidarity: A conceptual framework," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 73-89, February.
    20. Benjamin O. Fordham, 2004. "A Very Sharp Sword," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(5), pages 632-656, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmit:spiv2012701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.