IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbmdy/fsiv9743.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does governance matter? Performance and corporate governance structures of Japanese keiretsu groups

Author

Listed:
  • Moerke, Andreas

Abstract

The paper presents an investigation of 72 Japanese manufacturing firms from five different industries with the focus on horizontal industrial groups (keiretsu). Data source was the Kaisha Database at the Science Center Berlin. The main findings are: Using the hexagon criterion to estimate the excellence of firms, the independent firms achieved better results. Thus we conclude that belonging to a keiretsu is no longer a guarantee for the success of a company. A different bank-firm relationship leads to different income distribution: the „old” keiretsu pay higher wages while the independent firms pay more dividend per share. Our best speculation is that the “old” keiretsu are still somewhat isolated from the market and the independent firms have to be more attractive to their shareholders. The structure of the boards of directors differs in following points: keiretsu firms have clearly larger boards than independent firms. Independent firms have on the average less directors dispatched from financial institutions, but do have a higher number of outsiders. They appoint more amakudari bureaucrats from the Bank of Japan and the Ministry of Finance to outbalance the better bank-firm relations of the keiretsu. The keiretsu, however, appoint more bureaucrats from state institutions related directly to their business.

Suggested Citation

  • Moerke, Andreas, 1997. "Does governance matter? Performance and corporate governance structures of Japanese keiretsu groups," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 97-43, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmdy:fsiv9743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/51173/1/250472910.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takeo Hoshi & Anil Kashyap & David Scharfstein, 1991. "Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(1), pages 33-60.
    2. Albach, Horst & Moerke, Andreas, 1996. "Die Überlegenheit der japanischen Unternehmen im globalen Wettbewerb," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 96-4, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Moerke, Andreas, 1997. "Japanische Unternehmensgruppen: Eine empirische Analyse," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 97-42, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mosley, Hugh & Mayer, Antje, 1999. "Benchmarking national labour market performance: A radar chart approach," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment FS I 99-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Albach, Horst & Görtzen, Ulrike & Miarka, Tobias & Moerke, Andreas & Westphal, Thomas & Zobel, Rita, 2000. "Documentation of the Kaisha-Database - The annual accounts database of Japanese stock companies 1970-1999. With a detailed glossary of Japanese accounting terminology," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 00-10, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Albach, Horst & Görtzen, Ulrike & Miarka, Tobias & Moerke, Andreas & Westphal, Thomas & Zobel, Rita, 1997. "Dokumentation der Kaisha-Datenbank - Zur Datenbank der Jahresabschlüsse japanischer Industrieaktiengesellschaften 1970-1997," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 97-39, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albach, Horst & Görtzen, Ulrike & Miarka, Tobias & Moerke, Andreas & Westphal, Thomas & Zobel, Rita, 2000. "Documentation of the Kaisha-Database - The annual accounts database of Japanese stock companies 1970-1999. With a detailed glossary of Japanese accounting terminology," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 00-10, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Moerke, Andreas, 1997. "Japanische Unternehmensgruppen: Eine empirische Analyse," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 97-42, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Barucci, Emilio & Mattesini, Fabrizio, 2008. "Bank shareholding and lending: Complementarity or substitution? Some evidence from a panel of large Italian firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2237-2247, October.
    4. Takeo Hoshi & Anil Kashyap & David Scharfstein, 1993. "The Choice Between Public and Private Debt: An Analysis of Post-Deregulation Corporate Financing in Japan," NBER Working Papers 4421, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Ly, Kim Cuong & Liu, Hong & Opong, Kwaku, 2017. "Who acquires whom among stand-alone commercial banks and bank holding company affiliates?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 144-158.
    6. Randall S. Kroszner & Philip E. Strahan, 1999. "Bankers on Boards: Monitoring, Conflicts of Interest, and Lender Liability," NBER Working Papers 7319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Juan Pablo Medina, 2004. "Endogenous Financial Constraints: Persistence and Interest Rate Fluctuations," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 290, Central Bank of Chile.
    8. Takatoshi Ito & Tokuo Iwaisako, 1996. "Explaining Asset Bubbles in Japan," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 14(1), pages 143-193, July.
    9. Mu-Shun Wang & Shaio Yan Huang & An An Chiu, 2011. "Liquidity, Management Effort And Performance," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14.
    10. Javier Alejo & Antonio Galvao & Gabriel Montes-Rojas & Walter Sosa-Escudero, 2015. "Tests for normality in linear panel-data models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(3), pages 822-832, September.
    11. Jarko Fidrmuc & Philipp Schreiber & Martin Siddiqui, 2018. "Intangible Assets and the Determinants of a Single Bank Relation of German SMEs," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 5-30.
    12. Marco Bonomo & Ricardo Brito & Bruno Martins, 2014. "Macroeconomic and Financial Consequences of the After Crisis Government-Driven Credit Expansion in Brazil," Working Papers Series 378, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    13. Robert E. Carpenter & Steven M. Fazzari & Bruce C. Petersen, 1994. "Inventory (Dis)Investment, Internal Finance Fluctuations, and the Business Cycle," Macroeconomics 9401001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Arslan, Ozgur & Florackis, Chrisostomos & Ozkan, Aydin, 2006. "The role of cash holdings in reducing investment-cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from a financial crisis period in an emerging market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 320-338, December.
    15. Paul Mizen & Cihan Yalcin, 2006. "Monetary Policy, Corporate Financial Composition and Real Activity," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 52(1), pages 177-213, March.
    16. Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2012. "Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 179-205, July.
    17. Kenneth A. Kim & John R. Nofsinger, 2005. "Institutional Herding, Business Groups, and Economic Regimes: Evidence from Japan," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(1), pages 213-242, January.
    18. Saito, Takuji & Odagiri, Hiroyuki, 2008. "Intraboard heterogeneity and the role of bank-dispatched directors in Japanese firms: An empirical study," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 572-590, November.
    19. Fabio Bertoni & María Ferrer & José Martí, 2013. "The different roles played by venture capital and private equity investors on the investment activity of their portfolio firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 607-633, April.
    20. Annalisa Ferrando & Klaas Mulier, 2015. "Firms’ Financing Constraints: Do Perceptions Match the Actual Situation?," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 46(1), pages 87-117.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmdy:fsiv9743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.