IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb649/sfb649dp2005-053.html

Explicit characterization of the super-replication strategy in financial markets with partial transaction costs

Author

Listed:
  • Bentahar, Imen
  • Bouchard, Bruno

Abstract

We consider a continuous time multivariate financial market with proportional transaction costs and study the problem of finding the minimal initial capital needed to hedge, without risk, European-type contingent claims. The model is similar to the one considered in Bouchard and Touzi (2000) except that some of the assets can be exchanged freely, i.e. without paying transaction costs. This is the so-called non-efficient friction case. To our knowledge, this is the first time that such a model is considered in a continuous time setting. In this context, we generalize the result of the above paper and prove that the super-replication price is given by the cost of the cheapest hedging strategy in which the number of non-freely exchangeable assets is kept constant over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Bentahar, Imen & Bouchard, Bruno, 2005. "Explicit characterization of the super-replication strategy in financial markets with partial transaction costs," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2005-053, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb649:sfb649dp2005-053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/25072/1/512451818.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jouini Elyes & Kallal Hedi, 1995. "Martingales and Arbitrage in Securities Markets with Transaction Costs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 178-197, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florig, Michael & Gossner, Olivier, 2024. "Market equilibrium with management costs and implications for insurance accounting," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125396, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Maxim Bichuch & Agostino Capponi & Stephan Sturm, 2016. "Arbitrage-Free XVA," Papers 1608.02690, arXiv.org.
    3. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    4. Czichowsky, Christoph & Schachermayer, Walter & Yang, Junjian, 2017. "Shadow prices for continuous processes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63370, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Ismail Iyigunler & Rodrigo Rodriguez, 2012. "Dynamic Conic Finance: Pricing and Hedging in Market Models with Transaction Costs via Dynamic Coherent Acceptability Indices," Papers 1205.4790, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    6. Villena, Marcelo J. & Reus, Lorenzo, 2016. "On the strategic behavior of large investors: A mean-variance portfolio approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 679-688.
    7. Patrick Beissner, 2019. "Coherent-Price Systems and Uncertainty-Neutral Valuation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Emmanuel Lepinette, 2020. "Random optimization on random sets," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 159-173, February.
    9. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    10. Driessen, Joost & Melenberg, Bertrand & Nijman, Theo, 2005. "Testing affine term structure models in case of transaction costs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 201-232, May.
    11. E. Jouini & P. -F. Koehl & N. Touzi, 1997. "Incomplete markets, transaction costs and liquidity effects," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 325-347.
    12. Patrick Bei{ss}ner, 2012. "Coherent Price Systems and Uncertainty-Neutral Valuation," Papers 1202.6632, arXiv.org.
    13. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2011. "Existence of shadow prices in finite probability spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 73(2), pages 251-262, April.
    14. Carassus, Laurence & Jouini, Elyes, 2000. "A discrete stochastic model for investment with an application to the transaction costs case," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 57-80, February.
    15. Kaval, K. & Molchanov, I., 2006. "Link-save trading," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 710-728, September.
    16. Tahir Choulli & Jun Deng & Junfeng Ma, 2012. "How Non-Arbitrage, Viability and Num\'eraire Portfolio are Related," Papers 1211.4598, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2014.
    17. Siu, Tak Kuen, 2023. "European option pricing with market frictions, regime switches and model uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 233-250.
    18. Balbás, Alejandro & Downarowicz, Anna & Gil-Bazo, Javier, 2005. "Market imperfections, discount factors and stochastic dominance: an empirical analysis with oil-linked derivatives," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb055013, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    19. Nicola Secomandi & Sunder Kekre, 2014. "Optimal Energy Procurement in Spot and Forward Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 270-282, May.
    20. Nietert, Bernhard & Wilhelm, Jochen, 2001. "Some economic remarks on arbitrage theory," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe 7, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb649:sfb649dp2005-053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sohubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.