IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/200715.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Theorie für die Praxis - Zehn Thesen zur wirtschafts- und unternehmensethischen Ausbildung von Führungskräften

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Hielscher, Stefan
  • Beckmann, Markus

Abstract

International stehen Forderungen im Raum, die betriebswirtschaftliche Ausbildung so auszurichten, dass sie der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen einen systematischen Stellenwert beimisst. Der hierfür erforderliche Dialog zwischen BWL und Unternehmensethik kommt jedoch derzeit nicht zustande, weil einigen unternehmensethischen Ansätzen (nach wie vor) die ökonomische Fundierung fehlt, die sie an die betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Lehre anschlussfähig machen könnte. Vor diesem Hintergrund argumentiert dieser Beitrag, ((a)) warum die Unternehmensethik von einer wirtschaftsethischen Konzeption gesteuert sein muss und warum es vorteilhaft ist, wenn eine solche Ethik als ökonomische Theorie der Moral operiert, ((b)) wie eine solche Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik in die Ausbildung von Führungskräften integriert werden kann, so dass die BWL als Theorie für die Praxis nicht verarmt, sondern bereichert wird und ((c)) wie – angesichts einer erneut heftig geführten Theoriedebatte (Albach-Kontroverse) – interdisziplinäres Lernen zwischen Unternehmensethik und BWL theoretisch ansetzen könnte.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2007. "Theorie für die Praxis - Zehn Thesen zur wirtschafts- und unternehmensethischen Ausbildung von Führungskräften," Discussion Papers 2007-15, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:200715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170290/1/dp2007-15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heath, Joseph, 2006. "Business Ethics without Stakeholders," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 533-557, October.
    2. John R. Boatright, 2006. "What's Wrong—and What's Right— with Stakeholder Management," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 22(Spring 20), pages 106-130.
    3. Buttkereit, Sören & Pies, Ingo, 2006. "The economic ethics of social dilemmas," Discussion Papers 2006-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pies, Ingo, 2008. "Markt und Organisation: Programmatische Überlegungen zur Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik," Discussion Papers 2008-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus, 2007. "Wie können Corporate Citizens voneinander lernen? Anregungen für den Global Compact der Vereinten Nationen," Discussion Papers 2007-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2008. "Corporate citizenship as stakeholder management: An ordonomic approach to business ethics," Discussion Papers 2008-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Margaret Oppenheimer & Helen LaVan & William Martin, 2015. "A Framework for Understanding Ethical and Efficiency Issues in Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property Litigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 505-524, December.
    4. Jeffery Smith, 2018. "Efficiency and Ethically Responsible Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 603-618, July.
    5. Etye Steinberg, 2022. "Run for Your Life: The Ethics of Behavioral Tracking in Insurance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 665-682, September.
    6. Francis Weyzig, 2009. "Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the CSR Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 417-428, June.
    7. Lisa Herzog, 2017. "No Company is an Island. Sector-Related Responsibilities as Elements of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 135-148, November.
    8. Abraham Singer, 2018. "Justice Failure: Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 97-115, April.
    9. Mindaugas Laužikas & Mindaugas Laužikas & Aistė Miliūtė & Aistė Miliūtė, 2019. "Transformational Communication via Evolving Ethical and Moral Norms of Lithuanian Civil Service Organizations," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1750-1761, June.
    10. Frooman, Jeff, 2021. "Where MLM Intersects MFA: Morally Suspect Goods and the Grounds for Regulatory Action," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 138-161, January.
    11. Wayne Norman & Caroline Roux & Philippe Bélanger, 2009. "Recognizing Business Ethics: Practical and Ethical Challenges in Awarding Prizes for Good Corporate Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 257-271, May.
    12. Mohamed Laid Ouakouak & Noufou Ouedraogo, 2017. "Antecedents Of Employee Creativity And Organisational Innovation: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Dennis Schoeneborn & Fabian Homberg, 2018. "Goffman’s Return to Las Vegas: Studying Corruption as Social Interaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 37-54, August.
    14. Alexander Brink, 2010. "Enlightened Corporate Governance: Specific Investments by Employees as Legitimation for Residual Claims," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 641-651, June.
    15. Michael Buckley, 2013. "A Constructivist Approach to Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(4), pages 695-706, November.
    16. Joseph Heath, 2011. "Business Ethics and the ‘End of History’ in Corporate Law," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 5-20, March.
    17. Jeffrey Moriarty, 2020. "On the Origin, Content, and Relevance of the Market Failures Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 113-124, August.
    18. Helen J. Mussell, 2023. "Theorising the Fiduciary: Ontology and Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 293-307, August.
    19. Miguel Alzola, 2018. "Decent Work: The Moral Status of Labor in Human Resource Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 835-853, February.
    20. Cairns, George & Goodwin, Paul & Wright, George, 2016. "A decision-analysis-based framework for analysing stakeholder behaviour in scenario planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1050-1062.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unternehmensethik; Wirtschaftsethik; Ordnung der Marktwirtschaft; Globalisierung; Corporate Social Responsibility; Corporate Citizenship; UN Global Compact; soziale Dilemmata; orthogonale Positionierung; gesellschaftliche Verantwortung; operatives Management; strategisches Management; Ausbildung von Führungskräften; business ethics; economic ethics; order of the market economy; globalization; corporate social responsibility; corporate citizenship; UN global compact; social dilemma structures; orthogonal position; management; strategic management; management education;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:200715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.