IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse23/277971.html

AI-generated lemons: a sour outlook for content producers?

Author

Listed:
  • Howell, Bronwyn E.
  • Potgieter, Petrus H.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for natural language processing have made dramatic advances in the past few years (Lin 2023). Thunström & Steingrimsson (2022) demonstrated that the present generation of AI text engines are even able to write low-level scientific pieces about themselves, with relatively minimal prompting, whereas Goyal et al. (2022) show how good general-purpose AI language engines are at summarizing news articles. There is however a downside to all of this progress. Bontridder & Poullet (2021) point out how inexpensive it has become to generate deepfake videos and synthetic voice recordings. Kreps et al. (2022) look at AI generated text and find that "individuals are largely incapable of distinguishing between AI- and human-generated text". Illia et al. (2023) point to three ethical challenges raised by automated text generation that is difficult to distinguish from human writing: 1. facilitation of mass manipulation and disinformation; 2. a lowest denominator problem where a mass of low-quality but incredibly cheap text, crowds out higher-quality discourse; and 3. the suppression of direct communication between stakeholders and an attendant drop in the levels of trust. Our focus is mainly on (2) and we examine the institutional consequences that may arise in two specific sectors currently already facing challenges from AI-generated text: scientific journals and social media platforms. Drawing on the body of learning from institutional economics regarding responses to uncertainties in the veracity of information, it also proposes some elementary remedies that may prove helpful in navigating through the anticipated challenges. Distinguishing genuinely human-authored content from machine-generated text will likely be more easily done using a credible signal of the authenticity of the content creator. This is a variation of Akerlof's (1970) famous "market for lemons" problem. This paper uses an inductive approach to examine sections of the content industry that are likely to be particularly relevant to "market for lemons" substitution, referring to the framework of Giannakas & Fulton (2020).

Suggested Citation

  • Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2023. "AI-generated lemons: a sour outlook for content producers?," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277971, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse23:277971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/277971/1/Howell-Potgieter.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Park & Erin Leahey & Russell J. Funk, 2023. "Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7942), pages 138-144, January.
    2. Jennifer Byrne, 2019. "We need to talk about systematic fraud," Nature, Nature, vol. 566(7742), pages 9-9, February.
    3. Holly Else, 2023. "Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7944), pages 423-423, January.
    4. repec:pri:cpanda:wp17%20-%20dimaggio,%20hargittai,%20neuman,%20robinson is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Benoît Dupont & Anne-Marie Côté & Claire Savine & David Décary-Hétu, 2016. "The ecology of trust among hackers," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 129-151, April.
    6. Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2023. "What do telecommunications policy academics have to fear from GPT-3?," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277972, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Guillaume Cabanac & Cyril Labbé, 2021. "Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(12), pages 1461-1476, December.
    8. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai & W. Russell Neuman & John P. Robinson, 2001. "Social Implications of the Internet," Working Papers 159, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    9. Adam Day, 2022. "Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5965-5987, October.
    10. Alessandro Checco & Lorenzo Bracciale & Pierpaolo Loreti & Stephen Pinfield & Giuseppe Bianchi, 2021. "AI-assisted peer review," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Chengcheng Shao & Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia & Onur Varol & Kai-Cheng Yang & Alessandro Flammini & Filippo Menczer, 2018. "The spread of low-credibility content by social bots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Engers, Maxim & Gans, Joshua S, 1998. "Why Referees Are Not Paid (Enough)," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1341-1349, December.
    13. Vanja Pupovac, 2021. "The frequency of plagiarism identified by text-matching software in scientific articles: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 8981-9003, November.
    14. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai & W. Russell Neuman & John P. Robinson, 2001. "Social Implications of the Internet," Working Papers 159, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanina Welp & Ferran Urgell & Eduard Aibar, 2007. "From Bureaucratic Administration to Network Administration? An Empirical Study on E-Government Focus on Catalonia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 299-316, December.
    2. Stan Geertman & John Stillwell, 2020. "Planning support science: Developments and challenges," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1326-1342, October.
    3. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Davidson Okai & Alberto Posso, 2016. "Internet Use and Ethnic Heterogeneity in a Cross-Section of Countries," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(1), pages 59-72, March.
    4. Angelo Antoci & Alexia Delfino & Fabio Paglieri & Fabrizio Panebianco & Fabio Sabatini, 2016. "Civility vs. Incivility in Online Social Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Carlota Batres & David I Perrett, 2014. "The Influence of the Digital Divide on Face Preferences in El Salvador: People without Internet Access Prefer More Feminine Men, More Masculine Women, and Women with Higher Adiposity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-6, July.
    6. Özbay, Özden, 2008. "Does social capital deter youth from cheating, alcohol use, and violence in Turkey?: Bringing torpil in," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 403-415, September.
    7. Dohse, Dirk & Lim, Cheng Yee, 2016. "Macro-geographic location and internet adoption in poor countries: What is behind the persistent digital gap?," Kiel Working Papers 2067, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    8. Judit Bar-Ilan, 2018. "Eugene Garfield on the Web in 2001," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 389-399, February.
    9. Dejean, Sylvain & Jullien, Nicolas, 2015. "Big from the beginning: Assessing online contributors’ behavior by their first contribution," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 1226-1239.
    10. Ryan-Claytor, Cayley, 2025. "Web and/or MD?: Empirically testing the relationships between internet use and visits to healthcare professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 376(C).
    11. Judy Wajcman & Emily Rose & Judith E. Brown & Michael Bittman, 2010. "Enacting virtual connections between work and home," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29439, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Uwe Matzat, 2004. "The Social Embeddedness of Academic Online Groups in Offline Networks as a Norm Generating Structure: An Empirical Test of the Coleman Model on Norm Emergence," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 205-226, November.
    13. Nevado-Peña, Domingo & López-Ruiz, Víctor-Raúl & Alfaro-Navarro, José-Luis, 2019. "Improving quality of life perception with ICT use and technological capacity in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Ali, Maged & Gomes, Lucas Moreira & Azab, Nahed & de Moraes Souza, João Gabriel & Sorour, M. Karim & Kimura, Herbert, 2023. "Panic buying and fake news in urban vs. rural England: A case study of twitter during COVID-19," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Angelo Antoci & Fabio Sabatini, 2018. "Online networks, social interaction and segregation: an evolutionary approach," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 859-883, September.
    16. Nan Jiang, 2019. "Adult Children’s Education and Later-Life Health of Parents in China: The Intergenerational Effects of Human Capital Investment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 257-278, August.
    17. Russell Craig & Joel Amernic, 2002. "Accountability of accounting educators and the rhythm of the university: resistance strategies for postmodern blues," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 121-171.
    18. Tongjoo Suh, 2025. "Analysis of the income effect by the digital divide: focus on Korean farmers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(1), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Regina Sally Maison & Kennedy Boe-Doe & Mabel Anane & Sylvester Tenkorang, 2024. "Perceived Impact of Internet Usage on Academic Performance of Students in Foso College of Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 705-716, July.
    20. Kanungo, Rama Prasad & Gupta, Suraksha & Patel, Parth & Prikshat, Verma & Liu, Rui, 2022. "Digital consumption and socio-normative vulnerability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse23:277971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.