IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse17/169473.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Game of chance elements in free-to-play mobile games. A freemium business model monetization tool in need of self-regulation?

Author

Listed:
  • Koeder, Marco Josef
  • Tanaka, Ema

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes “Gacha”, a lottery mechanism to win virtual items, which was developed in Japan, as game of chance elements in mobile games which is used for monetization in freemium business models. Based on the concept of Gacha, referring to previous studies, this paper also analyzes the difference of mobile game regulation between the West and Japan. Japan has a longer history and more experience in both monetization of mobile games with gambling like elements (Gacha) and its regulation including self-regulation. Specific kinds of Gacha are regulated in Japan, not because of its quasi-gamble mechanism, which is in contrast to previous study perception, but because of its misleading marketing promotion method. The Japanese regulatory approach to handle the game of chance issues is to increase the transparency of probability of winning which gives consumer better chances to consider their total amount of spending on Gacha.

Suggested Citation

  • Koeder, Marco Josef & Tanaka, Ema, 2017. "Game of chance elements in free-to-play mobile games. A freemium business model monetization tool in need of self-regulation?," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169473, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/169473/1/Koeder-Tanaka.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lehdonvirta, Vili & Castronova, Edward, 2014. "Virtual Economies: Design and Analysis," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262027259, December.
    2. Feijoo, Claudio & Gómez-Barroso, José-Luis & Aguado, Juan-Miguel & Ramos, Sergio, 2012. "Mobile gaming: Industry challenges and policy implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 212-221.
    3. Sally M. Gainsbury & Nerilee Hing & Paul H. Delfabbro & Daniel L. King, 2014. "A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 196-213, August.
    4. Oecd, 2013. "The App Economy," OECD Digital Economy Papers 230, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. Tuomas Harviainen & Jukka Ojasalo & Somasundaram Nanda Kumar, 2018. "Customer preferences in mobile game pricing: a service design based case study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 191-203, May.
    2. von Meduna, Marc & Steinmetz, Fred & Ante, Lennart & Reynolds, Jennifer & Fiedler, Ingo, 2020. "Loot boxes are gambling-like elements in video games with harmful potential: Results from a large-scale population survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuditta DE PRATO & Claudio FEIJÓO & Jean-Paul SIMON, 2014. "Innovations in the Video Game Industry: Changing Global Markets," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(94), pages 17-38, 2nd quart.
    2. J. Tuomas Harviainen & Jukka Ojasalo & Somasundaram Nanda Kumar, 2018. "Customer preferences in mobile game pricing: a service design based case study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 191-203, May.
    3. Sugata Marjit & Biswajit Mandal, 2017. "Virtual trade between separated time zones and growth," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(2), pages 171-183, June.
    4. Šimurková Patrícia & Poliak Miloš & Hernandez Salvador, 2018. "Uniform Market Conditions in Road Freight Transport," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 94-104, May.
    5. Arenal, Alberto & Armuña, Cristina & Feijoo, Claudio & Ramos, Sergio & Xu, Zimu & Moreno, Ana, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    6. Colciago, Andrea & Etro, Federico, 2013. "Cloud computing, structural change and job creation in SMEs," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 37064.
    7. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 268-283.
    8. Olli I. Heimo & J. Tuomas Harviainen & Kai K. Kimppa & Tuomas Mäkilä, 2018. "Virtual to Virtuous Money: A Virtue Ethics Perspective on Video Game Business Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 95-103, November.
    9. Goumagias, Nikolaos & Fernandes, Kiran Jude & Nucciarelli, Alberto & Li, Feng, 2022. "How to overcome path dependency through resource reconfiguration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 78-91.
    10. Koeder, Marco Josef & Tanaka, Ema & Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2018. ""Lootboxes" in digital games - A gamble with consumers in need of regulation? An evaluation based on learnings from Japan," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190385, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Bustillo, René, 2013. "Net neutrality: debate and policies," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 37067.
    12. Odunayo Magret Olarewaju & Joseph Olorunfemi Akande, 2016. "An Empirical Analysis of Capital Adequacy Determinants in Nigerian Banking Sector," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(12), pages 132-142, December.
    13. Nerilee Hing & Cassandra K. Dittman & Alex M. T. Russell & Daniel L. King & Matthew Rockloff & Matthew Browne & Philip Newall & Nancy Greer, 2022. "Adolescents Who Play and Spend Money in Simulated Gambling Games Are at Heightened Risk of Gambling Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Barrantes, Roxana & Jordán, Valeria & Rojas, Fernando, 2013. "The shifting digital paradigm in Latin America," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 37059.
    15. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2017. "Unraveling Platform Strategies: A Review from an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    16. James Stewart & Lizzy Bleumers & Centeno, 2013. "The Potential of Digital Games for Empowerment and Social Inclusion of Groups at Risk of Social and Economic Exclusion: Evidence and Opportunity for Policy," JRC Research Reports JRC78777, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Hamari, Juho & Hanner, Nicolai & Koivisto, Jonna, 2017. "Service quality explains why people use freemium services but not if they go premium: An empirical study in free-to-play games," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1449-1459.
    18. Flepp, Raphael & Nüesch, Stephan & Franck, Egon, 2017. "The liquidity advantage of the quote-driven market: Evidence from the betting industry," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 306-317.
    19. Gareth W Peters & Ariane Chapelle & Efstathios Panayi, 2016. "Opening discussion on banking sector risk exposures and vulnerabilities from Virtual currencies: An Operational Risk perspective," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 239-272, November.
    20. John C. Boik, 2014. "First Microsimulation Model of a LEDDA Community Currency-Dollar Economy," Working Paper 0001, Principled Societies Project, revised Oct 2014.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Free-to-play; freemium; mobile games; behavior; regulation; Gambling; virtual goods; Japan; Europe;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.